超声波与非电离技术在肉类去污方面的新兴应用对比综述

IF 8.7 1区 化学 Q1 ACOUSTICS
Bo-Ru Chen , Ume Roobab , Ghulam Muhammad Madni , Gholamreza Abdi , Xin-An Zeng , Rana Muhammad Aadil
{"title":"超声波与非电离技术在肉类去污方面的新兴应用对比综述","authors":"Bo-Ru Chen ,&nbsp;Ume Roobab ,&nbsp;Ghulam Muhammad Madni ,&nbsp;Gholamreza Abdi ,&nbsp;Xin-An Zeng ,&nbsp;Rana Muhammad Aadil","doi":"10.1016/j.ultsonch.2024.106962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Meat is highly susceptible to contamination with harmful microorganisms throughout the production, processing, and storage chain, posing a significant public health risk. Traditional decontamination methods like chemical sanitizers and heat treatments often compromise meat quality, generate harmful residues, and require high energy inputs. This necessitates the exploration of alternative non-ionizing technologies for ensuring meat safety and quality. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the latest advancements, limitations, and future prospects of non-ionizing technologies for meat decontamination, with a specific focus on ultrasonication. It further investigates the comparative advantages and disadvantages of ultrasonication against other prominent non-ionizing technologies such as microwaves, ultraviolet (UV) light, and pulsed light. Additionally, it explores the potential of integrating these technologies within a multi-hurdle strategy to achieve enhanced decontamination across the meat surface and within the matrix. While non-ionizing technologies have demonstrated promising results in reducing microbial populations while preserving meat quality attributes, challenges remain. These include optimizing processing parameters, addressing regulatory considerations, and ensuring cost-effectiveness for large-scale adoption. Combining these technologies with other methods like antimicrobial agents, packaging, and hurdle technology holds promise for further enhancing pathogen elimination while safeguarding meat quality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":442,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasonics Sonochemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350417724002104/pdfft?md5=c44261e43270f8ed2a6a856e3870ffaa&pid=1-s2.0-S1350417724002104-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A review of emerging applications of ultrasonication in Comparison with non-ionizing technologies for meat decontamination\",\"authors\":\"Bo-Ru Chen ,&nbsp;Ume Roobab ,&nbsp;Ghulam Muhammad Madni ,&nbsp;Gholamreza Abdi ,&nbsp;Xin-An Zeng ,&nbsp;Rana Muhammad Aadil\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ultsonch.2024.106962\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Meat is highly susceptible to contamination with harmful microorganisms throughout the production, processing, and storage chain, posing a significant public health risk. Traditional decontamination methods like chemical sanitizers and heat treatments often compromise meat quality, generate harmful residues, and require high energy inputs. This necessitates the exploration of alternative non-ionizing technologies for ensuring meat safety and quality. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the latest advancements, limitations, and future prospects of non-ionizing technologies for meat decontamination, with a specific focus on ultrasonication. It further investigates the comparative advantages and disadvantages of ultrasonication against other prominent non-ionizing technologies such as microwaves, ultraviolet (UV) light, and pulsed light. Additionally, it explores the potential of integrating these technologies within a multi-hurdle strategy to achieve enhanced decontamination across the meat surface and within the matrix. While non-ionizing technologies have demonstrated promising results in reducing microbial populations while preserving meat quality attributes, challenges remain. These include optimizing processing parameters, addressing regulatory considerations, and ensuring cost-effectiveness for large-scale adoption. Combining these technologies with other methods like antimicrobial agents, packaging, and hurdle technology holds promise for further enhancing pathogen elimination while safeguarding meat quality.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ultrasonics Sonochemistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350417724002104/pdfft?md5=c44261e43270f8ed2a6a856e3870ffaa&pid=1-s2.0-S1350417724002104-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ultrasonics Sonochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350417724002104\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasonics Sonochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350417724002104","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肉类在整个生产、加工和储存链中极易受到有害微生物的污染,对公众健康构成重大威胁。传统的去污方法,如化学消毒剂和热处理,往往会损害肉类质量,产生有害残留物,并需要高能量投入。因此,有必要探索确保肉类安全和质量的替代性非电离技术。本综述全面分析了用于肉类去污的非电离技术的最新进展、局限性和未来前景,并特别关注超声波技术。它进一步研究了超声波与微波、紫外线 (UV) 和脉冲光等其他著名非电离技术的优缺点比较。此外,它还探讨了将这些技术整合到多重净化策略中的潜力,以实现对肉类表面和基质内部的强化净化。虽然非电离技术在减少微生物数量、保持肉类质量属性方面取得了可喜的成果,但挑战依然存在。这些挑战包括优化加工参数、解决监管问题以及确保大规模应用的成本效益。将这些技术与其他方法(如抗菌剂、包装和屏障技术)相结合,有望在保障肉类质量的同时进一步消除病原体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A review of emerging applications of ultrasonication in Comparison with non-ionizing technologies for meat decontamination

Meat is highly susceptible to contamination with harmful microorganisms throughout the production, processing, and storage chain, posing a significant public health risk. Traditional decontamination methods like chemical sanitizers and heat treatments often compromise meat quality, generate harmful residues, and require high energy inputs. This necessitates the exploration of alternative non-ionizing technologies for ensuring meat safety and quality. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the latest advancements, limitations, and future prospects of non-ionizing technologies for meat decontamination, with a specific focus on ultrasonication. It further investigates the comparative advantages and disadvantages of ultrasonication against other prominent non-ionizing technologies such as microwaves, ultraviolet (UV) light, and pulsed light. Additionally, it explores the potential of integrating these technologies within a multi-hurdle strategy to achieve enhanced decontamination across the meat surface and within the matrix. While non-ionizing technologies have demonstrated promising results in reducing microbial populations while preserving meat quality attributes, challenges remain. These include optimizing processing parameters, addressing regulatory considerations, and ensuring cost-effectiveness for large-scale adoption. Combining these technologies with other methods like antimicrobial agents, packaging, and hurdle technology holds promise for further enhancing pathogen elimination while safeguarding meat quality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ultrasonics Sonochemistry
Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
11.90%
发文量
361
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: Ultrasonics Sonochemistry stands as a premier international journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality research articles primarily focusing on chemical reactions and reactors induced by ultrasonic waves, known as sonochemistry. Beyond chemical reactions, the journal also welcomes contributions related to cavitation-induced events and processing, including sonoluminescence, and the transformation of materials on chemical, physical, and biological levels. Since its inception in 1994, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry has consistently maintained a top ranking in the "Acoustics" category, reflecting its esteemed reputation in the field. The journal publishes exceptional papers covering various areas of ultrasonics and sonochemistry. Its contributions are highly regarded by both academia and industry stakeholders, demonstrating its relevance and impact in advancing research and innovation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信