{"title":"转型中的领域:肝移植定性健康研究的范围审查和主题网络图","authors":"Selena Zhang , Chloe Wong-Mersereau , Ani Orchanian-Cheff , Maryam Makki , Shikha Gandhi , Kelly Fritsch , Mamatha Bhat , Suze Berkhout","doi":"10.1016/j.liver.2024.100233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND</h3><p>In liver transplantation, qualitative methodologies can offer important insights from a range of perspectives into the meaning and impact of health experiences. This review aims to characterize the existing qualitative research in liver transplantation to understand how this work has evolved over time, its contribution to understanding clinical issues, and to conceptualize under-developed areas for future research.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>Studies from MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched from database inception to January 2024. All English language studies focused on a liver transplant population with qualitative methodological components were included. Using VOSviewer network mapping software we constructed a visualization of the thematic networks within included studies.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>Our initial search yielded 9092 studies from which 229 were included in the final review. Data extraction revealed significant increases in the publication of qualitative studies since 2015, predominantly utilizing interviews and focus groups. The thematic network map we constructed placed “social support” as a dominant and central concept across many different studies, with related themes tending to cluster within four domains of research: <em>Care of the Organ & Patienthood; Identity, Embodiment, Adjustment; Relational & Ethical Issues; Existential Themes</em>. Medicalized subject such as “self-management” were less well-networked with identity-related, ethical, and existential topics.</p></div><div><h3>DISCUSSION</h3><p>There is a growing body of rich qualitative research in liver transplantation. Future research would benefit from more longitudinal approaches as well as increased attention to the interrelation between “clinical” issues (adherence, quality of life) and ethical, relational, and existential ones.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100799,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Liver Transplantation","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100233"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666967624000345/pdfft?md5=90219842834346a9477c0d9c9686c126&pid=1-s2.0-S2666967624000345-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Field in Transition: A Scoping Review and Thematic Network Map of Qualitative Health Research in Liver Transplantation\",\"authors\":\"Selena Zhang , Chloe Wong-Mersereau , Ani Orchanian-Cheff , Maryam Makki , Shikha Gandhi , Kelly Fritsch , Mamatha Bhat , Suze Berkhout\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.liver.2024.100233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>BACKGROUND</h3><p>In liver transplantation, qualitative methodologies can offer important insights from a range of perspectives into the meaning and impact of health experiences. This review aims to characterize the existing qualitative research in liver transplantation to understand how this work has evolved over time, its contribution to understanding clinical issues, and to conceptualize under-developed areas for future research.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>Studies from MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched from database inception to January 2024. All English language studies focused on a liver transplant population with qualitative methodological components were included. Using VOSviewer network mapping software we constructed a visualization of the thematic networks within included studies.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>Our initial search yielded 9092 studies from which 229 were included in the final review. Data extraction revealed significant increases in the publication of qualitative studies since 2015, predominantly utilizing interviews and focus groups. The thematic network map we constructed placed “social support” as a dominant and central concept across many different studies, with related themes tending to cluster within four domains of research: <em>Care of the Organ & Patienthood; Identity, Embodiment, Adjustment; Relational & Ethical Issues; Existential Themes</em>. Medicalized subject such as “self-management” were less well-networked with identity-related, ethical, and existential topics.</p></div><div><h3>DISCUSSION</h3><p>There is a growing body of rich qualitative research in liver transplantation. Future research would benefit from more longitudinal approaches as well as increased attention to the interrelation between “clinical” issues (adherence, quality of life) and ethical, relational, and existential ones.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Liver Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100233\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666967624000345/pdfft?md5=90219842834346a9477c0d9c9686c126&pid=1-s2.0-S2666967624000345-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Liver Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666967624000345\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Liver Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666967624000345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景在肝脏移植中,定性方法可以从不同的角度对健康体验的意义和影响提供重要的见解。本综述旨在描述肝移植领域现有定性研究的特点,以了解这项工作随着时间的推移是如何发展的、它对理解临床问题的贡献,以及对未来研究中尚未充分开发的领域进行构思。方法检索了从数据库开始到 2024 年 1 月的 MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane 系统性综述数据库、CENTRAL、CINAHL 和 Web of Science 中的研究。所有以肝移植人群为研究对象、采用定性方法的英文研究均被纳入其中。我们使用 VOSviewer 网络映射软件构建了所纳入研究的可视化主题网络。数据提取结果表明,自 2015 年以来,主要利用访谈和焦点小组发表的定性研究成果大幅增加。在我们构建的主题网络图中,"社会支持 "是许多不同研究的主导和核心概念,相关主题往往集中在四个研究领域:器官护理与患者身份;身份、体现、适应;关系与伦理问题;存在主义主题。医疗化主题,如 "自我管理",与身份相关、伦理和存在性主题之间的联系较少。未来的研究将受益于更多的纵向研究方法,以及对 "临床 "问题(依从性、生活质量)与伦理、关系和生存问题之间相互关系的更多关注。
A Field in Transition: A Scoping Review and Thematic Network Map of Qualitative Health Research in Liver Transplantation
BACKGROUND
In liver transplantation, qualitative methodologies can offer important insights from a range of perspectives into the meaning and impact of health experiences. This review aims to characterize the existing qualitative research in liver transplantation to understand how this work has evolved over time, its contribution to understanding clinical issues, and to conceptualize under-developed areas for future research.
METHODS
Studies from MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched from database inception to January 2024. All English language studies focused on a liver transplant population with qualitative methodological components were included. Using VOSviewer network mapping software we constructed a visualization of the thematic networks within included studies.
RESULTS
Our initial search yielded 9092 studies from which 229 were included in the final review. Data extraction revealed significant increases in the publication of qualitative studies since 2015, predominantly utilizing interviews and focus groups. The thematic network map we constructed placed “social support” as a dominant and central concept across many different studies, with related themes tending to cluster within four domains of research: Care of the Organ & Patienthood; Identity, Embodiment, Adjustment; Relational & Ethical Issues; Existential Themes. Medicalized subject such as “self-management” were less well-networked with identity-related, ethical, and existential topics.
DISCUSSION
There is a growing body of rich qualitative research in liver transplantation. Future research would benefit from more longitudinal approaches as well as increased attention to the interrelation between “clinical” issues (adherence, quality of life) and ethical, relational, and existential ones.