免疫检查点抑制剂在晚期或复发性子宫内膜癌中的实际应用。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Sarah Huepenbecker, Larissa A Meyer, Miranda Craft, John K Chan, Christopher Craggs, Peter Lambert, Yvonne G Lin
{"title":"免疫检查点抑制剂在晚期或复发性子宫内膜癌中的实际应用。","authors":"Sarah Huepenbecker, Larissa A Meyer, Miranda Craft, John K Chan, Christopher Craggs, Peter Lambert, Yvonne G Lin","doi":"10.1136/ijgc-2024-005541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to describe real-world use of immune checkpoint inhibitors for women with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult women with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer who received at least one line of systemic treatment between January 1, 2014 and November 1, 2020, then followed to May 31, 2021 in a nationwide electronic health record-derived de-identified database. Chi-Squared test or Welch's 2-sample t-tests were used to compare patient and clinical factors associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. Time to next treatment analyses were performed based on the treatment line of the immune checkpoint inhibitor. Sankey plots depicted patient-level temporal systemic treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During our study period, 326 women received their first immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment, increasing from 12 patients in 2016 to 148 in 2020. Factors associated with ever receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors included disease stage (p=0.002), mismatch repair (MMR)/microsatellite instability (MSI) status (p<0.001), performance status (p=0.001), and prior radiation receipt (p<0.001) and modality (p=0.003). The most common immune checkpoint inhibitor regimen was pembrolizumab (47.9%) followed by pembrolizumab and lenvatinib (34.7%). Immune checkpoint inhibitors were given as first, second, and third or greater lines of therapy in 24.5%, 41.7%, and 46.1% of evaluable patients. The median time to next treatment was significantly longer if given as an earlier line of treatment (p=0.008). There were significant differences in treatment line of immune checkpoint inhibitor by region (p=0.004), stage (p<0.001), and prior radiation receipt (p=0.014) and modality (p=0.009). Among 326 patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors, 114 (34.9%) received subsequent treatment including chemotherapy (43.9%), additional immune checkpoint inhibitors (29.8%), and other (26.3%) with no differences in demographic or clinical characteristics based on the type of post-immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In an observational retrospective real-world database study, immune checkpoint inhibitors were used in 14.7% of patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer across multiple lines of treatment, including after initial immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"1719-1728"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Huepenbecker, Larissa A Meyer, Miranda Craft, John K Chan, Christopher Craggs, Peter Lambert, Yvonne G Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/ijgc-2024-005541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to describe real-world use of immune checkpoint inhibitors for women with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult women with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer who received at least one line of systemic treatment between January 1, 2014 and November 1, 2020, then followed to May 31, 2021 in a nationwide electronic health record-derived de-identified database. Chi-Squared test or Welch's 2-sample t-tests were used to compare patient and clinical factors associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. Time to next treatment analyses were performed based on the treatment line of the immune checkpoint inhibitor. Sankey plots depicted patient-level temporal systemic treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During our study period, 326 women received their first immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment, increasing from 12 patients in 2016 to 148 in 2020. Factors associated with ever receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors included disease stage (p=0.002), mismatch repair (MMR)/microsatellite instability (MSI) status (p<0.001), performance status (p=0.001), and prior radiation receipt (p<0.001) and modality (p=0.003). The most common immune checkpoint inhibitor regimen was pembrolizumab (47.9%) followed by pembrolizumab and lenvatinib (34.7%). Immune checkpoint inhibitors were given as first, second, and third or greater lines of therapy in 24.5%, 41.7%, and 46.1% of evaluable patients. The median time to next treatment was significantly longer if given as an earlier line of treatment (p=0.008). There were significant differences in treatment line of immune checkpoint inhibitor by region (p=0.004), stage (p<0.001), and prior radiation receipt (p=0.014) and modality (p=0.009). Among 326 patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors, 114 (34.9%) received subsequent treatment including chemotherapy (43.9%), additional immune checkpoint inhibitors (29.8%), and other (26.3%) with no differences in demographic or clinical characteristics based on the type of post-immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In an observational retrospective real-world database study, immune checkpoint inhibitors were used in 14.7% of patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer across multiple lines of treatment, including after initial immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1719-1728\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2024-005541\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2024-005541","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在描述晚期或复发性子宫内膜癌女性患者使用免疫检查点抑制剂的实际情况:2014年1月1日至2020年11月1日期间接受过至少一线系统治疗的晚期或复发性子宫内膜癌成年女性,然后在全国范围内的电子健康记录衍生去标识数据库中随访至2021年5月31日。在比较与免疫检查点抑制剂治疗相关的患者和临床因素时,采用了Chi-Squared检验或Welch's 2样本t检验。根据免疫检查点抑制剂的治疗方案进行下次治疗时间分析。桑基图描述了患者层面的系统治疗时间:在我们的研究期间,326名女性接受了首次免疫检查点抑制剂治疗,患者人数从2016年的12人增加到2020年的148人。曾接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的相关因素包括疾病分期(p=0.002)、错配修复(MMR)/微卫星不稳定性(MSI)状态(pConclusion):在一项观察性回顾性真实世界数据库研究中,14.7%的晚期或复发性子宫内膜癌患者在多线治疗(包括初始免疫检查点抑制剂治疗后)中使用了免疫检查点抑制剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-world use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer.

Objective: The aim of this study was to describe real-world use of immune checkpoint inhibitors for women with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer.

Methods: Adult women with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer who received at least one line of systemic treatment between January 1, 2014 and November 1, 2020, then followed to May 31, 2021 in a nationwide electronic health record-derived de-identified database. Chi-Squared test or Welch's 2-sample t-tests were used to compare patient and clinical factors associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. Time to next treatment analyses were performed based on the treatment line of the immune checkpoint inhibitor. Sankey plots depicted patient-level temporal systemic treatment.

Results: During our study period, 326 women received their first immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment, increasing from 12 patients in 2016 to 148 in 2020. Factors associated with ever receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors included disease stage (p=0.002), mismatch repair (MMR)/microsatellite instability (MSI) status (p<0.001), performance status (p=0.001), and prior radiation receipt (p<0.001) and modality (p=0.003). The most common immune checkpoint inhibitor regimen was pembrolizumab (47.9%) followed by pembrolizumab and lenvatinib (34.7%). Immune checkpoint inhibitors were given as first, second, and third or greater lines of therapy in 24.5%, 41.7%, and 46.1% of evaluable patients. The median time to next treatment was significantly longer if given as an earlier line of treatment (p=0.008). There were significant differences in treatment line of immune checkpoint inhibitor by region (p=0.004), stage (p<0.001), and prior radiation receipt (p=0.014) and modality (p=0.009). Among 326 patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors, 114 (34.9%) received subsequent treatment including chemotherapy (43.9%), additional immune checkpoint inhibitors (29.8%), and other (26.3%) with no differences in demographic or clinical characteristics based on the type of post-immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.

Conclusion: In an observational retrospective real-world database study, immune checkpoint inhibitors were used in 14.7% of patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer across multiple lines of treatment, including after initial immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信