不同氮肥施用量和气候条件下薄膜覆盖玉米的蒸散量、水分利用效率和产量

IF 5.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Heng Fang , Yuannong Li , Xiaobo Gu , Yadan Du , Pengpeng Chen , Hongxiang Hu
{"title":"不同氮肥施用量和气候条件下薄膜覆盖玉米的蒸散量、水分利用效率和产量","authors":"Heng Fang ,&nbsp;Yuannong Li ,&nbsp;Xiaobo Gu ,&nbsp;Yadan Du ,&nbsp;Pengpeng Chen ,&nbsp;Hongxiang Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The biodegradable film, as an ideal substitute for plastic film, has broad application prospects. However, it is uncertain in maize actual evapotranspiration (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>ET</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>ac</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>) components, yield, and water use efficiency (WUE) of biodegradable and plastic films during the different rainfall seasons. Therefore, a 4-year field trial with three mulching patterns (FNM: flat planting with non-mulching, RPM: ridge-furrow with plastic film mulching, and RBM: ridge-furrow with biodegradable film mulching) and two N-fertilization levels (0 and 180 kg N ha<sup>–1</sup>) was conducted. The results showed that the machine-learning models could accurately estimate maize <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>ET</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>ac</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> and its partitioning, and the random forest and artificial neural networks models had the highest accuracy and the least input variables after optimization. Compared to FNM, RBM and RPM increased <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>E</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> by 10.8 mm, 14.0 mm in the dry season, 9.1 mm, 11.2 mm in the normal season, and 4.0 mm, 7.5 mm in the wet season, respectively, but decreased <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>E</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>s</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> by 75.8 mm, 82.7 mm in the dry season, 48.6 mm, 56.7 mm in the normal season, 67.1 mm, and 74.9 mm in the wet season, respectively. Therefore, RBM and RPM decreased <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>ET</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>ac</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> by 65.0 mm, 68.8 mm in the dry season, 39.5 mm, 45.6 mm in the normal season, and 53.1 mm, 67.5 mm in the wet season, respectively, compared to FNM. Nitrogen application had a similar effect on <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>E</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>s</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> and <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>E</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> but only increased <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>ET</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>ac</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> by 13.3 mm in the dry season, 2 mm in the normal season, and 4.3 mm in the wet season, respectively, compared to N0. Furthermore, RBM and RPM under different nitrogen-fertilizations increased maize yield by 4.0 %, 3.6 % in the dry season, 3.0 %, 3.3 % in the normal season, and 5.3 %, 5.9 % in the wet season, respectively, also increased maize WUE by 23.3 %, 24.1 % in the dry season, 12.9 %, 15.0 % in the normal season, and 21.1 %, 23.4 % in the wet season, respectively, compared to FNM. This study proved that RPM could be replaced by RBM under 180 kg N ha<sup>–1</sup> in the different rainfall seasons in terms of reducing <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>ET</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>ac</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>, increasing maize yield, and improving WUE. The optimized machine learning models in this study also provided a low-cost method for computing regional maize <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>ET</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>ac</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7634,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Water Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424002701/pdfft?md5=57076a51047a4e127b4be6100db3a219&pid=1-s2.0-S0378377424002701-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evapotranspiration, water use efficiency, and yield for film mulched maize under different nitrogen-fertilization rates and climate conditions\",\"authors\":\"Heng Fang ,&nbsp;Yuannong Li ,&nbsp;Xiaobo Gu ,&nbsp;Yadan Du ,&nbsp;Pengpeng Chen ,&nbsp;Hongxiang Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108935\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The biodegradable film, as an ideal substitute for plastic film, has broad application prospects. However, it is uncertain in maize actual evapotranspiration (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>ET</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>ac</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>) components, yield, and water use efficiency (WUE) of biodegradable and plastic films during the different rainfall seasons. Therefore, a 4-year field trial with three mulching patterns (FNM: flat planting with non-mulching, RPM: ridge-furrow with plastic film mulching, and RBM: ridge-furrow with biodegradable film mulching) and two N-fertilization levels (0 and 180 kg N ha<sup>–1</sup>) was conducted. The results showed that the machine-learning models could accurately estimate maize <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>ET</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>ac</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> and its partitioning, and the random forest and artificial neural networks models had the highest accuracy and the least input variables after optimization. Compared to FNM, RBM and RPM increased <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>E</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> by 10.8 mm, 14.0 mm in the dry season, 9.1 mm, 11.2 mm in the normal season, and 4.0 mm, 7.5 mm in the wet season, respectively, but decreased <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>E</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>s</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> by 