经皮椎体成形术后邻近椎体骨折保守治疗失败的风险因素。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005085
Po-Hao Huang, Chih-Wei Chen, Ming-Hsiao Hu, Shu-Hua Yang, Chuan-Ching Huang
{"title":"经皮椎体成形术后邻近椎体骨折保守治疗失败的风险因素。","authors":"Po-Hao Huang, Chih-Wei Chen, Ming-Hsiao Hu, Shu-Hua Yang, Chuan-Ching Huang","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective, single-center, observational study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated the risk factors associated with the failure of conservative treatment for adjacent vertebral fractures (AVFs).</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Adjacent vertebral fractures following vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures are not uncommon. Presently, there is a lack of consensus regarding the management of adjacent vertebral fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients who developed adjacent vertebral fractures within 2 years post single-level vertebroplasty between January 2013 and December 2020. All patients initially underwent 6 weeks of conservative treatment, including pain medications, bracing, and physical therapy. Surgical intervention was offered to those with intractable back pain due to AVFs. Baseline demographics, AVF characteristics, and radiologic measurements were systematically collected, and sequential univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to explore the risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 114 patients with a mean age of 78.6 years, 2-thirds (76 patients) tolerated conservative treatment well, whereas 38 required surgical interventions for adjacent vertebral fractures. Both groups demonstrated similar baseline demographics and radiologic parameters regarding AVFs ( P >0.05). The multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed that the development of AVFs later than 6 months post-vertebroplasty and their caudal location to the index vertebroplasty were the independent risk factors of unsuccessful conservative treatment, with odds ratios of 3.57 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14-11.1, P =0.029) and 2.50 (95% CI, 1.09-5.88, P =0.032), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adjacent vertebral fractures following percutaneous vertebroplasty generally have favorable outcomes under conservative treatment. However, the timing and the relative anatomical location of adjacent vertebral fractures are associated with treatment efficacy. Adjacent vertebral fractures occurring later than 6 months following the initial vertebroplasty or situated in the caudal location to the index vertebroplasty may exhibit reduced responsiveness to conservative treatment. These patients might benefit from a more aggressive therapeutic approach.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>3.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":"339-346"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Factors of Failed Conservative Treatment for Adjacent Vertebral Fractures Following Percutaneous Vertebroplasty.\",\"authors\":\"Po-Hao Huang, Chih-Wei Chen, Ming-Hsiao Hu, Shu-Hua Yang, Chuan-Ching Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective, single-center, observational study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated the risk factors associated with the failure of conservative treatment for adjacent vertebral fractures (AVFs).</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Adjacent vertebral fractures following vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures are not uncommon. Presently, there is a lack of consensus regarding the management of adjacent vertebral fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients who developed adjacent vertebral fractures within 2 years post single-level vertebroplasty between January 2013 and December 2020. All patients initially underwent 6 weeks of conservative treatment, including pain medications, bracing, and physical therapy. Surgical intervention was offered to those with intractable back pain due to AVFs. Baseline demographics, AVF characteristics, and radiologic measurements were systematically collected, and sequential univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to explore the risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 114 patients with a mean age of 78.6 years, 2-thirds (76 patients) tolerated conservative treatment well, whereas 38 required surgical interventions for adjacent vertebral fractures. Both groups demonstrated similar baseline demographics and radiologic parameters regarding AVFs ( P >0.05). The multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed that the development of AVFs later than 6 months post-vertebroplasty and their caudal location to the index vertebroplasty were the independent risk factors of unsuccessful conservative treatment, with odds ratios of 3.57 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14-11.1, P =0.029) and 2.50 (95% CI, 1.09-5.88, P =0.032), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adjacent vertebral fractures following percutaneous vertebroplasty generally have favorable outcomes under conservative treatment. However, the timing and the relative anatomical location of adjacent vertebral fractures are associated with treatment efficacy. Adjacent vertebral fractures occurring later than 6 months following the initial vertebroplasty or situated in the caudal location to the index vertebroplasty may exhibit reduced responsiveness to conservative treatment. These patients might benefit from a more aggressive therapeutic approach.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>3.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"339-346\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005085\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005085","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计回顾性、单中心、观察性研究:本研究调查了与邻近椎体骨折(AVF)保守治疗失败相关的风险因素:椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折后发生邻近椎体骨折的情况并不少见。目前,对于邻近椎体骨折的处理还缺乏共识:我们纳入了 2013 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月间单水平椎体成形术后两年内发生邻近椎体骨折的患者。所有患者最初都接受了为期六周的保守治疗,包括止痛药物、支具和理疗。手术治疗适用于因反向房颤导致的顽固性背痛患者。研究人员系统收集了基线人口统计学数据、动静脉畸形特征和放射学测量数据,并进行了连续的单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析,以探究风险因素:在平均年龄为78.6岁的114名患者中,三分之二(76名)的患者能很好地耐受保守治疗,38名患者因邻近椎体骨折而需要手术治疗。两组患者的基线人口统计学和有关 AVF 的放射学参数相似(P>0.05)。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,椎体成形术后6个月后出现AVFs以及AVFs位于椎体成形术的尾部是保守治疗失败的独立风险因素,其几率分别为3.57(95% 置信区间[CI]:1.14-11.1,P=0.029)和2.50(95% CI:1.09-5.88,P=0.032):结论:经皮椎体成形术后的相邻椎体骨折在保守治疗下一般都有良好的预后。结论:经皮椎体成形术后的相邻椎体骨折在保守治疗下一般会有良好的疗效,但相邻椎体骨折发生的时间和相对解剖位置与治疗效果有关。在初次椎体成形术后六个月以后发生的邻近椎体骨折,或位于初次椎体成形术后尾部位置的邻近椎体骨折,可能对保守治疗的反应性降低。这些患者可能会从更积极的治疗方法中获益:3.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk Factors of Failed Conservative Treatment for Adjacent Vertebral Fractures Following Percutaneous Vertebroplasty.

