驾驭情境与冲突--从赫德加德框架的视角研究无缝移动学习

IF 2 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Imogen Casebourne
{"title":"驾驭情境与冲突--从赫德加德框架的视角研究无缝移动学习","authors":"Imogen Casebourne","doi":"10.1016/j.lcsi.2024.100837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article describes the use of Hedegaard's framework to analyse the seamless mobile learning practices of working adults in the UK by focusing on affordances and demands experienced in <em>activity settings</em> embedded within <em>institutions</em>. An exploration of publicly accessible blogs, reports, and anonymised usage data from e-learning accessed via mobile devices was used to formulate an understanding of institutional practices and values. Following this, a survey involving 50 participants was conducted, complemented by semi-structured interviews with 24 learners and additional institutional stakeholders. These various sources of data were examined holistically, to understand the ways in which conflicts and contradictions at varying levels and between the different institutions traversed by individuals, shaped their learning practices. The findings indicated that seamless mobile learning may be influenced by a variety of conflicts and contradictions, (including between individuals and institutions, between distinct institutions and within institutions), as well by the immediate physical and social affordances of learning settings. They also pointed to a distinction between conflicts related to what was learned and those related to how learning occurred. Hedegaard's framework provided a valuable lens for investigating the complexities of work-related learning taking place across multiple settings and her concepts of <em>setting</em> and <em>institution</em> are useful conceptual tools for future research into the self-directed seamless mobile learning of adults. The adoption of the framework facilitated the development of novel frameworks for the design of seamless mobile learning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46850,"journal":{"name":"Learning Culture and Social Interaction","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 100837"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221065612400045X/pdfft?md5=98370f8a1f48df6b4019b5bc78801f45&pid=1-s2.0-S221065612400045X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating context and conflict – Investigating seamless mobile learning through the lens of Hedegaard's framework\",\"authors\":\"Imogen Casebourne\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lcsi.2024.100837\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This article describes the use of Hedegaard's framework to analyse the seamless mobile learning practices of working adults in the UK by focusing on affordances and demands experienced in <em>activity settings</em> embedded within <em>institutions</em>. An exploration of publicly accessible blogs, reports, and anonymised usage data from e-learning accessed via mobile devices was used to formulate an understanding of institutional practices and values. Following this, a survey involving 50 participants was conducted, complemented by semi-structured interviews with 24 learners and additional institutional stakeholders. These various sources of data were examined holistically, to understand the ways in which conflicts and contradictions at varying levels and between the different institutions traversed by individuals, shaped their learning practices. The findings indicated that seamless mobile learning may be influenced by a variety of conflicts and contradictions, (including between individuals and institutions, between distinct institutions and within institutions), as well by the immediate physical and social affordances of learning settings. They also pointed to a distinction between conflicts related to what was learned and those related to how learning occurred. Hedegaard's framework provided a valuable lens for investigating the complexities of work-related learning taking place across multiple settings and her concepts of <em>setting</em> and <em>institution</em> are useful conceptual tools for future research into the self-directed seamless mobile learning of adults. The adoption of the framework facilitated the development of novel frameworks for the design of seamless mobile learning.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning Culture and Social Interaction\",\"volume\":\"47 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100837\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221065612400045X/pdfft?md5=98370f8a1f48df6b4019b5bc78801f45&pid=1-s2.0-S221065612400045X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning Culture and Social Interaction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221065612400045X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Culture and Social Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221065612400045X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了使用赫德加德的框架来分析英国在职成人的无缝移动学习实践,重点关注嵌入机构内的活动环境中体验到的承受能力和需求。通过对公开的博客、报告以及通过移动设备进行电子学习的匿名使用数据的探索,形成了对机构实践和价值观的理解。随后,对 50 名参与者进行了调查,并对 24 名学习者和其他机构利益相关者进行了半结构化访谈。对这些不同来源的数据进行了全面研究,以了解个人在不同层面和不同机构之间的冲突和矛盾是如何影响他们的学习实践的。研究结果表明,无缝移动学习可能受到各种冲突和矛盾(包括个人与机构之间、不同机构之间和机构内部的冲突和矛盾)以及学习环境的直接物质和社会条件的影响。他们还指出了与学习内容有关的冲突和与学习方式有关的冲突之间的区别。赫德加德的框架为研究在多种环境中进行的与工作相关的学习的复杂性提供了一个有价值的视角,她的环境和机构的概念是未来研究成人自主无缝移动学习的有用的概念工具。采用该框架有助于为无缝移动学习的设计开发新的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Navigating context and conflict – Investigating seamless mobile learning through the lens of Hedegaard's framework

This article describes the use of Hedegaard's framework to analyse the seamless mobile learning practices of working adults in the UK by focusing on affordances and demands experienced in activity settings embedded within institutions. An exploration of publicly accessible blogs, reports, and anonymised usage data from e-learning accessed via mobile devices was used to formulate an understanding of institutional practices and values. Following this, a survey involving 50 participants was conducted, complemented by semi-structured interviews with 24 learners and additional institutional stakeholders. These various sources of data were examined holistically, to understand the ways in which conflicts and contradictions at varying levels and between the different institutions traversed by individuals, shaped their learning practices. The findings indicated that seamless mobile learning may be influenced by a variety of conflicts and contradictions, (including between individuals and institutions, between distinct institutions and within institutions), as well by the immediate physical and social affordances of learning settings. They also pointed to a distinction between conflicts related to what was learned and those related to how learning occurred. Hedegaard's framework provided a valuable lens for investigating the complexities of work-related learning taking place across multiple settings and her concepts of setting and institution are useful conceptual tools for future research into the self-directed seamless mobile learning of adults. The adoption of the framework facilitated the development of novel frameworks for the design of seamless mobile learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Learning Culture and Social Interaction
Learning Culture and Social Interaction EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
50
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信