使用平衡电解质溶液进行液体复苏比使用 0.9% 生理盐水更快缓解成人糖尿病酮症酸中毒 - 系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Gergő Vilmos Szabó, Csenge Szigetváry, Caner Turan, Marie Anne Engh, Tamás Terebessy, Alíz Fazekas, Nelli Farkas, Péter Hegyi, Zsolt Molnár
{"title":"使用平衡电解质溶液进行液体复苏比使用 0.9% 生理盐水更快缓解成人糖尿病酮症酸中毒 - 系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Gergő Vilmos Szabó,&nbsp;Csenge Szigetváry,&nbsp;Caner Turan,&nbsp;Marie Anne Engh,&nbsp;Tamás Terebessy,&nbsp;Alíz Fazekas,&nbsp;Nelli Farkas,&nbsp;Péter Hegyi,&nbsp;Zsolt Molnár","doi":"10.1002/dmrr.3831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Fluid resuscitation during diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is most frequently performed with 0.9% saline despite its high chloride and sodium concentration. Balanced Electrolyte Solutions (BES) may prove a more physiological alternative, but convincing evidence is missing. We aimed to compare the efficacy of 0.9% saline to BES in DKA management. MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were searched for relevant studies using predefined keywords (from inception to 27 November 2021). Relevant studies were those in which 0.9% saline (Saline-group) was compared to BES (BES-group) in adults admitted with DKA. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. The primary outcome was time to DKA resolution (defined by each study individually), while the main secondary outcomes were changes in laboratory values, duration of insulin infusion, and mortality. We included seven randomized controlled trials and three observational studies with 1006 participants. The primary outcome was reported for 316 patients, and we found that BES resolves DKA faster than 0.9% saline with a mean difference (MD) of −5.36 [95% CI: −10.46, −0.26] hours. Post-resuscitation chloride (MD: −4.26 [−6.97, −1.54] mmoL/L) and sodium (MD: −1.38 [−2.14, −0.62] mmoL/L) levels were significantly lower. In contrast, levels of post-resuscitation bicarbonate (MD: 1.82 [0.75, 2.89] mmoL/L) were significantly elevated in the BES-group compared to the Saline-group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding the duration of parenteral insulin administration (MD: 0.16 [−3.03, 3.35] hours) or mortality (OR: −0.67 [0.12, 3.68]). Studies showed some concern or a high risk of bias, and the level of evidence for most outcomes was low. This meta-analysis indicates that the use of BES resolves DKA faster than 0.9% saline. Therefore, DKA guidelines should consider BES instead of 0.9% saline as the first choice during fluid resuscitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11335,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews","volume":"40 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dmrr.3831","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fluid resuscitation with balanced electrolyte solutions results in faster resolution of diabetic ketoacidosis than with 0.9% saline in adults – A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Gergő Vilmos Szabó,&nbsp;Csenge Szigetváry,&nbsp;Caner Turan,&nbsp;Marie Anne Engh,&nbsp;Tamás Terebessy,&nbsp;Alíz Fazekas,&nbsp;Nelli Farkas,&nbsp;Péter Hegyi,&nbsp;Zsolt Molnár\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dmrr.3831\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Fluid resuscitation during diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is most frequently performed with 0.9% saline despite its high chloride and sodium concentration. Balanced Electrolyte Solutions (BES) may prove a more physiological alternative, but convincing evidence is missing. We aimed to compare the efficacy of 0.9% saline to BES in DKA management. MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were searched for relevant studies using predefined keywords (from inception to 27 November 2021). Relevant studies were those in which 0.9% saline (Saline-group) was compared to BES (BES-group) in adults admitted with DKA. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. The primary outcome was time to DKA resolution (defined by each study individually), while the main secondary outcomes were changes in laboratory values, duration of insulin infusion, and mortality. We included seven randomized controlled trials and three observational studies with 1006 participants. The primary outcome was reported for 316 patients, and we found that BES resolves DKA faster than 0.9% saline with a mean difference (MD) of −5.36 [95% CI: −10.46, −0.26] hours. Post-resuscitation chloride (MD: −4.26 [−6.97, −1.54] mmoL/L) and sodium (MD: −1.38 [−2.14, −0.62] mmoL/L) levels were significantly lower. In contrast, levels of post-resuscitation bicarbonate (MD: 1.82 [0.75, 2.89] mmoL/L) were significantly