胃肠化生:澳大利亚一家大型中心的发病率和全国内镜实践调查。

IF 1.7 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
JGH Open Pub Date : 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1002/jgh3.13115
Imogen Hartley, Declan Connoley, Nikhita Sane, Ryan Hirsch, Dilini Abeywickrama, Nicholle Sim, Vinny Ea, Robert Azzopardi, Ian Simpson, Sally Bell, Simon Hew
{"title":"胃肠化生:澳大利亚一家大型中心的发病率和全国内镜实践调查。","authors":"Imogen Hartley,&nbsp;Declan Connoley,&nbsp;Nikhita Sane,&nbsp;Ryan Hirsch,&nbsp;Dilini Abeywickrama,&nbsp;Nicholle Sim,&nbsp;Vinny Ea,&nbsp;Robert Azzopardi,&nbsp;Ian Simpson,&nbsp;Sally Bell,&nbsp;Simon Hew","doi":"10.1002/jgh3.13115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Atrophic gastritis (AG) and gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) are early changes in the stepwise progression to gastric adenocarcinoma. There is heterogeneity in international guidelines regarding the endoscopic diagnosis and surveillance of AG and GIM. This study aims to determine the prevalence of GIM in an Australian center and assess the approach of Australian endoscopists for these two conditions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a single-center retrospective study of adult patients between January 2015 and December 2020 diagnosed with GIM on gastric biopsy following upper gastric endoscopy. A web-based, 25-question, investigator-designed, multiple-choice survey was distributed among all registered endoscopists in Australia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The overall prevalence of GIM within a single Australian center was 11.7% over 5 years. Of the 1026 patients identified, only 58.7% underwent mapping biopsies using the modified Sydney protocol. Among the cohort, 1.6% had low-grade dysplasia, 0.9% had high-grade dysplasia, and 1.8% had malignancy on initial gastroscopy. Two hundred and sixty-seven (7.2%) endoscopists completed the survey, 44.2% indicated they would perform mapping for all patients, and 36% only for high-risk patients. Only 1.5% (<i>n</i> = 4) of respondents were able to correctly identify all six endoscopic photos of GIM/AG.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study demonstrates that in a large tertiary center, GIM is a prevalent endoscopic finding, but the associated rates of dysplasia and cancer were low. Additionally, among a small proportion of surveyed Australian endoscopists, there is notable variability in the endoscopic approach for AG and GIM and significant knowledge gaps. More training is required to increase the recognition of GIM and compliance with histological mapping.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":45861,"journal":{"name":"JGH Open","volume":"8 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11199814/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gastric intestinal metaplasia: Prevalence in a large Australian center and nationwide survey of endoscopic practice\",\"authors\":\"Imogen Hartley,&nbsp;Declan Connoley,&nbsp;Nikhita Sane,&nbsp;Ryan Hirsch,&nbsp;Dilini Abeywickrama,&nbsp;Nicholle Sim,&nbsp;Vinny Ea,&nbsp;Robert Azzopardi,&nbsp;Ian Simpson,&nbsp;Sally Bell,&nbsp;Simon Hew\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jgh3.13115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Atrophic gastritis (AG) and gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) are early changes in the stepwise progression to gastric adenocarcinoma. There is heterogeneity in international guidelines regarding the endoscopic diagnosis and surveillance of AG and GIM. This study aims to determine the prevalence of GIM in an Australian center and assess the approach of Australian endoscopists for these two conditions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted a single-center retrospective study of adult patients between January 2015 and December 2020 diagnosed with GIM on gastric biopsy following upper gastric endoscopy. A web-based, 25-question, investigator-designed, multiple-choice survey was distributed among all registered endoscopists in Australia.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The overall prevalence of GIM within a single Australian center was 11.7% over 5 years. Of the 1026 patients identified, only 58.7% underwent mapping biopsies using the modified Sydney protocol. Among the cohort, 1.6% had low-grade dysplasia, 0.9% had high-grade dysplasia, and 1.8% had malignancy on initial gastroscopy. Two hundred and sixty-seven (7.2%) endoscopists completed the survey, 44.2% indicated they would perform mapping for all patients, and 36% only for high-risk patients. Only 1.5% (<i>n</i> = 4) of respondents were able to correctly identify all six endoscopic photos of GIM/AG.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study demonstrates that in a large tertiary center, GIM is a prevalent endoscopic finding, but the associated rates of dysplasia and cancer were low. Additionally, among a small proportion of surveyed Australian endoscopists, there is notable variability in the endoscopic approach for AG and GIM and significant knowledge gaps. More training is required to increase the recognition of GIM and compliance with histological mapping.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JGH Open\",\"volume\":\"8 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11199814/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JGH Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgh3.13115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JGH Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgh3.13115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:萎缩性胃炎(AG)和胃肠化生(GIM)是胃腺癌逐步发展过程中的早期变化。国际指南对 AG 和 GIM 的内镜诊断和监测存在差异。本研究旨在确定 GIM 在澳大利亚一个中心的发病率,并评估澳大利亚内镜医师对这两种情况的处理方法:我们对 2015 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月间上消化道内镜检查后经胃活检确诊为 GIM 的成年患者进行了单中心回顾性研究。我们向澳大利亚所有注册内镜医师发放了一份由研究人员设计的基于网络的25道选择题调查问卷:结果:在澳大利亚的一个中心,5 年内 GIM 的总发病率为 11.7%。在已确认的 1026 名患者中,只有 58.7% 的患者使用修改后的悉尼方案进行了映射活检。在这些患者中,1.6%患有低度发育不良,0.9%患有高度发育不良,1.8%在初次胃镜检查时患有恶性肿瘤。267名内镜医师(7.2%)完成了调查,44.2%的内镜医师表示会对所有患者进行造影,36%的内镜医师只对高风险患者进行造影。只有 1.5%(n = 4)的受访者能够正确识别 GIM/AG 的所有六张内窥镜照片:这项研究表明,在一个大型三级医疗中心,GIM 是一种常见的内镜检查结果,但相关的发育不良和癌症发生率却很低。此外,在接受调查的一小部分澳大利亚内镜医师中,AG 和 GIM 的内镜检查方法存在明显差异,知识差距也很大。需要进行更多的培训,以提高对 GIM 的识别率和对组织学图谱的依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Gastric intestinal metaplasia: Prevalence in a large Australian center and nationwide survey of endoscopic practice

