通过噬菌体介导的处理方法克服与粪便微生物群移植相关的供体变异性和风险。

IF 13.8 1区 生物学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Torben Sølbeck Rasmussen, Xiaotian Mao, Sarah Forster, Sabina Birgitte Larsen, Alexandra Von Münchow, Kaare Dyekær Tranæs, Anders Brunse, Frej Larsen, Josue Leonardo Castro Mejia, Signe Adamberg, Axel Kornerup Hansen, Kaarel Adamberg, Camilla Hartmann Friis Hansen, Dennis Sandris Nielsen
{"title":"通过噬菌体介导的处理方法克服与粪便微生物群移植相关的供体变异性和风险。","authors":"Torben Sølbeck Rasmussen, Xiaotian Mao, Sarah Forster, Sabina Birgitte Larsen, Alexandra Von Münchow, Kaare Dyekær Tranæs, Anders Brunse, Frej Larsen, Josue Leonardo Castro Mejia, Signe Adamberg, Axel Kornerup Hansen, Kaarel Adamberg, Camilla Hartmann Friis Hansen, Dennis Sandris Nielsen","doi":"10.1186/s40168-024-01820-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and fecal virome transplantation (FVT, sterile filtrated donor feces) have been effective in treating recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections, possibly through bacteriophage-mediated modulation of the gut microbiome. However, challenges like donor variability, costly screening, coupled with concerns over pathogen transfer (incl. eukaryotic viruses) with FMT or FVT hinder their wider clinical application in treating less acute diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To overcome these challenges, we developed methods to broaden FVT's clinical application while maintaining efficacy and increasing safety. Specifically, we employed the following approaches: (1) chemostat-fermentation to reproduce the bacteriophage FVT donor component and remove eukaryotic viruses (FVT-ChP), (2) solvent-detergent treatment to inactivate enveloped viruses (FVT-SDT), and (3) pyronin-Y treatment to inhibit RNA virus replication (FVT-PyT). We assessed the efficacy of these processed FVTs in a C. difficile infection mouse model and compared them with untreated FVT (FVT-UnT), FMT, and saline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FVT-SDT, FVT-UnT, and FVT-ChP reduced the incidence of mice reaching the humane endpoint (0/8, 2/7, and 3/8, respectively) compared to FMT, FVT-PyT, and saline (5/8, 7/8, and 5/7, respectively) and significantly reduced the load of colonizing C. difficile cells and associated toxin A/B levels. There was a potential elimination of C. difficile colonization, with seven out of eight mice treated with FVT-SDT testing negative with qPCR. In contrast, all other treatments exhibited the continued presence of C. difficile. Moreover, the results were supported by changes in the gut microbiome profiles, cecal cytokine levels, and histopathological findings. Assessment of viral engraftment following FMT/FVT treatment and host-phage correlations analysis suggested that transfer of phages likely were an important contributing factor associated with treatment efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This proof-of-concept study shows that specific modifications of FVT hold promise in addressing challenges related to donor variability and infection risks. Two strategies lead to treatments significantly limiting C. difficile colonization in mice, with solvent/detergent treatment and chemostat propagation of donor phages emerging as promising approaches. Video Abstract.</p>","PeriodicalId":18447,"journal":{"name":"Microbiome","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11218093/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Overcoming donor variability and risks associated with fecal microbiota transplants through bacteriophage-mediated treatments.\",\"authors\":\"Torben Sølbeck Rasmussen, Xiaotian Mao, Sarah Forster, Sabina Birgitte Larsen, Alexandra Von Münchow, Kaare Dyekær Tranæs, Anders Brunse, Frej Larsen, Josue Leonardo Castro Mejia, Signe Adamberg, Axel Kornerup Hansen, Kaarel Adamberg, Camilla Hartmann Friis Hansen, Dennis Sandris Nielsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40168-024-01820-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and fecal virome transplantation (FVT, sterile filtrated donor feces) have been effective in treating recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections, possibly through bacteriophage-mediated modulation of the gut microbiome. However, challenges like donor variability, costly screening, coupled with concerns over pathogen transfer (incl. eukaryotic viruses) with FMT or FVT hinder their wider clinical application in treating less acute diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To overcome these challenges, we developed methods to broaden FVT's clinical application while maintaining efficacy and increasing safety. Specifically, we employed the following approaches: (1) chemostat-fermentation to reproduce the bacteriophage FVT donor component and remove eukaryotic viruses (FVT-ChP), (2) solvent-detergent treatment to inactivate enveloped viruses (FVT-SDT), and (3) pyronin-Y treatment to inhibit RNA virus replication (FVT-PyT). We assessed the efficacy of these processed FVTs in a C. difficile infection mouse model and compared them with untreated FVT (FVT-UnT), FMT, and saline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FVT-SDT, FVT-UnT, and FVT-ChP reduced the incidence of mice reaching the humane endpoint (0/8, 2/7, and 3/8, respectively) compared to FMT, FVT-PyT, and saline (5/8, 7/8, and 5/7, respectively) and significantly reduced the load of colonizing C. difficile cells and associated toxin A/B levels. There was a potential elimination of C. difficile colonization, with seven out of eight mice treated with FVT-SDT testing negative with qPCR. In contrast, all other treatments exhibited the continued presence of C. difficile. Moreover, the results were supported by changes in the gut microbiome profiles, cecal cytokine levels, and histopathological findings. Assessment of viral engraftment following FMT/FVT treatment and host-phage correlations analysis suggested that transfer of phages likely were an important contributing factor associated with treatment efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This proof-of-concept study shows that specific modifications of FVT hold promise in addressing challenges related to donor variability and infection risks. Two strategies lead to treatments significantly limiting C. difficile colonization in mice, with solvent/detergent treatment and chemostat propagation of donor phages emerging as promising approaches. Video Abstract.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microbiome\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11218093/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microbiome\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-024-01820-1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiome","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-024-01820-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:粪便微生物组移植(FMT)和粪便病毒组移植(FVT,无菌过滤供体粪便)可能通过噬菌体介导的肠道微生物组调节,有效治疗艰难梭菌反复感染。然而,供体的可变性、昂贵的筛查费用以及对 FMT 或 FVT 病原体转移(包括真核病毒)的担忧等挑战阻碍了它们在治疗急性疾病方面的临床应用:为了克服这些挑战,我们开发了各种方法来扩大 FVT 的临床应用,同时保持其疗效并提高其安全性。具体来说,我们采用了以下方法:(1) 恒温发酵法复制噬菌体 FVT 供体成分并去除真核病毒(FVT-ChP);(2) 溶剂-洗涤剂处理法灭活包膜病毒(FVT-SDT);(3) 吡罗宁-Y 处理法抑制 RNA 病毒复制(FVT-PyT)。我们评估了这些经过处理的 FVT 在艰难梭菌感染小鼠模型中的疗效,并将它们与未经处理的 FVT(FVT-UnT)、FMT 和生理盐水进行了比较:结果:与 FMT、FVT-PyT 和生理盐水(分别为 5/8、7/8 和 5/7)相比,FVT-SDT、FVT-UnT 和 FVT-ChP 降低了达到人道终点的小鼠发病率(分别为 0/8、2/7 和 3/8),并显著降低了艰难梭菌定植细胞的负荷和相关毒素 A/B 的水平。经 FVT-SDT 处理的八只小鼠中有七只经 qPCR 检测为阴性,因此艰难梭菌的定植有可能被消除。相比之下,所有其他治疗方法都显示艰难梭菌继续存在。此外,肠道微生物组概况、盲肠细胞因子水平和组织病理学结果的变化也支持了上述结果。FMT/FVT治疗后的病毒移植评估和宿主-噬菌体相关性分析表明,噬菌体的转移可能是影响治疗效果的重要因素:这项概念验证研究表明,对 FVT 进行特定修改有望解决与供体变异和感染风险有关的难题。有两种策略可显著限制艰难梭菌在小鼠体内的定植,其中溶剂/洗涤剂处理和供体噬菌体恒温箱繁殖是很有前景的方法。视频摘要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Overcoming donor variability and risks associated with fecal microbiota transplants through bacteriophage-mediated treatments.

