新生儿足跟刺穿自动穿刺器的镇痛效用:系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 1.4 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Pain management Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1080/17581869.2024.2368451
Rajendra Prasad Anne, Emine A Rahiman
{"title":"新生儿足跟刺穿自动穿刺器的镇痛效用:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Rajendra Prasad Anne, Emine A Rahiman","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2024.2368451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the benefits of an automatic lancing device compared with a manual lancet or a hypodermic needle in neonates.<b>Materials & methods:</b> We followed the Cochrane Handbook methodology, used the RoB-2 tool for risk of bias assessment, RevMan 4.1 for meta-analysis and GRADE framework for certainty assessment. We searched the databases and gray literature on 15 November 2023.<b>Results:</b> Six eligible studies enrolling 539 neonates were included. An automatic lancing device reduced pain scores during and after heel prick, sampling time and the need for repeat puncture. The certainty of evidence was very low to moderate.<b>Conclusion:</b> An automatic lancing device is preferred for heel pricks in neonates, given less pain and higher efficiency.<b>PROSPERO registration number:</b> CRD42023483189.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11485952/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analgesic utility of automatic lancing device for heel prick in neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Rajendra Prasad Anne, Emine A Rahiman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17581869.2024.2368451\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the benefits of an automatic lancing device compared with a manual lancet or a hypodermic needle in neonates.<b>Materials & methods:</b> We followed the Cochrane Handbook methodology, used the RoB-2 tool for risk of bias assessment, RevMan 4.1 for meta-analysis and GRADE framework for certainty assessment. We searched the databases and gray literature on 15 November 2023.<b>Results:</b> Six eligible studies enrolling 539 neonates were included. An automatic lancing device reduced pain scores during and after heel prick, sampling time and the need for repeat puncture. The certainty of evidence was very low to moderate.<b>Conclusion:</b> An automatic lancing device is preferred for heel pricks in neonates, given less pain and higher efficiency.<b>PROSPERO registration number:</b> CRD42023483189.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11485952/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2024.2368451\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2024.2368451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了自动结扎装置与手动柳叶刀或皮下注射针相比对新生儿的益处。材料与方法:我们遵循 Cochrane 手册的方法,使用 RoB-2 工具进行偏倚风险评估,使用 RevMan 4.1 进行荟萃分析,并使用 GRADE 框架进行确定性评估。我们于 2023 年 11 月 15 日检索了数据库和灰色文献。结果:共纳入了六项符合条件的研究,其中包括 539 名新生儿。自动静脉穿刺装置降低了足跟穿刺时和穿刺后的疼痛评分、取样时间和重复穿刺的需要。证据的确定性从很低到中等。结论在新生儿足跟穿刺时,自动静脉穿刺器是首选,因为它能减轻疼痛并提高效率:CRD42023483189。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analgesic utility of automatic lancing device for heel prick in neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the benefits of an automatic lancing device compared with a manual lancet or a hypodermic needle in neonates.Materials & methods: We followed the Cochrane Handbook methodology, used the RoB-2 tool for risk of bias assessment, RevMan 4.1 for meta-analysis and GRADE framework for certainty assessment. We searched the databases and gray literature on 15 November 2023.Results: Six eligible studies enrolling 539 neonates were included. An automatic lancing device reduced pain scores during and after heel prick, sampling time and the need for repeat puncture. The certainty of evidence was very low to moderate.Conclusion: An automatic lancing device is preferred for heel pricks in neonates, given less pain and higher efficiency.PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023483189.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain management
Pain management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信