非洲的社会经济评估和转基因作物:为发展积累知识?

IF 9.8 1区 经济学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Brian Dowd-Uribe , Genowefa Blundo-Canto , Dominic Glover , Sélim Louafi , Helena Shilomboleni , Joeva Sean Rock , Enoch M. Kikulwe , Klara Fischer , Pierre-Benoît Joly
{"title":"非洲的社会经济评估和转基因作物:为发展积累知识?","authors":"Brian Dowd-Uribe ,&nbsp;Genowefa Blundo-Canto ,&nbsp;Dominic Glover ,&nbsp;Sélim Louafi ,&nbsp;Helena Shilomboleni ,&nbsp;Joeva Sean Rock ,&nbsp;Enoch M. Kikulwe ,&nbsp;Klara Fischer ,&nbsp;Pierre-Benoît Joly","doi":"10.1016/j.gfs.2024.100782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>How could we know if agricultural development interventions make contributions to sustainable development goals (SDGs)? Genetically engineered (GE) crops are celebrated as a class of technological interventions that can realize multiple SDGs. But recent studies have revealed the gap between GE crop program goals and the approaches used to assess their impacts. Using four comprehensive reviews of GE crop socio-economic impacts, we identify common shortcomings across three themes: (a) scope, (b) approaches and (c) heterogeneity. We find that the evaluation sciences literature offers alternative assessment approaches that can enable evaluators to better assess impacts, and inform learning and decision-making. We recommend the use of methods that enable evaluations to look beyond the agronomic and productive effects of individual traits to understand wider socio-economic effects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48741,"journal":{"name":"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100782"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211912424000440/pdfft?md5=ed317cd3081c990d8c5e93fb33c80334&pid=1-s2.0-S2211912424000440-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socio-economic assessment and genetically engineered crops in Africa: Building knowledge for development?\",\"authors\":\"Brian Dowd-Uribe ,&nbsp;Genowefa Blundo-Canto ,&nbsp;Dominic Glover ,&nbsp;Sélim Louafi ,&nbsp;Helena Shilomboleni ,&nbsp;Joeva Sean Rock ,&nbsp;Enoch M. Kikulwe ,&nbsp;Klara Fischer ,&nbsp;Pierre-Benoît Joly\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gfs.2024.100782\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>How could we know if agricultural development interventions make contributions to sustainable development goals (SDGs)? Genetically engineered (GE) crops are celebrated as a class of technological interventions that can realize multiple SDGs. But recent studies have revealed the gap between GE crop program goals and the approaches used to assess their impacts. Using four comprehensive reviews of GE crop socio-economic impacts, we identify common shortcomings across three themes: (a) scope, (b) approaches and (c) heterogeneity. We find that the evaluation sciences literature offers alternative assessment approaches that can enable evaluators to better assess impacts, and inform learning and decision-making. We recommend the use of methods that enable evaluations to look beyond the agronomic and productive effects of individual traits to understand wider socio-economic effects.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment\",\"volume\":\"42 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100782\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211912424000440/pdfft?md5=ed317cd3081c990d8c5e93fb33c80334&pid=1-s2.0-S2211912424000440-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211912424000440\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211912424000440","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们如何才能知道农业发展干预措施是否有助于实现可持续发展目标(SDGs)?转基因(GE)作物作为一类可以实现多个可持续发展目标的技术干预措施而备受赞誉。但最近的研究揭示了基因工程作物计划目标与评估其影响的方法之间的差距。通过对四篇有关转基因作物社会经济影响的综合评论,我们发现了以下三个主题的共同缺陷:(a)范围、(b)方法和(c)异质性。我们发现,评估科学文献提供了可供选择的评估方法,使评估人员能够更好地评估影响,并为学习和决策提供信息。我们建议使用一些方法,使评估工作能够超越单个性状对农艺和生产的影响,了解更广泛的社会经济影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Socio-economic assessment and genetically engineered crops in Africa: Building knowledge for development?

How could we know if agricultural development interventions make contributions to sustainable development goals (SDGs)? Genetically engineered (GE) crops are celebrated as a class of technological interventions that can realize multiple SDGs. But recent studies have revealed the gap between GE crop program goals and the approaches used to assess their impacts. Using four comprehensive reviews of GE crop socio-economic impacts, we identify common shortcomings across three themes: (a) scope, (b) approaches and (c) heterogeneity. We find that the evaluation sciences literature offers alternative assessment approaches that can enable evaluators to better assess impacts, and inform learning and decision-making. We recommend the use of methods that enable evaluations to look beyond the agronomic and productive effects of individual traits to understand wider socio-economic effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Global Food Security plays a vital role in addressing food security challenges from local to global levels. To secure food systems, it emphasizes multifaceted actions considering technological, biophysical, institutional, economic, social, and political factors. The goal is to foster food systems that meet nutritional needs, preserve the environment, support livelihoods, tackle climate change, and diminish inequalities. This journal serves as a platform for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners to access and engage with recent, diverse research and perspectives on achieving sustainable food security globally. It aspires to be an internationally recognized resource presenting cutting-edge insights in an accessible manner to a broad audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信