使用 Keratograph Oculus 3 进行无创破裂时间测量的重复性。

Q4 Medicine
Lenka Musilová, Alena Vodičková, František Pluháček
{"title":"使用 Keratograph Oculus 3 进行无创破裂时间测量的重复性。","authors":"Lenka Musilová, Alena Vodičková, František Pluháček","doi":"10.31348/2024/26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the repeatability of noninvasive break-up time (NIBUT) measurement by keratograph when it is determined from one, two or three partial measurements, and to recommend a suitable methodology for practice. Another goal is to verify that repeated measurements do not affect the measured value.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Thirty-eight healthy volunteers (30 women and 8 men) aged between 19 and 50 years old were included in the study, in which only one eye of each volunteer was measured. The study was designed as a prospective one. Each subject adapted to the local conditions of the laboratory for 15 minutes and subsequently underwent two series of NIBUT measurements (test, retest) on an OCULUS 3 Keratograph. The minimum time interval between the two series was 10 minutes, in which each series contained three partial measurements approximately 3 three measurements in the given series. Repeatability was assessed by a Bland-Altman analysis and expressed as a repeatability coefficient. In every case, only the time of the first break-up of the tear film was monitored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The statistical analysis did not show statistically significant differences both between partial measurements of NIBUT in the individual series (p = 0.92, p = 0.81) and when comparing all six measurements (p = 0.95). The mean values of the partial measurements ranged from 13.6 s to 14.4 s. The repeatability coefficients were found to be 15.0 s, 12.1 s and 10.0 s for methodologies A, B and C, respectively. A supplementary analysis for 12 eyes with low NIBUT (&lt; 10 s) showed statistically significantly better repeatability in this group, with coefficients of 7.0 s (methodology A), 6.0 s (B) and 4.6 s (C).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Determination of NIBUT from three consecutive measurements (with a sufficient interval of ideally a few minutes) significantly improves repeatability. Such repeated NIBUT measurements do not have a significant effect on the measured value. The mentioned methodology for measuring NIBUT on a keratograph can be recommended for use in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":39839,"journal":{"name":"Ceska a Slovenska Oftalmologie","volume":"80 Ahead of print","pages":"266-270"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repeatability of Noninvasive Break-Up Time Measurements using Keratograph Oculus 3.\",\"authors\":\"Lenka Musilová, Alena Vodičková, František Pluháček\",\"doi\":\"10.31348/2024/26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the repeatability of noninvasive break-up time (NIBUT) measurement by keratograph when it is determined from one, two or three partial measurements, and to recommend a suitable methodology for practice. Another goal is to verify that repeated measurements do not affect the measured value.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Thirty-eight healthy volunteers (30 women and 8 men) aged between 19 and 50 years old were included in the study, in which only one eye of each volunteer was measured. The study was designed as a prospective one. Each subject adapted to the local conditions of the laboratory for 15 minutes and subsequently underwent two series of NIBUT measurements (test, retest) on an OCULUS 3 Keratograph. The minimum time interval between the two series was 10 minutes, in which each series contained three partial measurements approximately 3 three measurements in the given series. Repeatability was assessed by a Bland-Altman analysis and expressed as a repeatability coefficient. In every case, only the time of the first break-up of the tear film was monitored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The statistical analysis did not show statistically significant differences both between partial measurements of NIBUT in the individual series (p = 0.92, p = 0.81) and when comparing all six measurements (p = 0.95). The mean values of the partial measurements ranged from 13.6 s to 14.4 s. The repeatability coefficients were found to be 15.0 s, 12.1 s and 10.0 s for methodologies A, B and C, respectively. A supplementary analysis for 12 eyes with low NIBUT (&lt; 10 s) showed statistically significantly better repeatability in this group, with coefficients of 7.0 s (methodology A), 6.0 s (B) and 4.6 s (C).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Determination of NIBUT from three consecutive measurements (with a sufficient interval of ideally a few minutes) significantly improves repeatability. Such repeated NIBUT measurements do not have a significant effect on the measured value. The mentioned methodology for measuring NIBUT on a keratograph can be recommended for use in practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ceska a Slovenska Oftalmologie\",\"volume\":\"80 Ahead of print\",\"pages\":\"266-270\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ceska a Slovenska Oftalmologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31348/2024/26\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ceska a Slovenska Oftalmologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31348/2024/26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的主要目的是评估角膜塑形镜测量无创破裂时间(NIBUT)的重复性,即通过一次、两次或三次局部测量确定的重复性,并为实践推荐合适的方法。另一个目标是验证重复测量不会影响测量值:研究对象包括 38 名健康志愿者(30 名女性和 8 名男性),年龄在 19 岁至 50 岁之间,其中只测量了每名志愿者的一只眼睛。该研究为前瞻性研究。每位受试者在实验室适应当地条件 15 分钟,然后在 OCULUS 3 角膜塑形镜上进行两组 NIBUT 测量(测试、复测)。两个系列之间的最小时间间隔为 10 分钟,其中每个系列包含三次局部测量,每次测量约为给定系列中的三次测量。重复性通过布兰-阿尔特曼分析进行评估,并以重复性系数表示。在每种情况下,只监测泪膜第一次破裂的时间:统计分析结果表明,在单个系列的 NIBUT 部分测量值之间(p = 0.92,p = 0.81)以及在比较所有六次测量值时(p = 0.95),均无显著统计学差异。方法 A、B 和 C 的重复性系数分别为 15.0 秒、12.1 秒和 10.0 秒。对 12 只 NIBUT 值低(< 10 秒)的眼睛进行的补充分析表明,这组眼睛的重复性在统计学上明显更好,系数分别为 7.0 秒(方法 A)、6.0 秒(B)和 4.6 秒(C):结论:通过三次连续测量(间隔时间最好为几分钟)确定 NIBUT 可显著提高重复性。这种重复的 NIBUT 测量对测量值没有明显影响。上述在角膜塑形镜上测量 NIBUT 的方法可推荐在实践中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Repeatability of Noninvasive Break-Up Time Measurements using Keratograph Oculus 3.

