在土耳其半干旱地中海生态系统中,通过流域尺度的土壤管理评估框架(SMAF)评估动态土壤质量

IF 3.1 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE
Ahmet Reis , Turgay Dindaroğlu
{"title":"在土耳其半干旱地中海生态系统中,通过流域尺度的土壤管理评估框架(SMAF)评估动态土壤质量","authors":"Ahmet Reis ,&nbsp;Turgay Dindaroğlu","doi":"10.1016/j.geodrs.2024.e00829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Soil is an indispensable and important natural resource and it is necessary to manage and monitor soil quality with appropriate methods in order to ensure the sustainability of the soil. The aim of this study is to determine the current state of soil quality in different land uses where soil functions change. This study was carried out in the Karasu river watershed with an area of 19,178 ha where Entisols soil order is dominant, located Andırın, Kahramanmaraş. The Soil Management Assessment Framework (SMAF) method and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used to assess the dynamic soil quality in watershed scale. In the evaluation of soil quality, random samples were taken from a total of 360 topsoil layers (0−30) according to land use and physiography. Soil indicators such as bulk density, aggregate stability, total organic carbon, pH, electrical conductivity, available phosphorus (P), potassium (K), available water amount and water-filled pore volume were selected to create the minimum data set (MDS). The results showed that the productivity, environmental protection, waste recycling quality scores and general soil quality index of forest lands are higher than agricultural lands. According to expert opinion, general soil quality scores were found to be 0.86 in forest land, 0.78 in crop land and 0.83 in grassland, while in PCA, general soil quality scores were calculated as 0.85 in forest land, 0.79 in crop land and 0.78 in grassland. Contribution level of soil functions to management targets was observed in water relations function the most. The contribution levels of the water relations function to the productivity, environmental protection and waste recycling management targets are 0.38, 0.32 and 0.34 in forest lands, 0.42, 0.33 and 0.35 in croplands, respectively; It was showed that 0.40, 0.33 and 0.36 in grasslands. Contribution rates of productivity, environmental protection and waste recycling management targets to soil quality were 30%, 37% and 33%, respectively, in forest lands; 29%, 37% and 34% in crop lands; It has been determined as 30%, 36% and 34% in the grasslands. Negative effects such as heavy rainfall in the watershed, wrong agricultural practices (excessive fertilization and irrigation, improper tillage, and crop selection, etc.) and excessive grazing have led to soil degradation and erosion, reducing the soil function capacity of agricultural lands and meadows. In order to increase the functional capacity of the soil, a soil management approach aimed at protection, improvement and sustainability must be adopted and implemented.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56001,"journal":{"name":"Geoderma Regional","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article e00829"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating dynamic soil quality by the soil management assessment framework (SMAF) in the watershed scale in a semi-arid Mediterranean ecosystem in Turkey\",\"authors\":\"Ahmet Reis ,&nbsp;Turgay Dindaroğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geodrs.2024.e00829\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Soil is an indispensable and important natural resource and it is necessary to manage and monitor soil quality with appropriate methods in order to ensure the sustainability of the soil. The aim of this study is to determine the current state of soil quality in different land uses where soil functions change. This study was carried out in the Karasu river watershed with an area of 19,178 ha where Entisols soil order is dominant, located Andırın, Kahramanmaraş. The Soil Management Assessment Framework (SMAF) method and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used to assess the dynamic soil quality in watershed scale. In the evaluation of soil quality, random samples were taken from a total of 360 topsoil layers (0−30) according to land use and physiography. Soil indicators such as bulk density, aggregate stability, total organic carbon, pH, electrical conductivity, available phosphorus (P), potassium (K), available water amount and water-filled pore volume were selected to create the minimum data set (MDS). The results showed that the productivity, environmental protection, waste recycling quality scores and general soil quality index of forest lands are higher than agricultural lands. According to expert opinion, general soil quality scores were found to be 0.86 in forest land, 0.78 in crop land and 0.83 in grassland, while in PCA, general soil quality scores were calculated as 0.85 in forest land, 0.79 in crop land and 0.78 in grassland. Contribution level of soil functions to management targets was observed in water relations function the most. The contribution levels of the water relations function to the productivity, environmental protection and waste recycling management targets are 0.38, 0.32 and 0.34 in forest lands, 0.42, 0.33 and 0.35 in croplands, respectively; It was showed that 0.40, 0.33 and 0.36 in grasslands. Contribution rates of productivity, environmental protection and waste recycling management targets to soil quality were 30%, 37% and 33%, respectively, in forest lands; 29%, 37% and 34% in crop lands; It has been determined as 30%, 36% and 34% in the grasslands. Negative effects such as heavy rainfall in the watershed, wrong agricultural practices (excessive fertilization and irrigation, improper tillage, and crop selection, etc.) and excessive grazing have led to soil degradation and erosion, reducing the soil function capacity of agricultural lands and meadows. In order to increase the functional capacity of the soil, a soil management approach aimed at protection, improvement and sustainability must be adopted and implemented.