RPLP0/TBP是人牙髓干细胞成骨分化过程中最稳定的参考基因。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q3 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Daniel B Ferreira, Leticia M Gasparoni, Cristiane F Bronzeri, Katiucia B S Paiva
{"title":"RPLP0/TBP是人牙髓干细胞成骨分化过程中最稳定的参考基因。","authors":"Daniel B Ferreira, Leticia M Gasparoni, Cristiane F Bronzeri, Katiucia B S Paiva","doi":"10.4252/wjsc.v16.i6.656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Validation of the reference gene (RG) stability during experimental analyses is essential for correct quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) data normalisation. Commonly, in an unreliable way, several studies use genes involved in essential cellular functions [glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), 18S rRNA, and β-actin] without paying attention to whether they are suitable for such experimental conditions or the reason for choosing such genes. Furthermore, such studies use only one gene when Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments guidelines recommend two or more genes. It impacts the credibility of these studies and causes distortions in the gene expression findings. For tissue engineering, the accuracy of gene expression drives the best experimental or therapeutical approaches.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To verify the most stable RG during osteogenic differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) by RT-qPCR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We cultivated DPSCs under two conditions: Undifferentiated and osteogenic differentiation, both for 35 d. We evaluated the gene expression of 10 candidates for RGs [ribosomal protein, large, P0 (<i>RPLP0</i>), TATA-binding protein (<i>TBP</i>), <i>GAPDH</i>, actin beta (<i>ACTB</i>), tubulin (<i>TUB</i>), aminolevulinic acid synthase 1 (<i>ALAS1</i>), tyrosine 3-monooxygenase/tryptophan 5-monooxygenase activation protein, zeta (<i>YWHAZ</i>), eukaryotic translational elongation factor 1 alpha (<i>EF1a</i>), succinate dehydrogenase complex, subunit A, flavoprotein (<i>SDHA</i>), and beta-2-microglobulin (<i>B2M</i>)] every 7 d (1, 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 d) by RT-qPCR. The data were analysed by the four main algorithms, ΔCt method, geNorm, NormFinder, and BestKeeper and ranked by the RefFinder method. We subdivided the samples into eight subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All of the data sets from clonogenic and osteogenic samples were analysed using the RefFinder algorithm. The final ranking showed RPLP0/TBP as the two most stable RGs and TUB/B2M as the two least stable RGs. Either the ΔCt method or NormFinder analysis showed TBP/RPLP0 as the two most stable genes. However, geNorm analysis showed RPLP0/EF1α in the first place. These algorithms' two least stable RGs were B2M/GAPDH. For BestKeeper, ALAS1 was ranked as the most stable RG, and SDHA as the least stable RG. The pair RPLP0/TBP was detected in most subgroups as the most stable RGs, following the RefFinfer ranking.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For the first time, we show that RPLP0/TBP are the most stable RGs, whereas TUB/B2M are unstable RGs for long-term osteogenic differentiation of human DPSCs in traditional monolayers.</p>","PeriodicalId":23775,"journal":{"name":"World journal of stem cells","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11212553/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RPLP0/TBP are the most stable reference genes for human dental pulp stem cells under osteogenic differentiation.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel B Ferreira, Leticia M Gasparoni, Cristiane F Bronzeri, Katiucia B S Paiva\",\"doi\":\"10.4252/wjsc.v16.i6.656\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Validation of the reference gene (RG) stability during experimental analyses is essential for correct quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) data normalisation. Commonly, in an unreliable way, several studies use genes involved in essential cellular functions [glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), 18S rRNA, and β-actin] without paying attention to whether they are suitable for such experimental conditions or the reason for choosing such genes. Furthermore, such studies use only one gene when Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments guidelines recommend two or more genes. It impacts the credibility of these studies and causes distortions in the gene expression findings. For tissue engineering, the accuracy of gene expression drives the best experimental or therapeutical approaches.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To verify the most stable RG during osteogenic differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) by RT-qPCR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We cultivated DPSCs under two conditions: Undifferentiated and osteogenic differentiation, both for 35 d. We evaluated the gene expression of 10 candidates for RGs [ribosomal protein, large, P0 (<i>RPLP0</i>), TATA-binding protein (<i>TBP</i>), <i>GAPDH</i>, actin beta (<i>ACTB</i>), tubulin (<i>TUB</i>), aminolevulinic acid synthase 1 (<i>ALAS1</i>), tyrosine 3-monooxygenase/tryptophan 5-monooxygenase activation protein, zeta (<i>YWHAZ</i>), eukaryotic translational elongation factor 1 alpha (<i>EF1a</i>), succinate dehydrogenase complex, subunit A, flavoprotein (<i>SDHA</i>), and beta-2-microglobulin (<i>B2M</i>)] every 7 d (1, 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 d) by RT-qPCR. The data were analysed by the four main algorithms, ΔCt method, geNorm, NormFinder, and BestKeeper and ranked by the RefFinder method. We subdivided the samples into eight subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All of the data sets from clonogenic and osteogenic samples were analysed using the RefFinder algorithm. The final ranking showed RPLP0/TBP as the two most stable RGs and TUB/B2M as the two least stable RGs. Either the ΔCt method or NormFinder analysis showed TBP/RPLP0 as the two most stable genes. However, geNorm analysis showed RPLP0/EF1α in the first place. These algorithms' two least stable RGs were B2M/GAPDH. For BestKeeper, ALAS1 was ranked as the most stable RG, and SDHA as the least stable RG. The pair RPLP0/TBP was detected in most subgroups as the most stable RGs, following the RefFinfer ranking.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For the first time, we show that RPLP0/TBP are the most stable RGs, whereas TUB/B2M are unstable RGs for long-term osteogenic differentiation of human DPSCs in traditional monolayers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23775,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World journal of stem cells\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11212553/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World journal of stem cells\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v16.i6.656\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of stem cells","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v16.i6.656","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在实验分析过程中验证参考基因(RG)的稳定性对于正确的实时定量聚合酶链反应(RT-qPCR)数据归一化至关重要。一些研究通常以不可靠的方式使用涉及细胞基本功能的基因[甘油醛-3-磷酸脱氢酶(GAPDH)、18S rRNA 和 β-肌动蛋白],而不注意这些基因是否适合此类实验条件或选择此类基因的原因。此外,这些研究只使用了一种基因,而《定量 Real-Time PCR 实验发表的最低限度信息》指南建议使用两种或两种以上的基因。这影响了这些研究的可信度,并导致基因表达结果失真。对于组织工程学而言,基因表达的准确性是最佳实验或治疗方法的驱动力。目的:通过 RT-qPCR 验证人牙髓干细胞(DPSCs)成骨分化过程中最稳定的 RG:方法:我们在两种条件下培养牙髓干细胞:方法:我们在两种条件下培养牙髓干细胞:未分化和成骨分化,培养时间均为35 d。我们评估了 10 种候选 RGs(核糖体蛋白,大,P0 (RPLP0)、TATA 结合蛋白 (TBP)、GAPDH、肌动蛋白 beta (ACTB)、微管蛋白 (TUB)、氨基乙酰丙酸合成酶 1 (ALAS1)、酪氨酸 3-单加氧酶/色氨酸 5-单加氧酶活化蛋白、zeta(YWHAZ)、真核翻译伸长因子 1 alpha(EF1a)、琥珀酸脱氢酶复合物亚基 A、黄素蛋白(SDHA)和 beta-2-微球蛋白(B2M)],每 7 天(1、7、14、21、28 和 35 天)通过 RT-qPCR 检测一次。数据采用四种主要算法(ΔCt 法、geNorm 法、NormFinder 法和 BestKeeper 法)进行分析,并采用 RefFinder 法进行排序。我们将样本细分为八个子组:结果:使用 RefFinder 算法分析了克隆和成骨样本的所有数据集。最终排名显示,RPLP0/TBP 是两个最稳定的 RG,TUB/B2M 是两个最不稳定的 RG。ΔCt方法或NormFinder分析都显示TBP/RPLP0是两个最稳定的基因。然而,geNorm 分析显示 RPLP0/EF1α 排在首位。这些算法中最不稳定的两个 RG 是 B2M/GAPDH。在 BestKeeper 中,ALAS1 被评为最稳定的 RG,SDHA 被评为最不稳定的 RG。在大多数分组中,RPLP0/TBP 对被检测为最稳定的 RG,这与 RefFinfer 的排名一致:结论:我们首次发现 RPLP0/TBP 是最稳定的 RG,而 TUB/B2M 是不稳定的 RG,可用于人类 DPSCs 在传统单层中的长期成骨分化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
RPLP0/TBP are the most stable reference genes for human dental pulp stem cells under osteogenic differentiation.

