比较天然产品和母乳对预防和治疗哺乳期妇女乳头创伤和疼痛的效果:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Eyşan Hanzade Savaş , Maide Nur Tümkaya , Remziye Semerci , Kafiye Eroğlu
{"title":"比较天然产品和母乳对预防和治疗哺乳期妇女乳头创伤和疼痛的效果:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Eyşan Hanzade Savaş ,&nbsp;Maide Nur Tümkaya ,&nbsp;Remziye Semerci ,&nbsp;Kafiye Eroğlu","doi":"10.1016/j.explore.2024.103019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Prevention and management of nipple problems are crucial during the postpartum period for effective breastfeeding. Breastmilk is the most commonly recommended method for lactating women. However, insufficient studies have proven its superiority over other methods in the current literature. This study aims to determine the effects of natural products compared to breast milk in preventing and treating nipple trauma and pain in lactating women.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this review, we investigated studies from PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases that met the inclusion criteria. We also assessed the studies' methodological quality with the Cochrane and JBI checklists. This study was performed based on the Guidelines of Systematic Reporting of Examination presented in the PRISMA checklist. The search protocol has been registered at the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews<strong>.</strong></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of ten published studies, including 1139 lactating women, were included in this review. The meta-analysis results showed a significant effect of natural product intervention on nipple trauma (Hedge's g -0.702, <em>Q</em> = 81,154, I<em><sup>2</sup></em> =91,374 %, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), soreness (Hedge's <em>g</em> =-0.648, <em>Q</em> = 7,092, I<em><sup>2</sup></em> =71,801 %, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), and pain levels (Hedge's <em>g</em> =-0.613, <em>Q</em> = 25,058, I<em><sup>2</sup></em> =76,056 %, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) experienced by lactating women.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The findings showed that natural products have greater potential than breast milk in managing nipple pain, trauma, and soreness. However, the evidence for these interventions is low or very low quality. Further research is needed to determine the most effective treatment for nipple trauma in lactating women.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50459,"journal":{"name":"Explore-The Journal of Science and Healing","volume":"20 6","pages":"Article 103019"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the effect of natural products and breast milk for preventing and treating nipple trauma and pain in lactating women: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Eyşan Hanzade Savaş ,&nbsp;Maide Nur Tümkaya ,&nbsp;Remziye Semerci ,&nbsp;Kafiye Eroğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.explore.2024.103019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Prevention and management of nipple problems are crucial during the postpartum period for effective breastfeeding. Breastmilk is the most commonly recommended method for lactating women. However, insufficient studies have proven its superiority over other methods in the current literature. This study aims to determine the effects of natural products compared to breast milk in preventing and treating nipple trauma and pain in lactating women.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this review, we investigated studies from PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases that met the inclusion criteria. We also assessed the studies' methodological quality with the Cochrane and JBI checklists. This study was performed based on the Guidelines of Systematic Reporting of Examination presented in the PRISMA checklist. The search protocol has been registered at the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews<strong>.</strong></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of ten published studies, including 1139 lactating women, were included in this review. The meta-analysis results showed a significant effect of natural product intervention on nipple trauma (Hedge's g -0.702, <em>Q</em> = 81,154, I<em><sup>2</sup></em> =91,374 %, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), soreness (Hedge's <em>g</em> =-0.648, <em>Q</em> = 7,092, I<em><sup>2</sup></em> =71,801 %, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), and pain levels (Hedge's <em>g</em> =-0.613, <em>Q</em> = 25,058, I<em><sup>2</sup></em> =76,056 %, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) experienced by lactating women.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The findings showed that natural products have greater potential than breast milk in managing nipple pain, trauma, and soreness. However, the evidence for these interventions is low or very low quality. Further research is needed to determine the most effective treatment for nipple trauma in lactating women.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Explore-The Journal of Science and Healing\",\"volume\":\"20 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 103019\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Explore-The Journal of Science and Healing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550830724001265\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Explore-The Journal of Science and Healing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550830724001265","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介预防和处理乳头问题是产后有效母乳喂养的关键。母乳喂养是哺乳期妇女最常采用的方法。然而,在目前的文献中,还没有足够的研究证明其优于其他方法。本研究旨在确定与母乳相比,天然产品在预防和治疗哺乳期妇女乳头创伤和疼痛方面的效果:在本综述中,我们调查了 PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、MEDLINE、CINAHL、Scopus 和 Google Scholar 数据库中符合纳入标准的研究。我们还使用 Cochrane 和 JBI 检查表对研究的方法学质量进行了评估。本研究是根据 PRISMA 核对表中的系统性报告指南进行的。检索方案已在 PROSPERO 国际系统性综述前瞻性注册中心注册:本综述共纳入了 10 项已发表的研究,包括 1139 名哺乳期妇女。荟萃分析结果显示,天然产品干预对乳头创伤(Hedge's g -0.702, Q = 81,154, I2 = 91,374 %, p < 0.001)、酸痛(Hedge's g =-0.648, Q = 7,092, I2 = 71,801 %, p < 0.001)和疼痛程度(Hedge's g =-0.613, Q = 25,058, I2 = 76,056 %, p < 0.001):研究结果表明,天然产品在缓解乳头疼痛、创伤和酸痛方面比母乳更有潜力。然而,这些干预措施的证据质量较低或非常低。要确定治疗哺乳期妇女乳头创伤的最有效方法,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the effect of natural products and breast milk for preventing and treating nipple trauma and pain in lactating women: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Prevention and management of nipple problems are crucial during the postpartum period for effective breastfeeding. Breastmilk is the most commonly recommended method for lactating women. However, insufficient studies have proven its superiority over other methods in the current literature. This study aims to determine the effects of natural products compared to breast milk in preventing and treating nipple trauma and pain in lactating women.

Methods

In this review, we investigated studies from PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases that met the inclusion criteria. We also assessed the studies' methodological quality with the Cochrane and JBI checklists. This study was performed based on the Guidelines of Systematic Reporting of Examination presented in the PRISMA checklist. The search protocol has been registered at the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews.

Results

A total of ten published studies, including 1139 lactating women, were included in this review. The meta-analysis results showed a significant effect of natural product intervention on nipple trauma (Hedge's g -0.702, Q = 81,154, I2 =91,374 %, p < 0.001), soreness (Hedge's g =-0.648, Q = 7,092, I2 =71,801 %, p < 0.001), and pain levels (Hedge's g =-0.613, Q = 25,058, I2 =76,056 %, p < 0.001) experienced by lactating women.

Conclusion

The findings showed that natural products have greater potential than breast milk in managing nipple pain, trauma, and soreness. However, the evidence for these interventions is low or very low quality. Further research is needed to determine the most effective treatment for nipple trauma in lactating women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Explore-The Journal of Science and Healing
Explore-The Journal of Science and Healing 医学-全科医学与补充医学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
179
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: EXPLORE: The Journal of Science & Healing addresses the scientific principles behind, and applications of, evidence-based healing practices from a wide variety of sources, including conventional, alternative, and cross-cultural medicine. It is an interdisciplinary journal that explores the healing arts, consciousness, spirituality, eco-environmental issues, and basic science as all these fields relate to health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信