验证全关节置换术后农村患者出院风险计算器。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Journal of Arthroplasty Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2024.06.047
Yagiz Ozdag, Gabriel S Makar, Daniel E Goltz, Thorsten M Seyler, John J Mercuri, Mark P Pallis
{"title":"验证全关节置换术后农村患者出院风险计算器。","authors":"Yagiz Ozdag, Gabriel S Makar, Daniel E Goltz, Thorsten M Seyler, John J Mercuri, Mark P Pallis","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.06.047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As the volume of total joint arthroplasty in the US continues to grow, new challenges surrounding appropriate discharge surface. Arthroplasty literature has demonstrated discharge disposition to postacute care facilities carries major risks regarding the need for revision surgery, patient comorbidities, and financial burden. To quantify, categorize, and mitigate risks, a decision tool that uses preoperative patient variables has previously been published and validated using an urban patient population. The aim of our investigation was to validate the same predictive model using patients in a rural setting undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All TKA and THA procedures that were performed between January 2012 and September 2022 at our institution were collected. A total of 9,477 cases (39.6% TKA, 60.4% THA) were included for the validation analysis. There were 9 preoperative variables that were extracted in an automated fashion from the electronic medical record. Included patients were then run through the predictive model, generating a risk score representing that patient's differential risk of discharge to a skilled nursing facility versus home. Overall accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were calculated after obtaining risk scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Score cutoff equally maximizing sensitivity and specificity was 0.23, and the proportion of correct classifications by the predictive tool in this study population was found to be 0.723, with an area under the curve of 0.788 - both higher than previously published accuracy levels. With the threshold of 0.23, sensitivity and specificity were found to be 0.720 and 0.723, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The risk calculator showed very good accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in predicting discharge location for rural patients undergoing TKA and THA, with accuracy even higher than in urban populations. The model provides an easy-to-use interface, with automation representing a viable tool in helping with shared decision-making regarding postoperative discharge plans.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a Discharge Risk Calculator for Rural Patients Following Total Joint Arthroplasty.\",\"authors\":\"Yagiz Ozdag, Gabriel S Makar, Daniel E Goltz, Thorsten M Seyler, John J Mercuri, Mark P Pallis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arth.2024.06.047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As the volume of total joint arthroplasty in the US continues to grow, new challenges surrounding appropriate discharge surface. Arthroplasty literature has demonstrated discharge disposition to postacute care facilities carries major risks regarding the need for revision surgery, patient comorbidities, and financial burden. To quantify, categorize, and mitigate risks, a decision tool that uses preoperative patient variables has previously been published and validated using an urban patient population. The aim of our investigation was to validate the same predictive model using patients in a rural setting undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All TKA and THA procedures that were performed between January 2012 and September 2022 at our institution were collected. A total of 9,477 cases (39.6% TKA, 60.4% THA) were included for the validation analysis. There were 9 preoperative variables that were extracted in an automated fashion from the electronic medical record. Included patients were then run through the predictive model, generating a risk score representing that patient's differential risk of discharge to a skilled nursing facility versus home. Overall accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were calculated after obtaining risk scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Score cutoff equally maximizing sensitivity and specificity was 0.23, and the proportion of correct classifications by the predictive tool in this study population was found to be 0.723, with an area under the curve of 0.788 - both higher than previously published accuracy levels. With the threshold of 0.23, sensitivity and specificity were found to be 0.720 and 0.723, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The risk calculator showed very good accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in predicting discharge location for rural patients undergoing TKA and THA, with accuracy even higher than in urban populations. The model provides an easy-to-use interface, with automation representing a viable tool in helping with shared decision-making regarding postoperative discharge plans.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arthroplasty\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arthroplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.06.047\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.06.047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:随着美国全关节成形术(TJA)的数量不断增加,围绕适当出院的新挑战也随之浮出水面。关节置换术文献表明,向急性期后护理机构的出院处置在翻修手术需求、患者并发症和经济负担方面存在重大风险。为了量化、分类和减轻风险,以前曾发表过一种使用术前患者变量的决策工具,并在城市患者群体中进行了验证。我们调查的目的是利用农村地区接受全膝关节置换术(TKA)和全髋关节置换术(THA)的患者验证相同的预测模型:收集了 2012 年 1 月至 2022 年 9 月期间在我院进行的所有 TKA 和 THA 手术。共有9,477个病例(39.6%为TKA,60.4%为THA)被纳入验证分析。从电子病历中自动提取了九个术前变量。然后对纳入的患者进行预测模型运算,生成一个风险评分,代表该患者出院到专业护理机构(SNF)与出院回家的不同风险。获得风险评分后,计算总体准确性、灵敏度和特异性:灵敏度和特异性同样最大化的分数临界值为 0.23,在该研究人群中,预测工具的正确分类比例为 0.723,曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.788,均高于之前公布的准确度水平。在阈值为 0.23 时,灵敏度和特异度分别为 0.720 和 0.723:风险计算器在预测接受 TKA 和 THA 手术的农村患者的出院地点方面显示出非常高的准确性、灵敏度和特异性,准确性甚至高于城市人群。该模型提供了一个易于使用的界面,其自动化代表了一种可行的工具,有助于就术后出院计划进行共同决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of a Discharge Risk Calculator for Rural Patients Following Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Background: As the volume of total joint arthroplasty in the US continues to grow, new challenges surrounding appropriate discharge surface. Arthroplasty literature has demonstrated discharge disposition to postacute care facilities carries major risks regarding the need for revision surgery, patient comorbidities, and financial burden. To quantify, categorize, and mitigate risks, a decision tool that uses preoperative patient variables has previously been published and validated using an urban patient population. The aim of our investigation was to validate the same predictive model using patients in a rural setting undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty.

Methods: All TKA and THA procedures that were performed between January 2012 and September 2022 at our institution were collected. A total of 9,477 cases (39.6% TKA, 60.4% THA) were included for the validation analysis. There were 9 preoperative variables that were extracted in an automated fashion from the electronic medical record. Included patients were then run through the predictive model, generating a risk score representing that patient's differential risk of discharge to a skilled nursing facility versus home. Overall accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were calculated after obtaining risk scores.

Results: Score cutoff equally maximizing sensitivity and specificity was 0.23, and the proportion of correct classifications by the predictive tool in this study population was found to be 0.723, with an area under the curve of 0.788 - both higher than previously published accuracy levels. With the threshold of 0.23, sensitivity and specificity were found to be 0.720 and 0.723, respectively.

Conclusions: The risk calculator showed very good accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in predicting discharge location for rural patients undergoing TKA and THA, with accuracy even higher than in urban populations. The model provides an easy-to-use interface, with automation representing a viable tool in helping with shared decision-making regarding postoperative discharge plans.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arthroplasty
Journal of Arthroplasty 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
734
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信