Background: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and fecal virome transplantation (FVT, sterile filtrated donor feces) have been effective in treating recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections, possibly through bacteriophage-mediated modulation of the gut microbiome. However, challenges like donor variability, costly screening, coupled with concerns over pathogen transfer (incl. eukaryotic viruses) with FMT or FVT hinder their wider clinical application in treating less acute diseases.

Methods: To overcome these challenges, we developed methods to broaden FVT's clinical application while maintaining efficacy and increasing safety. Specifically, we employed the following approaches: (1) chemostat-fermentation to reproduce the bacteriophage FVT donor component and remove eukaryotic viruses (FVT-ChP), (2) solvent-detergent treatment to inactivate enveloped viruses (FVT-SDT), and (3) pyronin-Y treatment to inhibit RNA virus replication (FVT-PyT). We assessed the efficacy of these processed FVTs in a C. difficile infection mouse model and compared them with untreated FVT (FVT-UnT), FMT, and saline.

Results: FVT-SDT, FVT-UnT, and FVT-ChP reduced the incidence of mice reaching the humane endpoint (0/8, 2/7, and 3/8, respectively) compared to FMT, FVT-PyT, and saline (5/8, 7/8, and 5/7, respectively) and significantly reduced the load of colonizing C. difficile cells and associated toxin A/B levels. There was a potential elimination of C. difficile colonization, with seven out of eight mice treated with FVT-SDT testing negative with qPCR. In contrast, all other treatments exhibited the continued presence of C. difficile. Moreover, the results were supported by changes in the gut microbiome profiles, cecal cytokine levels, and histopathological findings. Assessment of viral engraftment following FMT/FVT treatment and host-phage correlations analysis suggested that transfer of phages likely were an important contributing factor associated with treatment efficacy.

Conclusions: This proof-of-concept study shows that specific modifications of FVT hold promise in addressing challenges related to donor variability and infection risks. Two strategies lead to treatments significantly limiting C. difficile colonization in mice, with solvent/detergent treatment and chemostat propagation of donor phages emerging as promising approaches. Video Abstract.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Microbiome
Microbiome MICROBIOLOGY-
CiteScore
21.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
198
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Microbiome is a journal that focuses on studies of microbiomes in humans, animals, plants, and the environment. It covers both natural and manipulated microbiomes, such as those in agriculture. The journal is interested in research that uses meta-omics approaches or novel bioinformatics tools and emphasizes the community/host interaction and structure-function relationship within the microbiome. Studies that go beyond descriptive omics surveys and include experimental or theoretical approaches will be considered for publication. The journal also encourages research that establishes cause and effect relationships and supports proposed microbiome functions. However, studies of individual microbial isolates/species without exploring their impact on the host or the complex microbiome structures and functions will not be considered for publication. Microbiome is indexed in BIOSIS, Current Contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, and Science Citations Index Expanded.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信