{"title":"研磨和抛光工艺对高透光率 5 mol% 部分稳定钇氧化锆表面粗糙度、挠曲强度和相变的影响","authors":"Chatnarong Phatphutthitham, Boondarick Niyatiwatchanchai, Phakvalunch Rujiraprasert, Junji Tagami, Thanaphum Osathanon, Anucharte Srijunbarl, Thawanrat Singthong, Sarat Suriyasangpetch, Dusit Nantanapiboon","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1787001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong> This study evaluated surface roughness, biaxial flexural strength, and phase transformation of 5Y-PSZ after grinding and polishing with different protocols.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong> Two commercial 5Y-PSZ, Lava Esthetic (L) and Cercon xt (C), were used and divided into 3 groups: LC and CC represented unpolished control groups; LE and CE were polished with protocol I (EVE DIASYNT® PLUS HP following with EVE DIACERA RA); and LJ and CJ were polished with protocol II (Superfine diamond bur following with Jota ZIR Gloss polishing kit). Surface roughness was evaluated after polishing step-by-step with a contact-type profilometer. After high-gross polishing, the specimens were subjected to biaxial flexural strength test, crystallographic microstructure analysis using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD), and surface micro-topography using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>Surface roughness differences after each step and biaxial flexural strength between groups were evaluated with one-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni post-hoc analysis. Changes in surface roughness across four different time points within groups were assessed using one-way repeated measures ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni post-hoc analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> After high-gross polishing, both polishing protocols showed significantly lower surface roughness than the grinding group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The LE and CE groups exhibited the highest surface roughness values, which were significant differences from the LJ and CJ groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The LE group showed significantly lower biaxial flexural strength compared to the LC group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the CE and CJ groups compared to the control group (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Furthermore, all polishing protocols did not change the phase transformation of zirconia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Polishing protocol II provided a smoother surface than the protocol I after high-gross polishing, while the biaxial flexural strength of materials remained unaffected.</p>","PeriodicalId":12028,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"80-89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11750342/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Grinding and Polishing Protocols on Surface Roughness, Flexural Strength, and Phase Transformation of High-Translucent 5 mol% Yttria-Partially Stabilized Zirconia.\",\"authors\":\"Chatnarong Phatphutthitham, Boondarick Niyatiwatchanchai, Phakvalunch Rujiraprasert, Junji Tagami, Thanaphum Osathanon, Anucharte Srijunbarl, Thawanrat Singthong, Sarat Suriyasangpetch, Dusit Nantanapiboon\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0044-1787001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong> This study evaluated surface roughness, biaxial flexural strength, and phase transformation of 5Y-PSZ after grinding and polishing with different protocols.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong> Two commercial 5Y-PSZ, Lava Esthetic (L) and Cercon xt (C), were used and divided into 3 groups: LC and CC represented unpolished control groups; LE and CE were polished with protocol I (EVE DIASYNT® PLUS HP following with EVE DIACERA RA); and LJ and CJ were polished with protocol II (Superfine diamond bur following with Jota ZIR Gloss polishing kit). Surface roughness was evaluated after polishing step-by-step with a contact-type profilometer. After high-gross polishing, the specimens were subjected to biaxial flexural strength test, crystallographic microstructure analysis using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD), and surface micro-topography using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>Surface roughness differences after each step and biaxial flexural strength between groups were evaluated with one-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni post-hoc analysis. Changes in surface roughness across four different time points within groups were assessed using one-way repeated measures ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni post-hoc analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> After high-gross polishing, both polishing protocols showed significantly lower surface roughness than the grinding group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The LE and CE groups exhibited the highest surface roughness values, which were significant differences from the LJ and CJ groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The LE group showed significantly lower biaxial flexural strength compared to the LC group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the CE and CJ groups compared to the control group (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Furthermore, all polishing protocols did not change the phase transformation of zirconia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Polishing protocol II provided a smoother surface than the protocol I after high-gross polishing, while the biaxial flexural strength of materials remained unaffected.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"80-89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11750342/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究评估了 5Y-PSZ 经过不同方案研磨和抛光后的表面粗糙度、双轴抗折强度和相变:本研究评估了 5Y-PSZ 经不同方案研磨和抛光后的表面粗糙度、双轴抗弯强度和相变情况:使用两种商用 5Y-PSZ Lava Esthetic (L) 和 Cercon xt (C),并将其分为 3 组:LC 和 CC 代表未抛光对照组;LE 和 CE 采用方案 I(EVE DIASYNT® PLUS HP 和 EVE DIACERA RA)抛光;LJ 和 CJ 采用方案 II(Superfine diamond bur 和 Jota ZIR Gloss 抛光套件)抛光。使用接触式轮廓仪逐级抛光后评估表面粗糙度。高粗糙度抛光后,对试样进行双轴抗弯强度测试,使用 X 射线衍射仪(XRD)进行晶体微观结构分析,并使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)进行表面微观形貌分析:采用单因素方差分析评估各步骤后的表面粗糙度差异和组间双轴抗弯强度差异,然后进行 Bonferroni 事后分析。使用单因素重复测量方差分析评估组内四个不同时间点的表面粗糙度变化,然后进行 Bonferroni 事后分析:结果:高毛坯抛光后,两种抛光方案的表面粗糙度都明显低于研磨组(p p p p > 0.05)。此外,所有抛光方案都没有改变氧化锆的相变:结论:高毛面抛光后,抛光方案 II 比抛光方案 I 的表面更光滑,而材料的双轴抗弯强度未受影响。
Effect of Grinding and Polishing Protocols on Surface Roughness, Flexural Strength, and Phase Transformation of High-Translucent 5 mol% Yttria-Partially Stabilized Zirconia.
Objectives: This study evaluated surface roughness, biaxial flexural strength, and phase transformation of 5Y-PSZ after grinding and polishing with different protocols.
Material and methods: Two commercial 5Y-PSZ, Lava Esthetic (L) and Cercon xt (C), were used and divided into 3 groups: LC and CC represented unpolished control groups; LE and CE were polished with protocol I (EVE DIASYNT® PLUS HP following with EVE DIACERA RA); and LJ and CJ were polished with protocol II (Superfine diamond bur following with Jota ZIR Gloss polishing kit). Surface roughness was evaluated after polishing step-by-step with a contact-type profilometer. After high-gross polishing, the specimens were subjected to biaxial flexural strength test, crystallographic microstructure analysis using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD), and surface micro-topography using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
Statistical analysis: Surface roughness differences after each step and biaxial flexural strength between groups were evaluated with one-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni post-hoc analysis. Changes in surface roughness across four different time points within groups were assessed using one-way repeated measures ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni post-hoc analysis.
Results: After high-gross polishing, both polishing protocols showed significantly lower surface roughness than the grinding group (p < 0.05). The LE and CE groups exhibited the highest surface roughness values, which were significant differences from the LJ and CJ groups (p < 0.05). The LE group showed significantly lower biaxial flexural strength compared to the LC group (p < 0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the CE and CJ groups compared to the control group (p > 0.05). Furthermore, all polishing protocols did not change the phase transformation of zirconia.
Conclusion: Polishing protocol II provided a smoother surface than the protocol I after high-gross polishing, while the biaxial flexural strength of materials remained unaffected.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Dentistry is the official journal of the Dental Investigations Society, based in Turkey. It is a double-blinded peer-reviewed, Open Access, multi-disciplinary international journal addressing various aspects of dentistry. The journal''s board consists of eminent investigators in dentistry from across the globe and presents an ideal international composition. The journal encourages its authors to submit original investigations, reviews, and reports addressing various divisions of dentistry including oral pathology, prosthodontics, endodontics, orthodontics etc. It is available both online and in print.