75.8 mm, 82.7 mm in the dry season, 48.6 mm, 56.7 mm in the normal season, 67.1 mm, and 74.9 mm in the wet season, respectively. Therefore, RBM and RPM decreased <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>ET</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>ac</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> by 65.0 mm, 68.8 mm in the dry season, 39.5 mm, 45.6 mm in the normal season, and 53.1 mm, 67.5 mm in the wet season, respectively, compared to FNM. Nitrogen application had a similar effect on <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>E</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>s</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> and <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>E</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> but only increased <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>ET</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>ac</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> by 13.3 mm in the dry season, 2 mm in the normal season, and 4.3 mm in the wet season, respectively, compared to N0. Furthermore, RBM and RPM under different nitrogen-fertilizations increased maize yield by 4.0 %, 3.6 % in the dry season, 3.0 %, 3.3 % in the normal season, and 5.3 %, 5.9 % in the wet season, respectively, also increased maize WUE by 23.3 %, 24.1 % in the dry season, 12.9 %, 15.0 % in the normal season, and 21.1 %, 23.4 % in the wet season, respectively, compared to FNM. This study proved that RPM could be replaced by RBM under 180 kg N ha<sup>–1</sup> in the different rainfall seasons in terms of reducing <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>ET</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>ac</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>, increasing maize yield, and improving WUE. The optimized machine learning models in this study also provided a low-cost method for computing regional maize <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>ET</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>ac</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Water Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424002701/pdfft?md5=57076a51047a4e127b4be6100db3a219&pid=1-s2.0-S0378377424002701-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Water Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424002701\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Water Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424002701","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物降解薄膜作为塑料薄膜的理想替代品,具有广阔的应用前景。然而,生物降解膜和塑料薄膜在不同降雨季节的玉米实际蒸散量(ETac)成分、产量和水分利用效率(WUE)还不确定。因此,进行了一项为期 4 年的田间试验,采用了三种地膜覆盖模式(FNM:无覆膜平播;RPM:塑料薄膜覆膜脊耕;RBM:生物降解膜覆膜脊耕)和两种氮肥水平(0 和 180 千克氮/公顷)。结果表明,机器学习模型可以准确估算玉米 ETac 及其分区,其中随机森林和人工神经网络模型的准确度最高,优化后的输入变量最少。与 FNM 相比,RBM 和 RPM 在旱季分别增加了 10.8 毫米和 14.0 毫米的 Et,在常季分别增加了 9.1 毫米和 11.2 毫米,在雨季分别增加了 4.0 毫米和 7.5 毫米,但在旱季分别减少了 75.8 毫米和 82.7 毫米的 Es,在常季分别减少了 48.6 毫米和 56.7 毫米,在雨季分别减少了 67.1 毫米和 74.9 毫米。因此,与 FNM 相比,RBM 和 RPM 在旱季的 ETac 分别减少了 65.0 毫米和 68.8 毫米,在正常季节分别减少了 39.5 毫米和 45.6 毫米,在雨季分别减少了 53.1 毫米和 67.5 毫米。施氮对Es和Et的影响相似,但与N0相比,ETac在旱季只分别增加了13.3毫米,正常季节增加了2毫米,雨季增加了4.3毫米。此外,在不同氮肥施用条件下,RBM 和 RPM 与 FNM 相比,旱季玉米产量分别提高了 4.0 %、3.6 %,常季分别提高了 3.0 %、3.3 %,雨季分别提高了 5.3 %、5.9 %,玉米 WUE 分别提高了 23.3 %、24.1 %,常季分别提高了 12.9 %、15.0 %,雨季分别提高了 21.1 %、23.4 %。这项研究证明,在不同降雨季节,在每公顷 180 千克氮的条件下,RBM 可以替代 RPM,从而降低 ETac,提高玉米产量,改善 WUE。本研究中的优化机器学习模型还提供了一种计算区域玉米 ETac 的低成本方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evapotranspiration, water use efficiency, and yield for film mulched maize under different nitrogen-fertilization rates and climate conditions

The biodegradable film, as an ideal substitute for plastic film, has broad application prospects. However, it is uncertain in maize actual evapotranspiration (ETac) components, yield, and water use efficiency (WUE) of biodegradable and plastic films during the different rainfall seasons. Therefore, a 4-year field trial with three mulching patterns (FNM: flat planting with non-mulching, RPM: ridge-furrow with plastic film mulching, and RBM: ridge-furrow with biodegradable film mulching) and two N-fertilization levels (0 and 180 kg N ha–1) was conducted. The results showed that the machine-learning models could accurately estimate maize ETac and its partitioning, and the random forest and artificial neural networks models had the highest accuracy and the least input variables after optimization. Compared to FNM, RBM and RPM increased Et by 10.8 mm, 14.0 mm in the dry season, 9.1 mm, 11.2 mm in the normal season, and 4.0 mm, 7.5 mm in the wet season, respectively, but decreased Es by 75.8 mm, 82.7 mm in the dry season, 48.6 mm, 56.7 mm in the normal season, 67.1 mm, and 74.9 mm in the wet season, respectively. Therefore, RBM and RPM decreased ETac by 65.0 mm, 68.8 mm in the dry season, 39.5 mm, 45.6 mm in the normal season, and 53.1 mm, 67.5 mm in the wet season, respectively, compared to FNM. Nitrogen application had a similar effect on Es and Et but only increased ETac by 13.3 mm in the dry season, 2 mm in the normal season, and 4.3 mm in the wet season, respectively, compared to N0. Furthermore, RBM and RPM under different nitrogen-fertilizations increased maize yield by 4.0 %, 3.6 % in the dry season, 3.0 %, 3.3 % in the normal season, and 5.3 %, 5.9 % in the wet season, respectively, also increased maize WUE by 23.3 %, 24.1 % in the dry season, 12.9 %, 15.0 % in the normal season, and 21.1 %, 23.4 % in the wet season, respectively, compared to FNM. This study proved that RPM could be replaced by RBM under 180 kg N ha–1 in the different rainfall seasons in terms of reducing ETac, increasing maize yield, and improving WUE. The optimized machine learning models in this study also provided a low-cost method for computing regional maize ETac.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Water Management
Agricultural Water Management 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
14.90%
发文量
648
审稿时长
4.9 months
期刊介绍: Agricultural Water Management publishes papers of international significance relating to the science, economics, and policy of agricultural water management. In all cases, manuscripts must address implications and provide insight regarding agricultural water management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信