{"title":"作为四曲面的失效包络的应力不变式和不变式:它们在制定合理失效标准中的意义","authors":"Shuguang Li","doi":"10.1016/j.mechmat.2024.105076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>When stress invariants up to the second order are employed to construct failure criterion for brittle materials, it involves three independent terms and therefore there are three coefficients to be determined. However, there are only two conditions available associated with the strengths under uniaxial tension and compression. Systematic examinations have given to the invariants of the failure envelope as a quadric surface according to analytic geometry. For the failure envelope to meet the basic assumptions, in particular, infinite strength under and only under hydrostatic compression, one of the coefficients can be eliminated based on rigorous mathematical inferences. As a result, it reproduces the Raghava-Caddell-Yeh criterion, which has never been rationally established before but is now in this paper. The failure envelope takes the form of circular paraboloid for brittle materials in general. The criterion degenerates to the von Mises criterion, giving a circular cylindrical failure envelope for ductile materials as a special case. It is as rational as the von Mises criterion in the sense that the assumptions made and the conditions available are logically sufficient for the complete establishment of the failure criterion without any ambiguity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18296,"journal":{"name":"Mechanics of Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stress invariants and invariants of the failure envelope as a quadric surface: Their significances in the formulation of a rational failure criterion\",\"authors\":\"Shuguang Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mechmat.2024.105076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>When stress invariants up to the second order are employed to construct failure criterion for brittle materials, it involves three independent terms and therefore there are three coefficients to be determined. However, there are only two conditions available associated with the strengths under uniaxial tension and compression. Systematic examinations have given to the invariants of the failure envelope as a quadric surface according to analytic geometry. For the failure envelope to meet the basic assumptions, in particular, infinite strength under and only under hydrostatic compression, one of the coefficients can be eliminated based on rigorous mathematical inferences. As a result, it reproduces the Raghava-Caddell-Yeh criterion, which has never been rationally established before but is now in this paper. The failure envelope takes the form of circular paraboloid for brittle materials in general. The criterion degenerates to the von Mises criterion, giving a circular cylindrical failure envelope for ductile materials as a special case. It is as rational as the von Mises criterion in the sense that the assumptions made and the conditions available are logically sufficient for the complete establishment of the failure criterion without any ambiguity.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mechanics of Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mechanics of Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167663624001686\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mechanics of Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167663624001686","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
当采用二阶以下的应力不变式来构建脆性材料的失效准则时,涉及三个独立项,因此有三个系数需要确定。然而,只有两个条件与单轴拉伸和压缩下的强度相关。根据解析几何,对作为四曲面的破坏包络的不变量进行了系统研究。为了使破坏包络符合基本假设,特别是在静水压力下且仅在静水压力下的无限强度,可以根据严格的数学推论消除其中一个系数。因此,它再现了 Raghava-Caddell-Yeh 准则,该准则以前从未被合理地确定过,但在本文中得到了证实。对于一般脆性材料而言,失效包络线呈圆抛物面形式。该判据退化为 von Mises 判据,对于韧性材料的特殊情况,给出了一个圆柱形破坏包络。它与 von Mises 准则一样合理,因为所做的假设和可用的条件在逻辑上足以完全确定失效准则,而不会有任何歧义。
Stress invariants and invariants of the failure envelope as a quadric surface: Their significances in the formulation of a rational failure criterion
When stress invariants up to the second order are employed to construct failure criterion for brittle materials, it involves three independent terms and therefore there are three coefficients to be determined. However, there are only two conditions available associated with the strengths under uniaxial tension and compression. Systematic examinations have given to the invariants of the failure envelope as a quadric surface according to analytic geometry. For the failure envelope to meet the basic assumptions, in particular, infinite strength under and only under hydrostatic compression, one of the coefficients can be eliminated based on rigorous mathematical inferences. As a result, it reproduces the Raghava-Caddell-Yeh criterion, which has never been rationally established before but is now in this paper. The failure envelope takes the form of circular paraboloid for brittle materials in general. The criterion degenerates to the von Mises criterion, giving a circular cylindrical failure envelope for ductile materials as a special case. It is as rational as the von Mises criterion in the sense that the assumptions made and the conditions available are logically sufficient for the complete establishment of the failure criterion without any ambiguity.
期刊介绍:
Mechanics of Materials is a forum for original scientific research on the flow, fracture, and general constitutive behavior of geophysical, geotechnical and technological materials, with balanced coverage of advanced technological and natural materials, with balanced coverage of theoretical, experimental, and field investigations. Of special concern are macroscopic predictions based on microscopic models, identification of microscopic structures from limited overall macroscopic data, experimental and field results that lead to fundamental understanding of the behavior of materials, and coordinated experimental and analytical investigations that culminate in theories with predictive quality.