{"title":"比较高仿真模拟器和可穿戴模拟器对跨专业团队的团队沟通、临床判断和患者安全的影响","authors":"Rebecca Lyon MS, PA-C , Jennifer McAdams MSN, RNC-OB, C-EFM , Alaina Tellson PhD, RN, NPD-BC, NEA-BC , Marlene T. Porter PhD, RN, NPD-BC, CCRN, CEN","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Escalating maternal morbidity and mortality rates in the United States demand effective healthcare provider training. This study examined an interprofessional team's communication, clinical judgment, and patient safety using a high-fidelity simulator versus a wearable simulator by a standard patient.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study employed a two-group comparative, quasi-experimental design. The intervention group used a wearable simulator, while the control group used a high-fidelity mannequin.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The final sample consisted of 85 individuals (49 intervention, 33 control group). No significant differences in simulation effectiveness were observed between groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Equivalent performance outcomes suggest institutions can choose simulation modalities based on cost, availability, and logistical considerations without compromising training quality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing high fidelity simulator versus wearable simulator on team communication, clinical judgment, and patient safety in an interprofessional team\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Lyon MS, PA-C , Jennifer McAdams MSN, RNC-OB, C-EFM , Alaina Tellson PhD, RN, NPD-BC, NEA-BC , Marlene T. Porter PhD, RN, NPD-BC, CCRN, CEN\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Escalating maternal morbidity and mortality rates in the United States demand effective healthcare provider training. This study examined an interprofessional team's communication, clinical judgment, and patient safety using a high-fidelity simulator versus a wearable simulator by a standard patient.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study employed a two-group comparative, quasi-experimental design. The intervention group used a wearable simulator, while the control group used a high-fidelity mannequin.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The final sample consisted of 85 individuals (49 intervention, 33 control group). No significant differences in simulation effectiveness were observed between groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Equivalent performance outcomes suggest institutions can choose simulation modalities based on cost, availability, and logistical considerations without compromising training quality.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Simulation in Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Simulation in Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924000562\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924000562","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparing high fidelity simulator versus wearable simulator on team communication, clinical judgment, and patient safety in an interprofessional team
Background
Escalating maternal morbidity and mortality rates in the United States demand effective healthcare provider training. This study examined an interprofessional team's communication, clinical judgment, and patient safety using a high-fidelity simulator versus a wearable simulator by a standard patient.
Methods
The study employed a two-group comparative, quasi-experimental design. The intervention group used a wearable simulator, while the control group used a high-fidelity mannequin.
Results
The final sample consisted of 85 individuals (49 intervention, 33 control group). No significant differences in simulation effectiveness were observed between groups.
Conclusion
Equivalent performance outcomes suggest institutions can choose simulation modalities based on cost, availability, and logistical considerations without compromising training quality.
期刊介绍：
Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation.
We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria:
Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation
Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation
Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation
Leadership for simulation
Simulation operations
Clinical and academic uses of simulation.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
