定向探索在情感障碍中会增加,但在厌恶性互感状态诱导下会减少。

Ning Li, Claire A Lavalley, Ko-Ping Chou, Anne E Chuning, Samuel Taylor, Carter M Goldman, Taylor Torres, Rowan Hodson, Robert C Wilson, Jennifer L Stewart, Sahib S Khalsa, Martin P Paulus, Ryan Smith
{"title":"定向探索在情感障碍中会增加,但在厌恶性互感状态诱导下会减少。","authors":"Ning Li, Claire A Lavalley, Ko-Ping Chou, Anne E Chuning, Samuel Taylor, Carter M Goldman, Taylor Torres, Rowan Hodson, Robert C Wilson, Jennifer L Stewart, Sahib S Khalsa, Martin P Paulus, Ryan Smith","doi":"10.1101/2024.06.19.24309110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Elevated anxiety and uncertainty avoidance are known to exacerbate maladaptive choice in individuals with affective disorders. However, the differential roles of state vs. trait anxiety remain unclear, and underlying computational mechanisms have not been thoroughly characterized. In the present study, we investigated how a somatic (interoceptive) state anxiety induction influences learning and decision-making under uncertainty in individuals with clinically significant levels of trait anxiety. A sample of 58 healthy comparisons (HCs) and 61 individuals with affective disorders displaying elevated anxiety symptoms (iADs; i.e., anxiety and/or depression) completed a previously validated explore-exploit decision task, with and without an added breathing resistance manipulation designed to induce state anxiety. Computational modeling revealed a significant group-by-condition interaction, such that information-seeking (i.e., directed exploration) in HCs was reduced by the anxiety induction (Cohen's <i>d</i> =.47, <i>p</i> =.013), while no change was observed in iADs. The iADs also showed slower learning rates than HCs across conditions (Cohen's <i>d</i> =.52, <i>p</i> =.003), suggesting more persistent uncertainty. These findings highlight a complex interplay between trait anxiety and state anxiety. Specifically, state anxiety may attenuate reflection on uncertainty in healthy individuals, while familiarity with anxious states in those with high trait anxiety may create an insensitivity to this effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":94281,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11213056/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Directed exploration is reduced by an aversive interoceptive state induction in healthy individuals but not in those with affective disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Ning Li, Claire A Lavalley, Ko-Ping Chou, Anne E Chuning, Samuel Taylor, Carter M Goldman, Taylor Torres, Rowan Hodson, Robert C Wilson, Jennifer L Stewart, Sahib S Khalsa, Martin P Paulus, Ryan Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.06.19.24309110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Elevated anxiety and uncertainty avoidance are known to exacerbate maladaptive choice in individuals with affective disorders. However, the differential roles of state vs. trait anxiety remain unclear, and underlying computational mechanisms have not been thoroughly characterized. In the present study, we investigated how a somatic (interoceptive) state anxiety induction influences learning and decision-making under uncertainty in individuals with clinically significant levels of trait anxiety. A sample of 58 healthy comparisons (HCs) and 61 individuals with affective disorders displaying elevated anxiety symptoms (iADs; i.e., anxiety and/or depression) completed a previously validated explore-exploit decision task, with and without an added breathing resistance manipulation designed to induce state anxiety. Computational modeling revealed a significant group-by-condition interaction, such that information-seeking (i.e., directed exploration) in HCs was reduced by the anxiety induction (Cohen's <i>d</i> =.47, <i>p</i> =.013), while no change was observed in iADs. The iADs also showed slower learning rates than HCs across conditions (Cohen's <i>d</i> =.52, <i>p</i> =.003), suggesting more persistent uncertainty. These findings highlight a complex interplay between trait anxiety and state anxiety. Specifically, state anxiety may attenuate reflection on uncertainty in healthy individuals, while familiarity with anxious states in those with high trait anxiety may create an insensitivity to this effect.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11213056/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.19.24309110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.19.24309110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

众所周知,焦虑和对不确定性的回避会加剧情感障碍患者的不良选择。然而,状态焦虑与特质焦虑的不同作用仍不清楚,其背后的计算机制也没有得到彻底描述。在本研究中,我们调查了躯体(感知)状态焦虑诱导如何影响临床上具有显著特质焦虑水平的个体在不确定情况下的学习和决策。由 58 名健康比较者(HCs)和 61 名情感障碍患者(iADs;即抑郁和/或焦虑)组成的样本完成了之前验证过的 "探索-发现 "决策任务,该任务设计了附加呼吸阻力操作以诱导状态焦虑,但也设计了不附加呼吸阻力操作以诱导状态焦虑。计算模型揭示了这样一种模式:iADs 在静态条件下表现出更强的信息搜寻能力(即定向探索能力;Cohen's d =.39, p =.039),但焦虑诱导降低了这种能力。情感障碍组在不同条件下的学习速度也较慢(Cohen's d =.52,p =.003),这表明不确定性更持久。这些发现凸显了特质焦虑和状态焦虑之间复杂的相互作用。具体来说,虽然特质焦虑的升高与持续的不确定性有关,但急性躯体焦虑会自相矛盾地抑制探索行为,从而可能强化情感障碍的不良决策模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Directed exploration is reduced by an aversive interoceptive state induction in healthy individuals but not in those with affective disorders.

Elevated anxiety and uncertainty avoidance are known to exacerbate maladaptive choice in individuals with affective disorders. However, the differential roles of state vs. trait anxiety remain unclear, and underlying computational mechanisms have not been thoroughly characterized. In the present study, we investigated how a somatic (interoceptive) state anxiety induction influences learning and decision-making under uncertainty in individuals with clinically significant levels of trait anxiety. A sample of 58 healthy comparisons (HCs) and 61 individuals with affective disorders displaying elevated anxiety symptoms (iADs; i.e., anxiety and/or depression) completed a previously validated explore-exploit decision task, with and without an added breathing resistance manipulation designed to induce state anxiety. Computational modeling revealed a significant group-by-condition interaction, such that information-seeking (i.e., directed exploration) in HCs was reduced by the anxiety induction (Cohen's d =.47, p =.013), while no change was observed in iADs. The iADs also showed slower learning rates than HCs across conditions (Cohen's d =.52, p =.003), suggesting more persistent uncertainty. These findings highlight a complex interplay between trait anxiety and state anxiety. Specifically, state anxiety may attenuate reflection on uncertainty in healthy individuals, while familiarity with anxious states in those with high trait anxiety may create an insensitivity to this effect.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信