Background: Validation of the reference gene (RG) stability during experimental analyses is essential for correct quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) data normalisation. Commonly, in an unreliable way, several studies use genes involved in essential cellular functions [glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), 18S rRNA, and β-actin] without paying attention to whether they are suitable for such experimental conditions or the reason for choosing such genes. Furthermore, such studies use only one gene when Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments guidelines recommend two or more genes. It impacts the credibility of these studies and causes distortions in the gene expression findings. For tissue engineering, the accuracy of gene expression drives the best experimental or therapeutical approaches.

Aim: To verify the most stable RG during osteogenic differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) by RT-qPCR.

Methods: We cultivated DPSCs under two conditions: Undifferentiated and osteogenic differentiation, both for 35 d. We evaluated the gene expression of 10 candidates for RGs [ribosomal protein, large, P0 (RPLP0), TATA-binding protein (TBP), GAPDH, actin beta (ACTB), tubulin (TUB), aminolevulinic acid synthase 1 (ALAS1), tyrosine 3-monooxygenase/tryptophan 5-monooxygenase activation protein, zeta (YWHAZ), eukaryotic translational elongation factor 1 alpha (EF1a), succinate dehydrogenase complex, subunit A, flavoprotein (SDHA), and beta-2-microglobulin (B2M)] every 7 d (1, 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 d) by RT-qPCR. The data were analysed by the four main algorithms, ΔCt method, geNorm, NormFinder, and BestKeeper and ranked by the RefFinder method. We subdivided the samples into eight subgroups.

Results: All of the data sets from clonogenic and osteogenic samples were analysed using the RefFinder algorithm. The final ranking showed RPLP0/TBP as the two most stable RGs and TUB/B2M as the two least stable RGs. Either the ΔCt method or NormFinder analysis showed TBP/RPLP0 as the two most stable genes. However, geNorm analysis showed RPLP0/EF1α in the first place. These algorithms' two least stable RGs were B2M/GAPDH. For BestKeeper, ALAS1 was ranked as the most stable RG, and SDHA as the least stable RG. The pair RPLP0/TBP was detected in most subgroups as the most stable RGs, following the RefFinfer ranking.

Conclusion: For the first time, we show that RPLP0/TBP are the most stable RGs, whereas TUB/B2M are unstable RGs for long-term osteogenic differentiation of human DPSCs in traditional monolayers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World journal of stem cells
World journal of stem cells Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Biology
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
750
期刊介绍: The World Journal of Stem Cells (WJSC) is a leading academic journal devoted to reporting the latest, cutting-edge research progress and findings of basic research and clinical practice in the field of stem cells. It was launched on December 31, 2009 and is published monthly (12 issues annually) by BPG, the world''s leading professional clinical medical journal publishing company.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信