{"title":"萱草(Hemerocallis spp.","authors":"Amanda Howland, Emilie Cole , Luisa Parrado, Marisol Quintanilla","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2024.106820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Michigan has the third largest floriculture industry in the United States, with the production of daylily (<em>Hemerocallis</em> spp.) a top commodity. Daylily is one of the most economically important ornamental plants, yet their production is plagued by plant-parasitic nematodes, especially the northern root-knot nematode, <em>Meloidogyne hapla</em>. Seven treatments in combination with a high-carbon, cow manure compost were selected for a three-year field trial at a commercial nursery in Zeeland, MI to discern the best <em>M. hapla</em> management strategies in daylily field production for its entire production cycle. Treatments included the compost manure by itself, Indemnify as a soil drench and as a pre-plant dip both together and separately, AzaGuard, TerraClean 5.0, and an untreated control. Additionally, a similar multi-year greenhouse trial was conducted and included a new treatment: Majestene 304. Results showed that the high-carbon, cow manure compost + Indemnify as a soil drench by itself and in combination as a pre-plant dip were the most effective treatments in reducing <em>M. hapla</em> population levels; in the greenhouse experiment, Indemnify reduced population levels by 83%. Majestene 304 provided the next best control of <em>M. hapla,</em> yet it had the highest gall ratings; the compost by itself was not effective, having higher <em>M. hapla</em> populations than the control in both experiments. Lastly, both trials emphasize the importance of applying these management strategies every year for the best <em>M. hapla</em> management. These results give the ornamental plant industry new, effective management systems to control <em>M. hapla</em> in ornamental plant field production.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New management systems for northern root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne hapla Chitwood Tylenchida: Heteroderidae) in daylily (Hemerocallis spp.) ornamental plant production fields\",\"authors\":\"Amanda Howland, Emilie Cole , Luisa Parrado, Marisol Quintanilla\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cropro.2024.106820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Michigan has the third largest floriculture industry in the United States, with the production of daylily (<em>Hemerocallis</em> spp.) a top commodity. Daylily is one of the most economically important ornamental plants, yet their production is plagued by plant-parasitic nematodes, especially the northern root-knot nematode, <em>Meloidogyne hapla</em>. Seven treatments in combination with a high-carbon, cow manure compost were selected for a three-year field trial at a commercial nursery in Zeeland, MI to discern the best <em>M. hapla</em> management strategies in daylily field production for its entire production cycle. Treatments included the compost manure by itself, Indemnify as a soil drench and as a pre-plant dip both together and separately, AzaGuard, TerraClean 5.0, and an untreated control. Additionally, a similar multi-year greenhouse trial was conducted and included a new treatment: Majestene 304. Results showed that the high-carbon, cow manure compost + Indemnify as a soil drench by itself and in combination as a pre-plant dip were the most effective treatments in reducing <em>M. hapla</em> population levels; in the greenhouse experiment, Indemnify reduced population levels by 83%. Majestene 304 provided the next best control of <em>M. hapla,</em> yet it had the highest gall ratings; the compost by itself was not effective, having higher <em>M. hapla</em> populations than the control in both experiments. Lastly, both trials emphasize the importance of applying these management strategies every year for the best <em>M. hapla</em> management. These results give the ornamental plant industry new, effective management systems to control <em>M. hapla</em> in ornamental plant field production.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crop Protection\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crop Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219424002485\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219424002485","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
New management systems for northern root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne hapla Chitwood Tylenchida: Heteroderidae) in daylily (Hemerocallis spp.) ornamental plant production fields
Michigan has the third largest floriculture industry in the United States, with the production of daylily (Hemerocallis spp.) a top commodity. Daylily is one of the most economically important ornamental plants, yet their production is plagued by plant-parasitic nematodes, especially the northern root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne hapla. Seven treatments in combination with a high-carbon, cow manure compost were selected for a three-year field trial at a commercial nursery in Zeeland, MI to discern the best M. hapla management strategies in daylily field production for its entire production cycle. Treatments included the compost manure by itself, Indemnify as a soil drench and as a pre-plant dip both together and separately, AzaGuard, TerraClean 5.0, and an untreated control. Additionally, a similar multi-year greenhouse trial was conducted and included a new treatment: Majestene 304. Results showed that the high-carbon, cow manure compost + Indemnify as a soil drench by itself and in combination as a pre-plant dip were the most effective treatments in reducing M. hapla population levels; in the greenhouse experiment, Indemnify reduced population levels by 83%. Majestene 304 provided the next best control of M. hapla, yet it had the highest gall ratings; the compost by itself was not effective, having higher M. hapla populations than the control in both experiments. Lastly, both trials emphasize the importance of applying these management strategies every year for the best M. hapla management. These results give the ornamental plant industry new, effective management systems to control M. hapla in ornamental plant field production.
期刊介绍:
The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics:
-Abiotic damage-
Agronomic control methods-
Assessment of pest and disease damage-
Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases-
Biological control-
Biorational pesticides-
Control of animal pests of world crops-
Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms-
Control of weeds and integrated management-
Economic considerations-
Effects of plant growth regulators-
Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use-
Environmental effects of pesticides-
Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control-
GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications-
Importance and control of postharvest crop losses-
Integrated control-
Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies-
Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection-
Pesticide application methods-
Pest management-
Phytobiomes for pest and disease control-
Resistance management-
Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.