Aim: The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the repeatability of noninvasive break-up time (NIBUT) measurement by keratograph when it is determined from one, two or three partial measurements, and to recommend a suitable methodology for practice. Another goal is to verify that repeated measurements do not affect the measured value.

Material and methods: Thirty-eight healthy volunteers (30 women and 8 men) aged between 19 and 50 years old were included in the study, in which only one eye of each volunteer was measured. The study was designed as a prospective one. Each subject adapted to the local conditions of the laboratory for 15 minutes and subsequently underwent two series of NIBUT measurements (test, retest) on an OCULUS 3 Keratograph. The minimum time interval between the two series was 10 minutes, in which each series contained three partial measurements approximately 3 three measurements in the given series. Repeatability was assessed by a Bland-Altman analysis and expressed as a repeatability coefficient. In every case, only the time of the first break-up of the tear film was monitored.

Results: The statistical analysis did not show statistically significant differences both between partial measurements of NIBUT in the individual series (p = 0.92, p = 0.81) and when comparing all six measurements (p = 0.95). The mean values of the partial measurements ranged from 13.6 s to 14.4 s. The repeatability coefficients were found to be 15.0 s, 12.1 s and 10.0 s for methodologies A, B and C, respectively. A supplementary analysis for 12 eyes with low NIBUT (< 10 s) showed statistically significantly better repeatability in this group, with coefficients of 7.0 s (methodology A), 6.0 s (B) and 4.6 s (C).

Conclusion: Determination of NIBUT from three consecutive measurements (with a sufficient interval of ideally a few minutes) significantly improves repeatability. Such repeated NIBUT measurements do not have a significant effect on the measured value. The mentioned methodology for measuring NIBUT on a keratograph can be recommended for use in practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ceska a Slovenska Oftalmologie
Ceska a Slovenska Oftalmologie Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: - Redakce přijímá pouze práce vyhovující po odborné stránce, které jsou na odpovídající profesionální a formální úrovni. - Uveřejněná práce se stává majetkem časopisu, přetisknout její část nebo obrázek lze jen s citací původu. - Rukopis zasílejte v originále a dobře čitelné kopii (je nutná také kopie tabulek, legend, podle možnosti i obrázků). - Listy číslujte v pravém horním rohu a spojujte svorkou, nesešívejte. Přijímáme práce psané na jedné straně kvalitního bílého nelesklého papíru formátu A4 (neprůklepový) na psacím stroji nebo počítači s obvyklými typy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信