{"title":"都灵(意大利西北部)乳腺癌筛查参与度和结果的环境和个体不平等。","authors":"Chiara Di Girolamo, Giulio Cammarata, Livia Giordano, Nicolás Zengarini, Elisa Ferracin, Viviana Vergini, Gianluigi Ferrante, Fulvio Ricceri","doi":"10.1038/s41523-024-00660-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Breast cancer incidence and screening participation exhibit an unequal distribution in the population. This study aims to investigate the impact of socioeconomic position (SEP) on three breast screening indicators (participation, recall, and cancer detection rates) among women aged 50-69 in the city of Turin between 2010 and 2019. The study also aims to determine whether contextual factors (deprivation index) or individual factors (educational level) have a greater influence. The data used in this study are sourced from the Turin Breast Screening Program (TBSP) and the Turin Longitudinal Study (TLS). To test the hypothesis and account for the hierarchical structure of the data, multilevel models were used. Both contextual and individual SEP were found to be associated with screening participation. Participation increased with higher levels of deprivation (odds ratio for most deprived: 1.13; 95% CI 1.11-1.16) and decreased with higher educational levels (OR for low educated: 1.37; 95% CI 1.34-1.40). Contextual SEP did not show any association with recall or cancer detection rates, but individual SEP had an impact. Women with lower educational levels had a statistically significant 19% lower odds of being recalled and a statistically significant 20% lower odds of being diagnosed with cancer. Additionally, immigrant women were less likely to participate in screening, be recalled, or receive a cancer diagnosis. Educational level consistently influenced the analyzed screening indicators, while contextual deprivation appeared to have less importance. It is likely that women living in less deprived areas and with higher education have greater access to opportunistic screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":19247,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Breast Cancer","volume":"10 1","pages":"51"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11211318/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contextual and individual inequalities in breast cancer screening participation and outcomes in Turin (North-West Italy).\",\"authors\":\"Chiara Di Girolamo, Giulio Cammarata, Livia Giordano, Nicolás Zengarini, Elisa Ferracin, Viviana Vergini, Gianluigi Ferrante, Fulvio Ricceri\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41523-024-00660-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Breast cancer incidence and screening participation exhibit an unequal distribution in the population. This study aims to investigate the impact of socioeconomic position (SEP) on three breast screening indicators (participation, recall, and cancer detection rates) among women aged 50-69 in the city of Turin between 2010 and 2019. The study also aims to determine whether contextual factors (deprivation index) or individual factors (educational level) have a greater influence. The data used in this study are sourced from the Turin Breast Screening Program (TBSP) and the Turin Longitudinal Study (TLS). To test the hypothesis and account for the hierarchical structure of the data, multilevel models were used. Both contextual and individual SEP were found to be associated with screening participation. Participation increased with higher levels of deprivation (odds ratio for most deprived: 1.13; 95% CI 1.11-1.16) and decreased with higher educational levels (OR for low educated: 1.37; 95% CI 1.34-1.40). Contextual SEP did not show any association with recall or cancer detection rates, but individual SEP had an impact. Women with lower educational levels had a statistically significant 19% lower odds of being recalled and a statistically significant 20% lower odds of being diagnosed with cancer. Additionally, immigrant women were less likely to participate in screening, be recalled, or receive a cancer diagnosis. Educational level consistently influenced the analyzed screening indicators, while contextual deprivation appeared to have less importance. It is likely that women living in less deprived areas and with higher education have greater access to opportunistic screening.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Breast Cancer\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11211318/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Breast Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-024-00660-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Breast Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-024-00660-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
乳腺癌发病率和筛查参与率在人群中的分布不均。本研究旨在调查 2010 年至 2019 年间社会经济地位(SEP)对都灵市 50-69 岁女性的三项乳腺癌筛查指标(参与率、召回率和癌症检出率)的影响。研究还旨在确定是环境因素(贫困指数)还是个人因素(教育水平)的影响更大。本研究使用的数据来自都灵乳腺筛查计划(TBSP)和都灵纵向研究(TLS)。为了验证假设并考虑数据的层次结构,研究采用了多层次模型。研究发现,环境和个人 SEP 都与筛查参与度有关。贫困程度越高,筛查参与率越高(最贫困者的几率比:1.13;95% CI 1.11-1.16),而教育程度越高,参与率越低(教育程度低者的几率比:1.37;95% CI 1.34-1.40)。环境 SEP 与召回率或癌症检出率没有任何关联,但个人 SEP 会产生影响。教育水平较低的妇女被召回的几率在统计学上显著降低了 19%,被诊断为癌症的几率在统计学上显著降低了 20%。此外,移民妇女参与筛查、被召回或接受癌症诊断的可能性较低。教育水平一直影响着所分析的筛查指标,而环境贫困似乎不太重要。生活在贫困程度较低地区和受过高等教育的妇女可能更容易获得机会性筛查。
Contextual and individual inequalities in breast cancer screening participation and outcomes in Turin (North-West Italy).
Breast cancer incidence and screening participation exhibit an unequal distribution in the population. This study aims to investigate the impact of socioeconomic position (SEP) on three breast screening indicators (participation, recall, and cancer detection rates) among women aged 50-69 in the city of Turin between 2010 and 2019. The study also aims to determine whether contextual factors (deprivation index) or individual factors (educational level) have a greater influence. The data used in this study are sourced from the Turin Breast Screening Program (TBSP) and the Turin Longitudinal Study (TLS). To test the hypothesis and account for the hierarchical structure of the data, multilevel models were used. Both contextual and individual SEP were found to be associated with screening participation. Participation increased with higher levels of deprivation (odds ratio for most deprived: 1.13; 95% CI 1.11-1.16) and decreased with higher educational levels (OR for low educated: 1.37; 95% CI 1.34-1.40). Contextual SEP did not show any association with recall or cancer detection rates, but individual SEP had an impact. Women with lower educational levels had a statistically significant 19% lower odds of being recalled and a statistically significant 20% lower odds of being diagnosed with cancer. Additionally, immigrant women were less likely to participate in screening, be recalled, or receive a cancer diagnosis. Educational level consistently influenced the analyzed screening indicators, while contextual deprivation appeared to have less importance. It is likely that women living in less deprived areas and with higher education have greater access to opportunistic screening.
期刊介绍:
npj Breast Cancer publishes original research articles, reviews, brief correspondence, meeting reports, editorial summaries and hypothesis generating observations which could be unexplained or preliminary findings from experiments, novel ideas, or the framing of new questions that need to be solved. Featured topics of the journal include imaging, immunotherapy, molecular classification of disease, mechanism-based therapies largely targeting signal transduction pathways, carcinogenesis including hereditary susceptibility and molecular epidemiology, survivorship issues including long-term toxicities of treatment and secondary neoplasm occurrence, the biophysics of cancer, mechanisms of metastasis and their perturbation, and studies of the tumor microenvironment.