评估膳食可持续性的多重标准措施:系统综述。

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Mariana Rei, Alexandra Costa, Sofia Sosa, Sofia da Costa, Duarte Torres, Colin Sage, Sara Rodrigues
{"title":"评估膳食可持续性的多重标准措施:系统综述。","authors":"Mariana Rei, Alexandra Costa, Sofia Sosa, Sofia da Costa, Duarte Torres, Colin Sage, Sara Rodrigues","doi":"10.1093/nutrit/nuae081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Assessing the overall sustainability of a diet is a challenging undertaking requiring a holistic approach capable of addressing the multicriteria nature of this concept.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to identify and summarize the multicriteria measures used to assess the sustainability characteristics of diets reported at the individual level by healthy adults.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Articles were identified via PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The search strategy consisted of key words and MeSH terms, and was concluded in September 2022, covering references in English, Spanish, and Portuguese.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines. The search identified 5663 references, from which 1794 were duplicates. Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts of each of the 3869 records and the full-text of the 144 references selected. Of these, 7 studies met the inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>A total of 6 multicriteria measures were identified: 3 different Sustainable Diet Indices, the Quality Environmental Costs of Diet, the Quality Financial Costs of Diet, and the Environmental Impact of Diet. All of these incorporated a health/nutrition dimension, while the environmental and economic dimensions were the second and the third most integrated, respectively. A sociocultural sustainability dimension was included in only 1 of the measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite some methodological concerns in the development and validation process of the identified measures, their inclusion is considered indispensable in assessing the transition towards sustainable diets in future studies.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration no. CRD42022358824.</p>","PeriodicalId":19469,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multicriteria Measures to Assess the Sustainability of Diets: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Mariana Rei, Alexandra Costa, Sofia Sosa, Sofia da Costa, Duarte Torres, Colin Sage, Sara Rodrigues\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/nutrit/nuae081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Assessing the overall sustainability of a diet is a challenging undertaking requiring a holistic approach capable of addressing the multicriteria nature of this concept.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to identify and summarize the multicriteria measures used to assess the sustainability characteristics of diets reported at the individual level by healthy adults.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Articles were identified via PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The search strategy consisted of key words and MeSH terms, and was concluded in September 2022, covering references in English, Spanish, and Portuguese.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines. The search identified 5663 references, from which 1794 were duplicates. Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts of each of the 3869 records and the full-text of the 144 references selected. Of these, 7 studies met the inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>A total of 6 multicriteria measures were identified: 3 different Sustainable Diet Indices, the Quality Environmental Costs of Diet, the Quality Financial Costs of Diet, and the Environmental Impact of Diet. All of these incorporated a health/nutrition dimension, while the environmental and economic dimensions were the second and the third most integrated, respectively. A sociocultural sustainability dimension was included in only 1 of the measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite some methodological concerns in the development and validation process of the identified measures, their inclusion is considered indispensable in assessing the transition towards sustainable diets in future studies.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration no. CRD42022358824.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuae081\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuae081","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:评估膳食的整体可持续性是一项具有挑战性的工作,需要一种能够解决这一概念的多标准性质的整体方法:数据来源:通过 PubMed、Scopus 和 Web 查找文章:数据来源:通过 PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 查找文章。搜索策略包括关键词和 MeSH 术语,搜索于 2022 年 9 月结束,涵盖英语、西班牙语和葡萄牙语的参考文献:本系统性综述遵循 PRISMA 指南。检索共发现 5663 篇参考文献,其中 1794 篇为重复。两名审稿人分别独立筛选了 3869 条记录的标题和摘要,以及所选 144 篇参考文献的全文。其中,7 项研究符合纳入标准:数据分析:共确定了 6 项多重标准衡量方法:数据分析:共确定了 6 项多标准衡量方法:3 种不同的可持续膳食指数、膳食的质量环境成本、膳食的质量财务成本和膳食的环境影响。所有这些都包含了健康/营养维度,而环境和经济维度分别是第二和第三大综合维度。只有一项措施包含了社会文化可持续性维度:尽管在制定和验证所确定的衡量标准的过程中存在一些方法上的问题,但在未来的研究中,纳入这些衡量标准对于评估向可持续膳食的过渡是不可或缺的:系统综述注册:PROSPERO 注册号CRD42022358824。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multicriteria Measures to Assess the Sustainability of Diets: A Systematic Review.

Context: Assessing the overall sustainability of a diet is a challenging undertaking requiring a holistic approach capable of addressing the multicriteria nature of this concept.

Objective: The aim was to identify and summarize the multicriteria measures used to assess the sustainability characteristics of diets reported at the individual level by healthy adults.

Data sources: Articles were identified via PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The search strategy consisted of key words and MeSH terms, and was concluded in September 2022, covering references in English, Spanish, and Portuguese.

Data extraction: This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines. The search identified 5663 references, from which 1794 were duplicates. Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts of each of the 3869 records and the full-text of the 144 references selected. Of these, 7 studies met the inclusion criteria.

Data analysis: A total of 6 multicriteria measures were identified: 3 different Sustainable Diet Indices, the Quality Environmental Costs of Diet, the Quality Financial Costs of Diet, and the Environmental Impact of Diet. All of these incorporated a health/nutrition dimension, while the environmental and economic dimensions were the second and the third most integrated, respectively. A sociocultural sustainability dimension was included in only 1 of the measures.

Conclusion: Despite some methodological concerns in the development and validation process of the identified measures, their inclusion is considered indispensable in assessing the transition towards sustainable diets in future studies.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42022358824.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition reviews
Nutrition reviews 医学-营养学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition Reviews is a highly cited, monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that specializes in the publication of authoritative and critical literature reviews on current and emerging topics in nutrition science, food science, clinical nutrition, and nutrition policy. Readers of Nutrition Reviews include nutrition scientists, biomedical researchers, clinical and dietetic practitioners, and advanced students of nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信