快速自我驱动支气管镜模拟训练中的学习收获:比较低保真和高保真模型的初步研究。

IF 3.3 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Jules Milesi, Julie Tronchetti, Jean-Baptiste Lovato, Ngoc Anh Thu Nguyen, Hervé Dutau, Philippe Astoul
{"title":"快速自我驱动支气管镜模拟训练中的学习收获:比较低保真和高保真模型的初步研究。","authors":"Jules Milesi, Julie Tronchetti, Jean-Baptiste Lovato, Ngoc Anh Thu Nguyen, Hervé Dutau, Philippe Astoul","doi":"10.1097/LBR.0000000000000972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nowadays, there is a growing need for competence in bronchoscopy. However, traditional mentorship-based training presents limitations in learning consistency, subjective evaluation, and patient safety concerns. Simulation-based training has gained attention for its potential to enhance skill acquisition and objective assessment. This study explores the effectiveness of self-driven bronchoscopy simulation training using high-fidelity (HFM) and low-fidelity (LFM) models on novice medical students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical students without prior bronchoscopy experience were randomly assigned to a self-learn using either HFM or LFM for 4 hours. Pre and posttests were conducted to evaluate the students' knowledge and skill gains with a modified Bronchoscopy Skills and Tasks Assessment Tool. After their test results, students were asked to answer a questionnaire based on a Likert Scale to assess their satisfaction with self-learning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed significant progression in both groups, but the HFM group outperformed the LFM group in terms of total score, knowledge, skills, and procedure duration. Participant satisfaction with the educational process was generally high in both groups. However, this study has certain limitations, such as a small sample size, a short training period, and the absence of real evaluation in patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates the efficacy of self-driven bronchoscopy simulation training using HFM and LFM of bronchoscopy, with HFM offering superior gain for skill and knowledge. Larger-scale and long-term studies are recommended to further investigate the effectiveness of this self-learning and retention of the bronchoscopy knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":15268,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning Gain During a Fast Self-driven Bronchoscopy Simulation Training: A Preliminary Study Comparing Low and High-fidelity Models.\",\"authors\":\"Jules Milesi, Julie Tronchetti, Jean-Baptiste Lovato, Ngoc Anh Thu Nguyen, Hervé Dutau, Philippe Astoul\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/LBR.0000000000000972\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nowadays, there is a growing need for competence in bronchoscopy. However, traditional mentorship-based training presents limitations in learning consistency, subjective evaluation, and patient safety concerns. Simulation-based training has gained attention for its potential to enhance skill acquisition and objective assessment. This study explores the effectiveness of self-driven bronchoscopy simulation training using high-fidelity (HFM) and low-fidelity (LFM) models on novice medical students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical students without prior bronchoscopy experience were randomly assigned to a self-learn using either HFM or LFM for 4 hours. Pre and posttests were conducted to evaluate the students' knowledge and skill gains with a modified Bronchoscopy Skills and Tasks Assessment Tool. After their test results, students were asked to answer a questionnaire based on a Likert Scale to assess their satisfaction with self-learning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed significant progression in both groups, but the HFM group outperformed the LFM group in terms of total score, knowledge, skills, and procedure duration. Participant satisfaction with the educational process was generally high in both groups. However, this study has certain limitations, such as a small sample size, a short training period, and the absence of real evaluation in patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates the efficacy of self-driven bronchoscopy simulation training using HFM and LFM of bronchoscopy, with HFM offering superior gain for skill and knowledge. Larger-scale and long-term studies are recommended to further investigate the effectiveness of this self-learning and retention of the bronchoscopy knowledge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/LBR.0000000000000972\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LBR.0000000000000972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:如今,对支气管镜检查能力的需求日益增长。然而,传统的指导式培训在学习一致性、主观评价和患者安全方面存在局限性。基于模拟的培训因其增强技能掌握和客观评估的潜力而备受关注。本研究探讨了使用高保真(HFM)和低保真(LFM)模型对新手医学生进行自我驱动支气管镜模拟训练的效果:方法: 没有支气管镜检查经验的医科学生被随机分配到使用 HFM 或 LFM 的自我学习中,为期 4 小时。使用修改后的支气管镜检查技能和任务评估工具进行前测和后测,以评估学生的知识和技能收获。测试结果出来后,学生们被要求回答一份基于李克特量表的问卷,以评估他们对自学的满意度:结果显示,两组学生的成绩均有明显进步,但高频组在总分、知识、技能和手术持续时间方面均优于低频组。两组学员对教学过程的满意度普遍较高。不过,这项研究也有一定的局限性,如样本量较小、培训时间较短、没有对患者进行实际评估等:本研究表明,使用高频和低频支气管镜进行自我驱动的支气管镜模拟训练是有效的,其中高频支气管镜在技能和知识方面的收获更大。建议进行更大规模的长期研究,以进一步探讨这种自我学习的有效性以及支气管镜知识的保留情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learning Gain During a Fast Self-driven Bronchoscopy Simulation Training: A Preliminary Study Comparing Low and High-fidelity Models.

Background: Nowadays, there is a growing need for competence in bronchoscopy. However, traditional mentorship-based training presents limitations in learning consistency, subjective evaluation, and patient safety concerns. Simulation-based training has gained attention for its potential to enhance skill acquisition and objective assessment. This study explores the effectiveness of self-driven bronchoscopy simulation training using high-fidelity (HFM) and low-fidelity (LFM) models on novice medical students.

Methods: Medical students without prior bronchoscopy experience were randomly assigned to a self-learn using either HFM or LFM for 4 hours. Pre and posttests were conducted to evaluate the students' knowledge and skill gains with a modified Bronchoscopy Skills and Tasks Assessment Tool. After their test results, students were asked to answer a questionnaire based on a Likert Scale to assess their satisfaction with self-learning.

Results: The results revealed significant progression in both groups, but the HFM group outperformed the LFM group in terms of total score, knowledge, skills, and procedure duration. Participant satisfaction with the educational process was generally high in both groups. However, this study has certain limitations, such as a small sample size, a short training period, and the absence of real evaluation in patients.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates the efficacy of self-driven bronchoscopy simulation training using HFM and LFM of bronchoscopy, with HFM offering superior gain for skill and knowledge. Larger-scale and long-term studies are recommended to further investigate the effectiveness of this self-learning and retention of the bronchoscopy knowledge.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
121
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信