治疗近视性斜视固定的改良西田手术。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
{"title":"治疗近视性斜视固定的改良西田手术。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jaapos.2024.103962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the outcomes of a novel modification of the Nishida procedure with medial rectus recession (Nishida-MRc) for myopic strabismus fixus (MSF) and to compare this modified procedure with the half Jensen’s union with medial rectus recession (U-MRc).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span><span>The medical records of MSF patients who underwent </span>strabismus surgery at a single institution between January 2017 and June 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The main outcome measures assessed were postoperative improvements in ocular alignment and motility. Surgical success was defined as horizontal and vertical deviations ≤15</span><sup>Δ</sup>.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 45 patients were included, of whom 39 had no previous strabismus surgery. All but 3 had follow-up ≥8 months. Nishida-MRc, with or without a traction suture (Ts), had a success rate (9/16 [56%]) higher, though not statistically significantly so, than U-MRc with or without Ts (11/29 [38%]). The Nishida-MRc group tended to have less frequent use of Ts (25% vs 52%; <em>P</em> = 0.076), and 94% of these patients had a deviation within 20<sup>Δ</sup>, compared with 59% for U-MRc (<em>P</em><span> = 0.012). In cases with esotropia of ≥123</span><sup>Δ</sup>, final residual esotropia in the Nishida-MRc without Ts (12.40<sup>Δ</sup> ± 8.30<sup>Δ</sup>) and U-MRc-Ts (19.75<sup>Δ</sup> ± 18.62<sup>Δ</sup>) groups was significantly lower (<em>P</em> = 0.019) than in the U-MRc without Ts group (63.40<sup>Δ</sup> ± 40.83<sup>Δ</sup>), and the average correction of esotropia was significantly greater (<em>P</em> = 0.014).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In our study cohort, Nishida-MRc produced a greater effect in the treatment of MSF than U-MRc.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50261,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aapos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A modified Nishida procedure for management of myopic strabismus fixus\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaapos.2024.103962\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the outcomes of a novel modification of the Nishida procedure with medial rectus recession (Nishida-MRc) for myopic strabismus fixus (MSF) and to compare this modified procedure with the half Jensen’s union with medial rectus recession (U-MRc).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span><span>The medical records of MSF patients who underwent </span>strabismus surgery at a single institution between January 2017 and June 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The main outcome measures assessed were postoperative improvements in ocular alignment and motility. Surgical success was defined as horizontal and vertical deviations ≤15</span><sup>Δ</sup>.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 45 patients were included, of whom 39 had no previous strabismus surgery. All but 3 had follow-up ≥8 months. Nishida-MRc, with or without a traction suture (Ts), had a success rate (9/16 [56%]) higher, though not statistically significantly so, than U-MRc with or without Ts (11/29 [38%]). The Nishida-MRc group tended to have less frequent use of Ts (25% vs 52%; <em>P</em> = 0.076), and 94% of these patients had a deviation within 20<sup>Δ</sup>, compared with 59% for U-MRc (<em>P</em><span> = 0.012). In cases with esotropia of ≥123</span><sup>Δ</sup>, final residual esotropia in the Nishida-MRc without Ts (12.40<sup>Δ</sup> ± 8.30<sup>Δ</sup>) and U-MRc-Ts (19.75<sup>Δ</sup> ± 18.62<sup>Δ</sup>) groups was significantly lower (<em>P</em> = 0.019) than in the U-MRc without Ts group (63.40<sup>Δ</sup> ± 40.83<sup>Δ</sup>), and the average correction of esotropia was significantly greater (<em>P</em> = 0.014).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In our study cohort, Nishida-MRc produced a greater effect in the treatment of MSF than U-MRc.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aapos\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aapos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1091853124002428\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aapos","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1091853124002428","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估近视斜视固定术(MSF)西田内侧直肌后退术(Nishida-MRc)的新型改良术式的疗效,并将该改良术式与半詹森联合内侧直肌后退术(U-MRc)进行比较:回顾性审查了2017年1月至2022年6月期间在一家机构接受斜视手术的MSF患者的病历。评估的主要结果指标是术后眼球排列和运动的改善情况。手术成功定义为水平和垂直偏差≤15Δ:结果:共纳入 45 名患者,其中 39 人之前未接受过斜视手术。除 3 名患者外,其余患者的随访时间均≥8 个月。无论是否使用牵引缝合线(Ts),西田-MRc 的成功率(9/16 [56%])均高于使用或不使用 Ts 的 U-MRc(11/29 [38%]),但在统计学上并无显著差异。Nishida-MRc 组使用 Ts 的频率较低(25% 对 52%;P = 0.076),94% 的患者偏差在 20Δ 以内,而 U-MRc 组为 59%(P = 0.012)。在内斜≥123Δ的病例中,无Ts的西田-MRc组(12.40Δ ± 8.30Δ)和U-MRc-Ts组(19.75Δ ± 18.62Δ)的最终残余内斜明显低于U-MRc组(P = 0.019)明显低于不含Ts的U-MRc组(63.40Δ ± 40.83Δ),且内斜视的平均矫正率明显高于不含Ts的U-MRc组(P = 0.014):结论:在我们的研究队列中,西田磁共振成像在治疗 MSF 方面比 U-MRc 更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A modified Nishida procedure for management of myopic strabismus fixus

Purpose

To evaluate the outcomes of a novel modification of the Nishida procedure with medial rectus recession (Nishida-MRc) for myopic strabismus fixus (MSF) and to compare this modified procedure with the half Jensen’s union with medial rectus recession (U-MRc).

Methods

The medical records of MSF patients who underwent strabismus surgery at a single institution between January 2017 and June 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The main outcome measures assessed were postoperative improvements in ocular alignment and motility. Surgical success was defined as horizontal and vertical deviations ≤15Δ.

Results

A total of 45 patients were included, of whom 39 had no previous strabismus surgery. All but 3 had follow-up ≥8 months. Nishida-MRc, with or without a traction suture (Ts), had a success rate (9/16 [56%]) higher, though not statistically significantly so, than U-MRc with or without Ts (11/29 [38%]). The Nishida-MRc group tended to have less frequent use of Ts (25% vs 52%; P = 0.076), and 94% of these patients had a deviation within 20Δ, compared with 59% for U-MRc (P = 0.012). In cases with esotropia of ≥123Δ, final residual esotropia in the Nishida-MRc without Ts (12.40Δ ± 8.30Δ) and U-MRc-Ts (19.75Δ ± 18.62Δ) groups was significantly lower (P = 0.019) than in the U-MRc without Ts group (63.40Δ ± 40.83Δ), and the average correction of esotropia was significantly greater (P = 0.014).

Conclusions

In our study cohort, Nishida-MRc produced a greater effect in the treatment of MSF than U-MRc.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Aapos
Journal of Aapos 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
159
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Journal of AAPOS presents expert information on children''s eye diseases and on strabismus as it affects all age groups. Major articles by leading experts in the field cover clinical and investigative studies, treatments, case reports, surgical techniques, descriptions of instrumentation, current concept reviews, and new diagnostic techniques. The Journal is the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信