elevated in the BES-group compared to the Saline-group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding the duration of parenteral insulin administration (MD: 0.16 [−3.03, 3.35] hours) or mortality (OR: −0.67 [0.12, 3.68]). Studies showed some concern or a high risk of bias, and the level of evidence for most outcomes was low. This meta-analysis indicates that the use of BES resolves DKA faster than 0.9% saline. Therefore, DKA guidelines should consider BES instead of 0.9% saline as the first choice during fluid resuscitation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews\",\"volume\":\"40 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dmrr.3831\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dmrr.3831\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dmrr.3831","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)期间的液体复苏最常用的是 0.9% 生理盐水,尽管其氯化物和钠的浓度很高。平衡电解质溶液(BES)可能是一种更符合生理学原理的替代品,但目前还缺乏令人信服的证据。我们旨在比较 0.9% 生理盐水和 BES 在 DKA 治疗中的疗效。我们使用预定义的关键词在 MEDLINE、Cochrane Library 和 Embase 数据库中检索了相关研究(从开始到 2021 年 11 月 27 日)。相关研究是指在成人 DKA 患者中将 0.9% 生理盐水(生理盐水组)与 BES(BES 组)进行比较的研究。两名审稿人独立提取数据并评估偏倚风险。主要结果是DKA缓解时间(由每项研究单独定义),主要次要结果是实验室值变化、胰岛素输注持续时间和死亡率。我们纳入了 7 项随机对照试验和 3 项观察性研究,共有 1006 名参与者。我们发现 BES 比 0.9% 生理盐水能更快地缓解 DKA,平均差(MD)为-5.36 [95% CI:-10.46, -0.26]小时。复苏后氯化物(MD:-4.26 [-6.97, -1.54] mmoL/L)和钠(MD:-1.38 [-2.14, -0.62]mmoL/L)水平显著降低。相比之下,BES 组复苏后的碳酸氢盐水平(MD:1.82 [0.75, 2.89] mmoL/L)明显高于盐水组。在肠外胰岛素用药时间(MD:0.16 [-3.03, 3.35]小时)或死亡率(OR:-0.67 [0.12, 3.68])方面,组间差异无统计学意义。这些研究存在一定或较高的偏倚风险,大多数结果的证据水平较低。这项荟萃分析表明,与 0.9% 生理盐水相比,使用 BES 能更快地缓解 DKA。因此,DKA 指南应将 BES 而不是 0.9% 生理盐水作为液体复苏的首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Fluid resuscitation with balanced electrolyte solutions results in faster resolution of diabetic ketoacidosis than with 0.9% saline in adults – A systematic review and meta-analysis

Fluid resuscitation with balanced electrolyte solutions results in faster resolution of diabetic ketoacidosis than with 0.9% saline in adults – A systematic review and meta-analysis

Fluid resuscitation during diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is most frequently performed with 0.9% saline despite its high chloride and sodium concentration. Balanced Electrolyte Solutions (BES) may prove a more physiological alternative, but convincing evidence is missing. We aimed to compare the efficacy of 0.9% saline to BES in DKA management. MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were searched for relevant studies using predefined keywords (from inception to 27 November 2021). Relevant studies were those in which 0.9% saline (Saline-group) was compared to BES (BES-group) in adults admitted with DKA. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. The primary outcome was time to DKA resolution (defined by each study individually), while the main secondary outcomes were changes in laboratory values, duration of insulin infusion, and mortality. We included seven randomized controlled trials and three observational studies with 1006 participants. The primary outcome was reported for 316 patients, and we found that BES resolves DKA faster than 0.9% saline with a mean difference (MD) of −5.36 [95% CI: −10.46, −0.26] hours. Post-resuscitation chloride (MD: −4.26 [−6.97, −1.54] mmoL/L) and sodium (MD: −1.38 [−2.14, −0.62] mmoL/L) levels were significantly lower. In contrast, levels of post-resuscitation bicarbonate (MD: 1.82 [0.75, 2.89] mmoL/L) were significantly elevated in the BES-group compared to the Saline-group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding the duration of parenteral insulin administration (MD: 0.16 [−3.03, 3.35] hours) or mortality (OR: −0.67 [0.12, 3.68]). Studies showed some concern or a high risk of bias, and the level of evidence for most outcomes was low. This meta-analysis indicates that the use of BES resolves DKA faster than 0.9% saline. Therefore, DKA guidelines should consider BES instead of 0.9% saline as the first choice during fluid resuscitation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews
Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
17.20
自引率
2.50%
发文量
84
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews is a premier endocrinology and metabolism journal esteemed by clinicians and researchers alike. Encompassing a wide spectrum of topics including diabetes, endocrinology, metabolism, and obesity, the journal eagerly accepts submissions ranging from clinical studies to basic and translational research, as well as reviews exploring historical progress, controversial issues, and prominent opinions in the field. Join us in advancing knowledge and understanding in the realm of diabetes and metabolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信