Gastric intestinal metaplasia: Prevalence in a large Australian center and nationwide survey of endoscopic practice

Background and Aim

Atrophic gastritis (AG) and gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) are early changes in the stepwise progression to gastric adenocarcinoma. There is heterogeneity in international guidelines regarding the endoscopic diagnosis and surveillance of AG and GIM. This study aims to determine the prevalence of GIM in an Australian center and assess the approach of Australian endoscopists for these two conditions.

Methods

We conducted a single-center retrospective study of adult patients between January 2015 and December 2020 diagnosed with GIM on gastric biopsy following upper gastric endoscopy. A web-based, 25-question, investigator-designed, multiple-choice survey was distributed among all registered endoscopists in Australia.

Results

The overall prevalence of GIM within a single Australian center was 11.7% over 5 years. Of the 1026 patients identified, only 58.7% underwent mapping biopsies using the modified Sydney protocol. Among the cohort, 1.6% had low-grade dysplasia, 0.9% had high-grade dysplasia, and 1.8% had malignancy on initial gastroscopy. Two hundred and sixty-seven (7.2%) endoscopists completed the survey, 44.2% indicated they would perform mapping for all patients, and 36% only for high-risk patients. Only 1.5% (n = 4) of respondents were able to correctly identify all six endoscopic photos of GIM/AG.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that in a large tertiary center, GIM is a prevalent endoscopic finding, but the associated rates of dysplasia and cancer were low. Additionally, among a small proportion of surveyed Australian endoscopists, there is notable variability in the endoscopic approach for AG and GIM and significant knowledge gaps. More training is required to increase the recognition of GIM and compliance with histological mapping.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JGH Open
JGH Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信