急性心肌梗死主动脉内球囊泵的容积-收入关系。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Circulation Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-25 Epub Date: 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1253/circj.CJ-24-0286
Yuichi Saito, Kazuya Tateishi, Masato Kanda, Yuki Shiko, Yohei Kawasaki, Yoshio Kobayashi, Takahiro Inoue
{"title":"急性心肌梗死主动脉内球囊泵的容积-收入关系。","authors":"Yuichi Saito, Kazuya Tateishi, Masato Kanda, Yuki Shiko, Yohei Kawasaki, Yoshio Kobayashi, Takahiro Inoue","doi":"10.1253/circj.CJ-24-0286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a major scenario for the use of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), particularly when complicated by cardiogenic shock, although the utilization of mechanical circulatory support devices varies widely per hospital. We evaluated the relationship, at the hospital level, between the volume of IABP use and mortality in AMI.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Using a Japanese nationwide administrative database, 26,490 patients with AMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from 154 hospitals were included in this study. The primary endpoint was the observed-to-predicted in-hospital mortality ratio. Predicted mortality per patient was calculated using baseline variables and averaged for each hospital. The associations among PCI volume for AMI, observed and predicted in-hospital mortality, and observed and predicted IABP use were assessed per hospital. Of 26,490 patients, 2,959 (11.2%) were treated with IABP and 1,283 (4.8%) died during hospitalization. The annualized number of uses of IABP per hospital in AMI was 4.5. In lower-volume primary PCI centers, IABP was more likely to be underused than expected, and the observed-to-predicted in-hospital mortality ratio was higher than in higher-volume centers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A lower annual number of IABP use was associated with an increased mortality risk at the hospital level, suggesting that IABP use can be an institutional quality indicator in the setting of AMI.</p>","PeriodicalId":50691,"journal":{"name":"Circulation Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Volume-Outcome Relationships for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Acute Myocardial Infarction.\",\"authors\":\"Yuichi Saito, Kazuya Tateishi, Masato Kanda, Yuki Shiko, Yohei Kawasaki, Yoshio Kobayashi, Takahiro Inoue\",\"doi\":\"10.1253/circj.CJ-24-0286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a major scenario for the use of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), particularly when complicated by cardiogenic shock, although the utilization of mechanical circulatory support devices varies widely per hospital. We evaluated the relationship, at the hospital level, between the volume of IABP use and mortality in AMI.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Using a Japanese nationwide administrative database, 26,490 patients with AMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from 154 hospitals were included in this study. The primary endpoint was the observed-to-predicted in-hospital mortality ratio. Predicted mortality per patient was calculated using baseline variables and averaged for each hospital. The associations among PCI volume for AMI, observed and predicted in-hospital mortality, and observed and predicted IABP use were assessed per hospital. Of 26,490 patients, 2,959 (11.2%) were treated with IABP and 1,283 (4.8%) died during hospitalization. The annualized number of uses of IABP per hospital in AMI was 4.5. In lower-volume primary PCI centers, IABP was more likely to be underused than expected, and the observed-to-predicted in-hospital mortality ratio was higher than in higher-volume centers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A lower annual number of IABP use was associated with an increased mortality risk at the hospital level, suggesting that IABP use can be an institutional quality indicator in the setting of AMI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-24-0286\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-24-0286","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急性心肌梗死(AMI)是使用主动脉内球囊反搏泵(IABP)的主要情况,尤其是在并发心源性休克的情况下,尽管每家医院使用机械循环支持设备的情况大不相同。我们在医院层面评估了 IABP 使用量与急性心肌梗死死亡率之间的关系:本研究利用日本全国性行政数据库,纳入了 154 家医院的 26,490 名接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的急性心肌梗死患者。主要终点是观察到的院内死亡率与预测的院内死亡率之比。根据基线变量计算出每位患者的预测死亡率,并为每家医院取平均值。对每家医院的急性心肌梗死PCI治疗量、观察到的和预测的院内死亡率、观察到的和预测的IABP使用率之间的关系进行了评估。在 26,490 名患者中,2,959 人(11.2%)接受了 IABP 治疗,1,283 人(4.8%)在住院期间死亡。在急性心肌梗死患者中,每家医院每年使用 IABP 的次数为 4.5 次。在手术量较少的初级PCI中心,IABP使用不足的可能性高于预期,观察到的院内死亡率与预测的院内死亡率之比高于手术量较多的中心:结论:IABP的年使用次数越少,医院的死亡率风险越高,这表明IABP的使用可以作为急性心肌梗死时的一项机构质量指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Volume-Outcome Relationships for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Background: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a major scenario for the use of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), particularly when complicated by cardiogenic shock, although the utilization of mechanical circulatory support devices varies widely per hospital. We evaluated the relationship, at the hospital level, between the volume of IABP use and mortality in AMI.

Methods and results: Using a Japanese nationwide administrative database, 26,490 patients with AMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from 154 hospitals were included in this study. The primary endpoint was the observed-to-predicted in-hospital mortality ratio. Predicted mortality per patient was calculated using baseline variables and averaged for each hospital. The associations among PCI volume for AMI, observed and predicted in-hospital mortality, and observed and predicted IABP use were assessed per hospital. Of 26,490 patients, 2,959 (11.2%) were treated with IABP and 1,283 (4.8%) died during hospitalization. The annualized number of uses of IABP per hospital in AMI was 4.5. In lower-volume primary PCI centers, IABP was more likely to be underused than expected, and the observed-to-predicted in-hospital mortality ratio was higher than in higher-volume centers.

Conclusions: A lower annual number of IABP use was associated with an increased mortality risk at the hospital level, suggesting that IABP use can be an institutional quality indicator in the setting of AMI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Circulation Journal
Circulation Journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
471
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Circulation publishes original research manuscripts, review articles, and other content related to cardiovascular health and disease, including observational studies, clinical trials, epidemiology, health services and outcomes studies, and advances in basic and translational research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信