Study design: A retrospective, single-center, observational study.

Objective: This study investigated the risk factors associated with the failure of conservative treatment for adjacent vertebral fractures (AVFs).

Summary of background data: Adjacent vertebral fractures following vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures are not uncommon. Presently, there is a lack of consensus regarding the management of adjacent vertebral fractures.

Methods: We included patients who developed adjacent vertebral fractures within 2 years post single-level vertebroplasty between January 2013 and December 2020. All patients initially underwent 6 weeks of conservative treatment, including pain medications, bracing, and physical therapy. Surgical intervention was offered to those with intractable back pain due to AVFs. Baseline demographics, AVF characteristics, and radiologic measurements were systematically collected, and sequential univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to explore the risk factors.

Results: Of the 114 patients with a mean age of 78.6 years, 2-thirds (76 patients) tolerated conservative treatment well, whereas 38 required surgical interventions for adjacent vertebral fractures. Both groups demonstrated similar baseline demographics and radiologic parameters regarding AVFs ( P >0.05). The multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed that the development of AVFs later than 6 months post-vertebroplasty and their caudal location to the index vertebroplasty were the independent risk factors of unsuccessful conservative treatment, with odds ratios of 3.57 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14-11.1, P =0.029) and 2.50 (95% CI, 1.09-5.88, P =0.032), respectively.

Conclusion: Adjacent vertebral fractures following percutaneous vertebroplasty generally have favorable outcomes under conservative treatment. However, the timing and the relative anatomical location of adjacent vertebral fractures are associated with treatment efficacy. Adjacent vertebral fractures occurring later than 6 months following the initial vertebroplasty or situated in the caudal location to the index vertebroplasty may exhibit reduced responsiveness to conservative treatment. These patients might benefit from a more aggressive therapeutic approach.

Level of evidence: 3.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信