论作为二元选择随机效用模型的线性概率模型

IF 2.8 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Paolo Delle Site, Janak Parmar
{"title":"论作为二元选择随机效用模型的线性概率模型","authors":"Paolo Delle Site,&nbsp;Janak Parmar","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2024.100505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The econometrics of the Linear Probability Model (LPM) cast as binary choice random utility model and where probabilities are constrained in the [0,1] interval is unexplored. The paper fills this gap. Assumptions are identified under which constrained maximum likelihood estimators exist and are unique, consistent and asymptotically normal. A consistent estimator of the covariance matrix is provided. Statistics that can be used to evaluate the prediction validity of binary choice models are reviewed. With income independent choices, the LPM has the merit of closed-form welfare change measure for the sub-population of consumers shifting from one alternative to the other. Two datasets illustrate the theoretical insights. One from the Swiss Mobility and Transport Microcensus related to choices between teleworking and commuting, one from the German Socio-Economic Panel related to add-on health insurance subscription. The signs and statistical significance at 5% level of the coefficients are concordant across LPM, Logit and Probit. Model prioritization based on prediction validity is data specific and dependent on the statistics used.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46863,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Choice Modelling","volume":"52 ","pages":"Article 100505"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Linear Probability Model as binary choice random utility model\",\"authors\":\"Paolo Delle Site,&nbsp;Janak Parmar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jocm.2024.100505\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The econometrics of the Linear Probability Model (LPM) cast as binary choice random utility model and where probabilities are constrained in the [0,1] interval is unexplored. The paper fills this gap. Assumptions are identified under which constrained maximum likelihood estimators exist and are unique, consistent and asymptotically normal. A consistent estimator of the covariance matrix is provided. Statistics that can be used to evaluate the prediction validity of binary choice models are reviewed. With income independent choices, the LPM has the merit of closed-form welfare change measure for the sub-population of consumers shifting from one alternative to the other. Two datasets illustrate the theoretical insights. One from the Swiss Mobility and Transport Microcensus related to choices between teleworking and commuting, one from the German Socio-Economic Panel related to add-on health insurance subscription. The signs and statistical significance at 5% level of the coefficients are concordant across LPM, Logit and Probit. Model prioritization based on prediction validity is data specific and dependent on the statistics used.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Choice Modelling\",\"volume\":\"52 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100505\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Choice Modelling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175553452400037X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Choice Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175553452400037X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

线性概率模型(LPM)被视为二元选择随机效用模型,且概率被限制在 [0,1] 区间内,但该模型的计量经济学尚未得到研究。本文填补了这一空白。本文确定了一些假设条件,在这些假设条件下,受限最大似然估计值是存在的,并且是唯一的、一致的和渐近正态的。提供了协方差矩阵的一致估计器。回顾了可用于评估二元选择模型预测有效性的统计数据。在收入与选择无关的情况下,LPM 的优点是可以对从一种选择转向另一种选择的消费者子群体进行闭式福利变化测量。两个数据集说明了理论上的见解。一个数据集来自瑞士流动性和交通微观普查,涉及远程办公和通勤之间的选择;另一个数据集来自德国社会经济小组,涉及附加医疗保险订阅。在 LPM、Logit 和 Probit 模型中,系数的符号和在 5%水平上的统计显著性是一致的。基于预测有效性的模型优先排序与数据有关,并取决于所使用的统计数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the Linear Probability Model as binary choice random utility model

The econometrics of the Linear Probability Model (LPM) cast as binary choice random utility model and where probabilities are constrained in the [0,1] interval is unexplored. The paper fills this gap. Assumptions are identified under which constrained maximum likelihood estimators exist and are unique, consistent and asymptotically normal. A consistent estimator of the covariance matrix is provided. Statistics that can be used to evaluate the prediction validity of binary choice models are reviewed. With income independent choices, the LPM has the merit of closed-form welfare change measure for the sub-population of consumers shifting from one alternative to the other. Two datasets illustrate the theoretical insights. One from the Swiss Mobility and Transport Microcensus related to choices between teleworking and commuting, one from the German Socio-Economic Panel related to add-on health insurance subscription. The signs and statistical significance at 5% level of the coefficients are concordant across LPM, Logit and Probit. Model prioritization based on prediction validity is data specific and dependent on the statistics used.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信