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoderma Regional\",\"volume\":\"38 \",\"pages\":\"Article e00829\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoderma Regional\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352009424000762\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoderma Regional","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352009424000762","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土壤是不可或缺的重要自然资源,有必要采用适当的方法管理和监测土壤质量,以确保土壤的可持续性。本研究旨在确定土壤功能发生变化的不同土地用途的土壤质量现状。本研究在卡拉苏河流域进行,该流域面积为 19178 公顷,主要土壤为 Entisols,位于卡赫拉曼马拉什的安德里恩。土壤管理评估框架(SMAF)方法和主成分分析(PCA)被用来评估流域范围内的动态土壤质量。在对土壤质量进行评估时,根据土地利用和地形地貌,从共计 360 个表土层(0-30)中随机取样。土壤指标包括容重、团聚稳定性、总有机碳、pH 值、电导率、可利用磷(P)、钾(K)、可利用水量和充满水的孔隙体积,这些指标被选作最小数据集(MDS)。结果表明,林地的生产力、环境保护、废物回收质量得分和土壤质量综合指数均高于农田。根据专家意见,林地土壤质量综合指数为 0.86,作物地为 0.78,草地为 0.83;而根据 PCA 计算,林地土壤质量综合指数为 0.85,作物地为 0.79,草地为 0.78。土壤功能对管理目标的贡献水平在水分关系功能中体现得最为明显。水关系功能对生产力、环境保护和废物循环管理目标的贡献率在林地分别为 0.38、0.32 和 0.34,在耕地分别为 0.42、0.33 和 0.35;在草地分别为 0.40、0.33 和 0.36。生产力、环境保护和废物循环管理目标对土壤质量的贡献率在林地分别为 30%、37% 和 33%;在农田分别为 29%、37% 和 34%;在草地分别为 30%、36% 和 34%。流域内的暴雨、错误的农业耕作方式(过度施肥和灌溉、不当耕作和作物选择等)以及过度放牧等负面影响导致土壤退化和水土流失,降低了农田和草地的土壤功能容量。为了提高土壤的功能能力,必须采取和实施旨在保护、改良和可持续发展的土壤管理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating dynamic soil quality by the soil management assessment framework (SMAF) in the watershed scale in a semi-arid Mediterranean ecosystem in Turkey

Soil is an indispensable and important natural resource and it is necessary to manage and monitor soil quality with appropriate methods in order to ensure the sustainability of the soil. The aim of this study is to determine the current state of soil quality in different land uses where soil functions change. This study was carried out in the Karasu river watershed with an area of 19,178 ha where Entisols soil order is dominant, located Andırın, Kahramanmaraş. The Soil Management Assessment Framework (SMAF) method and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used to assess the dynamic soil quality in watershed scale. In the evaluation of soil quality, random samples were taken from a total of 360 topsoil layers (0−30) according to land use and physiography. Soil indicators such as bulk density, aggregate stability, total organic carbon, pH, electrical conductivity, available phosphorus (P), potassium (K), available water amount and water-filled pore volume were selected to create the minimum data set (MDS). The results showed that the productivity, environmental protection, waste recycling quality scores and general soil quality index of forest lands are higher than agricultural lands. According to expert opinion, general soil quality scores were found to be 0.86 in forest land, 0.78 in crop land and 0.83 in grassland, while in PCA, general soil quality scores were calculated as 0.85 in forest land, 0.79 in crop land and 0.78 in grassland. Contribution level of soil functions to management targets was observed in water relations function the most. The contribution levels of the water relations function to the productivity, environmental protection and waste recycling management targets are 0.38, 0.32 and 0.34 in forest lands, 0.42, 0.33 and 0.35 in croplands, respectively; It was showed that 0.40, 0.33 and 0.36 in grasslands. Contribution rates of productivity, environmental protection and waste recycling management targets to soil quality were 30%, 37% and 33%, respectively, in forest lands; 29%, 37% and 34% in crop lands; It has been determined as 30%, 36% and 34% in the grasslands. Negative effects such as heavy rainfall in the watershed, wrong agricultural practices (excessive fertilization and irrigation, improper tillage, and crop selection, etc.) and excessive grazing have led to soil degradation and erosion, reducing the soil function capacity of agricultural lands and meadows. In order to increase the functional capacity of the soil, a soil management approach aimed at protection, improvement and sustainability must be adopted and implemented.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geoderma Regional
Geoderma Regional Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Soil Science
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.30%
发文量
122
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Global issues require studies and solutions on national and regional levels. Geoderma Regional focuses on studies that increase understanding and advance our scientific knowledge of soils in all regions of the world. The journal embraces every aspect of soil science and welcomes reviews of regional progress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信