蚕蛹和油辣木叶作为替代蛋白质来源的价值:结构、功能和抗氧化特性

IF 7.2 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Susma Bhattarai , Wattinee Katekhong , Utai Klinkesorn , Methavee Peanparkdee
{"title":"蚕蛹和油辣木叶作为替代蛋白质来源的价值:结构、功能和抗氧化特性","authors":"Susma Bhattarai ,&nbsp;Wattinee Katekhong ,&nbsp;Utai Klinkesorn ,&nbsp;Methavee Peanparkdee","doi":"10.1016/j.fufo.2024.100408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study compared protein concentrates extracted from silkworm pupae (SPP) and moringa leaf (MLP) using alkaline extraction followed by isoelectric precipitation with commercial whey protein concentrate (WPC). SPP demonstrated higher protein extraction yield of 5.99 % and protein recovery of 66.02 % compared to MLP (4.39% and 55.27% of extraction yield and protein recovery, respectively). Proximate composition analysis revealed that SPP contained high protein of 65.40 % with ∼13 % fat content, while MLP had lower protein (48.70%) and fat content (0.33%). Particle size analysis showed small mean diameters of ∼123 nm for WPC, ∼192 nm for SPP, and ∼1485 nm for MLP with low polydispersity index (0.35 to 0.51). Secondary structure analysis highlighted β-sheet as predominant in WPC and MLP, while SPP exhibited a major β-turns structure. Solubility studies indicated that SPP had lowest solubility compared to others. In terms of functional properties, MLP exhibited the highest water and oil holding capacities, and foaming capacity, while SPP showed the greatest emulsifying capacity and stability. After passing simulated intestinal digestion, SPP exhibited the highest recovery of TPC, ABTS, DPPH, and FRAP. This study emphasizes the feasibility and advantages of utilizing SPP and MLP as food ingredients for various food applications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34474,"journal":{"name":"Future Foods","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100408"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266683352400114X/pdfft?md5=5af9c1f89d0bf7fd7ab454ee2baddb61&pid=1-s2.0-S266683352400114X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Valorization of Bombyx mori pupae and Moringa oleifera leaf as sources of alternative protein: Structural, functional and antioxidant properties\",\"authors\":\"Susma Bhattarai ,&nbsp;Wattinee Katekhong ,&nbsp;Utai Klinkesorn ,&nbsp;Methavee Peanparkdee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fufo.2024.100408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study compared protein concentrates extracted from silkworm pupae (SPP) and moringa leaf (MLP) using alkaline extraction followed by isoelectric precipitation with commercial whey protein concentrate (WPC). SPP demonstrated higher protein extraction yield of 5.99 % and protein recovery of 66.02 % compared to MLP (4.39% and 55.27% of extraction yield and protein recovery, respectively). Proximate composition analysis revealed that SPP contained high protein of 65.40 % with ∼13 % fat content, while MLP had lower protein (48.70%) and fat content (0.33%). Particle size analysis showed small mean diameters of ∼123 nm for WPC, ∼192 nm for SPP, and ∼1485 nm for MLP with low polydispersity index (0.35 to 0.51). Secondary structure analysis highlighted β-sheet as predominant in WPC and MLP, while SPP exhibited a major β-turns structure. Solubility studies indicated that SPP had lowest solubility compared to others. In terms of functional properties, MLP exhibited the highest water and oil holding capacities, and foaming capacity, while SPP showed the greatest emulsifying capacity and stability. After passing simulated intestinal digestion, SPP exhibited the highest recovery of TPC, ABTS, DPPH, and FRAP. This study emphasizes the feasibility and advantages of utilizing SPP and MLP as food ingredients for various food applications.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future Foods\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100408\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266683352400114X/pdfft?md5=5af9c1f89d0bf7fd7ab454ee2baddb61&pid=1-s2.0-S266683352400114X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future Foods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266683352400114X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Foods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266683352400114X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究将从蚕蛹(SPP)和辣木叶(MLP)中提取的浓缩蛋白与商业浓缩乳清蛋白(WPC)进行了比较,前者采用碱性提取,后者采用等电沉淀法。与 MLP(提取率和蛋白质回收率分别为 4.39% 和 55.27%)相比,SPP 的蛋白质提取率为 5.99%,蛋白质回收率为 66.02%。近似成分分析表明,SPP 含有 65.40 % 的高蛋白和 13 % 的脂肪,而 MLP 蛋白质含量(48.70 %)和脂肪含量(0.33 %)较低。粒度分析表明,WPC 的平均直径较小,为 123 nm,SPP 为 192 nm,MLP 为 1485 nm,多分散指数较低(0.35 至 0.51)。二级结构分析显示,WPC 和 MLP 主要为 β-片状结构,而 SPP 则主要为 β-匝结构。溶解度研究表明,与其他物质相比,SPP 的溶解度最低。在功能特性方面,MLP 的保水、保油和发泡能力最强,而 SPP 的乳化能力和稳定性最强。在通过模拟肠道消化后,SPP 的 TPC、ABTS、DPPH 和 FRAP 回收率最高。这项研究强调了将 SPP 和 MLP 用作各种食品配料的可行性和优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Valorization of Bombyx mori pupae and Moringa oleifera leaf as sources of alternative protein: Structural, functional and antioxidant properties

Valorization of Bombyx mori pupae and Moringa oleifera leaf as sources of alternative protein: Structural, functional and antioxidant properties

This study compared protein concentrates extracted from silkworm pupae (SPP) and moringa leaf (MLP) using alkaline extraction followed by isoelectric precipitation with commercial whey protein concentrate (WPC). SPP demonstrated higher protein extraction yield of 5.99 % and protein recovery of 66.02 % compared to MLP (4.39% and 55.27% of extraction yield and protein recovery, respectively). Proximate composition analysis revealed that SPP contained high protein of 65.40 % with ∼13 % fat content, while MLP had lower protein (48.70%) and fat content (0.33%). Particle size analysis showed small mean diameters of ∼123 nm for WPC, ∼192 nm for SPP, and ∼1485 nm for MLP with low polydispersity index (0.35 to 0.51). Secondary structure analysis highlighted β-sheet as predominant in WPC and MLP, while SPP exhibited a major β-turns structure. Solubility studies indicated that SPP had lowest solubility compared to others. In terms of functional properties, MLP exhibited the highest water and oil holding capacities, and foaming capacity, while SPP showed the greatest emulsifying capacity and stability. After passing simulated intestinal digestion, SPP exhibited the highest recovery of TPC, ABTS, DPPH, and FRAP. This study emphasizes the feasibility and advantages of utilizing SPP and MLP as food ingredients for various food applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Future Foods
Future Foods Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Future Foods is a specialized journal that is dedicated to tackling the challenges posed by climate change and the need for sustainability in the realm of food production. The journal recognizes the imperative to transform current food manufacturing and consumption practices to meet the dietary needs of a burgeoning global population while simultaneously curbing environmental degradation. The mission of Future Foods is to disseminate research that aligns with the goal of fostering the development of innovative technologies and alternative food sources to establish more sustainable food systems. The journal is committed to publishing high-quality, peer-reviewed articles that contribute to the advancement of sustainable food practices. Abstracting and indexing: Scopus Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) SNIP
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信