David J Nolan, Jonathan DaRoza, Robin Brody, Krishna Ganta, Katherine Luzuriaga, Chris Huston, Simon Rosenthal, Susanna L Lamers, Rebecca Rose
{"title":"比较金标准桑格测序与 HIV-1 gp160 单模板扩增子的两种下一代测序平台。","authors":"David J Nolan, Jonathan DaRoza, Robin Brody, Krishna Ganta, Katherine Luzuriaga, Chris Huston, Simon Rosenthal, Susanna L Lamers, Rebecca Rose","doi":"10.1089/AID.2024.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our goal was to assess the accuracy of next generation sequencing (NGS) compared with Sanger. We performed single genome amplification (SGA) of HIV-1 <i>gp160</i> on extracted tissue DNA from two HIV+ individuals. Amplicons (<i>n</i> = 30) were sequenced with Sanger or reamplified with barcoded primers and pooled before sequencing using Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) and Pacific Biosciences (PB). For each amplicon, a consensus sequence for NGS reads was obtained by (1) mapping reads to the Sanger sequence when available (\"reference-based\") or (2) mapping reads to a \"pseudo-reference\" sequence, i.e., a consensus sequence of a subset of NGS reads (\"reference-free\"). PB reads were clustered based on genetic similarity. A Sanger consensus sequence was obtained for 23/30 amplicons, for which all NGS consensus sequences were identical (<i>n</i> = 9) or nearly identical (<i>n</i> = 14) compared with Sanger. For the nine mismatches between Sanger/NGS, the nucleotide in the NGS sequence matched all other sequences from that patient. Of the 7/30 amplicons without a Sanger sequence, NGS sequences had ≥35 ambiguous calls in five amplicons and 0 ambiguities in two amplicons. Analysis of the electropherograms showed failure of a single sequencing primer for the latter two amplicons (consistent with a single template) and overlapping peaks for the other five (consistent with multiple templates). Clustering results closely followed the Sanger/NGS consensus results, where amplicons derived from a single template also had a single cluster and vice versa (with one exception, which could be the result of barcode misidentification). Representative sequences from the clusters contained 2-13 differences compared with Sanger/NGS. In summary, we show that both ONT and PB can produce amplicon consensus sequences with similar or higher accuracy compared with Sanger and, importantly, without the need for a known reference sequence. Clustering could be useful in some circumstances to predict or confirm the presence of multiple starting templates.</p>","PeriodicalId":7544,"journal":{"name":"AIDS research and human retroviruses","volume":" ","pages":"659-669"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Gold-Standard Sanger Sequencing with Two Next-Generation Sequencing Platforms of HIV-1 <i>gp160</i> Single Genome Amplicons.\",\"authors\":\"David J Nolan, Jonathan DaRoza, Robin Brody, Krishna Ganta, Katherine Luzuriaga, Chris Huston, Simon Rosenthal, Susanna L Lamers, Rebecca Rose\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/AID.2024.0012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Our goal was to assess the accuracy of next generation sequencing (NGS) compared with Sanger. We performed single genome amplification (SGA) of HIV-1 <i>gp160</i> on extracted tissue DNA from two HIV+ individuals. Amplicons (<i>n</i> = 30) were sequenced with Sanger or reamplified with barcoded primers and pooled before sequencing using Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) and Pacific Biosciences (PB). For each amplicon, a consensus sequence for NGS reads was obtained by (1) mapping reads to the Sanger sequence when available (\\\"reference-based\\\") or (2) mapping reads to a \\\"pseudo-reference\\\" sequence, i.e., a consensus sequence of a subset of NGS reads (\\\"reference-free\\\"). PB reads were clustered based on genetic similarity. A Sanger consensus sequence was obtained for 23/30 amplicons, for which all NGS consensus sequences were identical (<i>n</i> = 9) or nearly identical (<i>n</i> = 14) compared with Sanger. For the nine mismatches between Sanger/NGS, the nucleotide in the NGS sequence matched all other sequences from that patient. Of the 7/30 amplicons without a Sanger sequence, NGS sequences had ≥35 ambiguous calls in five amplicons and 0 ambiguities in two amplicons. Analysis of the electropherograms showed failure of a single sequencing primer for the latter two amplicons (consistent with a single template) and overlapping peaks for the other five (consistent with multiple templates). Clustering results closely followed the Sanger/NGS consensus results, where amplicons derived from a single template also had a single cluster and vice versa (with one exception, which could be the result of barcode misidentification). Representative sequences from the clusters contained 2-13 differences compared with Sanger/NGS. In summary, we show that both ONT and PB can produce amplicon consensus sequences with similar or higher accuracy compared with Sanger and, importantly, without the need for a known reference sequence. Clustering could be useful in some circumstances to predict or confirm the presence of multiple starting templates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AIDS research and human retroviruses\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"659-669\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AIDS research and human retroviruses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/AID.2024.0012\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS research and human retroviruses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/AID.2024.0012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparing Gold-Standard Sanger Sequencing with Two Next-Generation Sequencing Platforms of HIV-1 gp160 Single Genome Amplicons.
Our goal was to assess the accuracy of next generation sequencing (NGS) compared with Sanger. We performed single genome amplification (SGA) of HIV-1 gp160 on extracted tissue DNA from two HIV+ individuals. Amplicons (n = 30) were sequenced with Sanger or reamplified with barcoded primers and pooled before sequencing using Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) and Pacific Biosciences (PB). For each amplicon, a consensus sequence for NGS reads was obtained by (1) mapping reads to the Sanger sequence when available ("reference-based") or (2) mapping reads to a "pseudo-reference" sequence, i.e., a consensus sequence of a subset of NGS reads ("reference-free"). PB reads were clustered based on genetic similarity. A Sanger consensus sequence was obtained for 23/30 amplicons, for which all NGS consensus sequences were identical (n = 9) or nearly identical (n = 14) compared with Sanger. For the nine mismatches between Sanger/NGS, the nucleotide in the NGS sequence matched all other sequences from that patient. Of the 7/30 amplicons without a Sanger sequence, NGS sequences had ≥35 ambiguous calls in five amplicons and 0 ambiguities in two amplicons. Analysis of the electropherograms showed failure of a single sequencing primer for the latter two amplicons (consistent with a single template) and overlapping peaks for the other five (consistent with multiple templates). Clustering results closely followed the Sanger/NGS consensus results, where amplicons derived from a single template also had a single cluster and vice versa (with one exception, which could be the result of barcode misidentification). Representative sequences from the clusters contained 2-13 differences compared with Sanger/NGS. In summary, we show that both ONT and PB can produce amplicon consensus sequences with similar or higher accuracy compared with Sanger and, importantly, without the need for a known reference sequence. Clustering could be useful in some circumstances to predict or confirm the presence of multiple starting templates.
期刊介绍:
AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses was the very first AIDS publication in the field over 30 years ago, and today it is still the critical resource advancing research in retroviruses, including AIDS. The Journal provides the broadest coverage from molecular biology to clinical studies and outcomes research, focusing on developments in prevention science, novel therapeutics, and immune-restorative approaches. Cutting-edge papers on the latest progress and research advances through clinical trials and examination of targeted antiretroviral agents lead to improvements in translational medicine for optimal treatment outcomes.
AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses coverage includes:
HIV cure research
HIV prevention science
- Vaccine research
- Systemic and Topical PreP
Molecular and cell biology of HIV and SIV
Developments in HIV pathogenesis and comorbidities
Molecular biology, immunology, and epidemiology of HTLV
Pharmacology of HIV therapy
Social and behavioral science
Rapid publication of emerging sequence information.