基于动态增强加权排水集水盆地法的河流沉积物地球化学异常绘图用于矿产勘探

IF 3.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Chang Liu , Renwei Zhu , Shi Li , Zijia Cui , Jianping Chen , Jie Zhao
{"title":"基于动态增强加权排水集水盆地法的河流沉积物地球化学异常绘图用于矿产勘探","authors":"Chang Liu ,&nbsp;Renwei Zhu ,&nbsp;Shi Li ,&nbsp;Zijia Cui ,&nbsp;Jianping Chen ,&nbsp;Jie Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.gexplo.2024.107535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Accurately determining the presence of subterranean deposits is challenging due to the intricate geological processes that give rise to these deposits. The use of stream sediment geochemical data to identify and map geochemical anomalies is a widely employed technique in mineral exploration and offers a robust indicator of the possible presence of mineral deposits. This research presents a comparison between the weighted drainage catchment basin (WDCB) technique and its improved version, the dynamic enhanced weighted drainage catchment basin (DE-WDCB) approach, in the context of mineral exploration. We constructed a model of the catchment basin for the study area, clarified the upstream and downstream relationships between the basins, determined the background value in each basin via the trend surface method, and carried out geochemical anomaly mapping based on the DE-WDCB method. Then we conducted two comparative experiments using the WDCB method, employing both dynamic and nondynamic classification methods for anomaly classification. Finally, we compared the mineralization of the three methods and find that the DE-WDCB method exhibited superior performance in identifying sedimentary manganese ore anomalies, followed by the dynamic grading WDCB method and the nondynamic grading WDCB method. These results indicated that the DE-WDCB method revealed excellent performance when applied to stream sediment geochemistry in prospecting, hence enhancing its utility in mineral resource exploration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16336,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geochemical Exploration","volume":"264 ","pages":"Article 107535"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stream sediment geochemical anomaly mapping based on the dynamic enhanced weighted drainage catchment basin method for mineral exploration\",\"authors\":\"Chang Liu ,&nbsp;Renwei Zhu ,&nbsp;Shi Li ,&nbsp;Zijia Cui ,&nbsp;Jianping Chen ,&nbsp;Jie Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gexplo.2024.107535\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Accurately determining the presence of subterranean deposits is challenging due to the intricate geological processes that give rise to these deposits. The use of stream sediment geochemical data to identify and map geochemical anomalies is a widely employed technique in mineral exploration and offers a robust indicator of the possible presence of mineral deposits. This research presents a comparison between the weighted drainage catchment basin (WDCB) technique and its improved version, the dynamic enhanced weighted drainage catchment basin (DE-WDCB) approach, in the context of mineral exploration. We constructed a model of the catchment basin for the study area, clarified the upstream and downstream relationships between the basins, determined the background value in each basin via the trend surface method, and carried out geochemical anomaly mapping based on the DE-WDCB method. Then we conducted two comparative experiments using the WDCB method, employing both dynamic and nondynamic classification methods for anomaly classification. Finally, we compared the mineralization of the three methods and find that the DE-WDCB method exhibited superior performance in identifying sedimentary manganese ore anomalies, followed by the dynamic grading WDCB method and the nondynamic grading WDCB method. These results indicated that the DE-WDCB method revealed excellent performance when applied to stream sediment geochemistry in prospecting, hence enhancing its utility in mineral resource exploration.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geochemical Exploration\",\"volume\":\"264 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107535\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geochemical Exploration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375674224001511\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geochemical Exploration","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375674224001511","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于形成地下矿藏的地质过程错综复杂,因此准确确定这些矿藏的存在具有挑战性。利用溪流沉积物地球化学数据来识别和绘制地球化学异常是矿产勘探中广泛采用的一种技术,它为矿床的可能存在提供了一个可靠的指标。本研究以矿产勘探为背景,比较了加权排水集水盆地(WDCB)技术及其改进版--动态增强加权排水集水盆地(DE-WDCB)方法。我们构建了研究区域的集水盆地模型,明确了盆地之间的上下游关系,通过趋势面法确定了各盆地的背景值,并基于 DE-WDCB 方法进行了地球化学异常绘图。然后,我们利用 WDCB 方法进行了两次对比实验,采用动态和非动态分类方法进行异常分类。最后,我们比较了三种方法的成矿情况,发现 DE-WDCB 方法在识别沉积锰矿异常方面表现优异,其次是动态分级 WDCB 方法和非动态分级 WDCB 方法。这些结果表明,DE-WDCB 方法在应用于勘探溪流沉积物地球化学时表现出优异的性能,从而提高了其在矿产资源勘探中的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stream sediment geochemical anomaly mapping based on the dynamic enhanced weighted drainage catchment basin method for mineral exploration

Accurately determining the presence of subterranean deposits is challenging due to the intricate geological processes that give rise to these deposits. The use of stream sediment geochemical data to identify and map geochemical anomalies is a widely employed technique in mineral exploration and offers a robust indicator of the possible presence of mineral deposits. This research presents a comparison between the weighted drainage catchment basin (WDCB) technique and its improved version, the dynamic enhanced weighted drainage catchment basin (DE-WDCB) approach, in the context of mineral exploration. We constructed a model of the catchment basin for the study area, clarified the upstream and downstream relationships between the basins, determined the background value in each basin via the trend surface method, and carried out geochemical anomaly mapping based on the DE-WDCB method. Then we conducted two comparative experiments using the WDCB method, employing both dynamic and nondynamic classification methods for anomaly classification. Finally, we compared the mineralization of the three methods and find that the DE-WDCB method exhibited superior performance in identifying sedimentary manganese ore anomalies, followed by the dynamic grading WDCB method and the nondynamic grading WDCB method. These results indicated that the DE-WDCB method revealed excellent performance when applied to stream sediment geochemistry in prospecting, hence enhancing its utility in mineral resource exploration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geochemical Exploration
Journal of Geochemical Exploration 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
148
审稿时长
8.1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Geochemical Exploration is mostly dedicated to publication of original studies in exploration and environmental geochemistry and related topics. Contributions considered of prevalent interest for the journal include researches based on the application of innovative methods to: define the genesis and the evolution of mineral deposits including transfer of elements in large-scale mineralized areas. analyze complex systems at the boundaries between bio-geochemistry, metal transport and mineral accumulation. evaluate effects of historical mining activities on the surface environment. trace pollutant sources and define their fate and transport models in the near-surface and surface environments involving solid, fluid and aerial matrices. assess and quantify natural and technogenic radioactivity in the environment. determine geochemical anomalies and set baseline reference values using compositional data analysis, multivariate statistics and geo-spatial analysis. assess the impacts of anthropogenic contamination on ecosystems and human health at local and regional scale to prioritize and classify risks through deterministic and stochastic approaches. Papers dedicated to the presentation of newly developed methods in analytical geochemistry to be applied in the field or in laboratory are also within the topics of interest for the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信