在一个真实世界队列中,使用免疫疗法的小细胞肺癌女性患者实现了长期生存。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Thoracic Cancer Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1111/1759-7714.15393
Yuling He, Lingdong Kong, Xumeng Ji, Minglei Zhuo, Tongtong An, Bo Jia, Yujia Chi, Jingjing Wang, Jun Zhao, Jianjie Li, Xue Yang, Hanxiao Chen, Xiaoyu Zhai, Yidi Tai, Lu Ding, Ziping Wang, Yuyan Wang
{"title":"在一个真实世界队列中,使用免疫疗法的小细胞肺癌女性患者实现了长期生存。","authors":"Yuling He, Lingdong Kong, Xumeng Ji, Minglei Zhuo, Tongtong An, Bo Jia, Yujia Chi, Jingjing Wang, Jun Zhao, Jianjie Li, Xue Yang, Hanxiao Chen, Xiaoyu Zhai, Yidi Tai, Lu Ding, Ziping Wang, Yuyan Wang","doi":"10.1111/1759-7714.15393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Usage of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has prolonged the overall survival (OS) of patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). In clinical trials, males accounted for a large proportion, leading to the uncertainty of its efficacy in female patients. We therefore conducted this study to explore the efficacy and safety of using ICIs in female patients with ES-SCLC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively enrolled female SCLC patients and subdivided them into two groups. Group A (n = 40) was defined as ES-SCLC patients who received first-line standard chemotherapy with or without ICIs. Group B (n = 47) included relapsed SCLC patients who were administered with second-line therapies. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to calculate survival analysis. Chi-squared tests were used to analyze the incidence of adverse events (AEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median progression-free survival (PFS) and median OS favored the ICI-contained cohorts (Group A PFS: 8.3 vs. 6.1 months; OS: not reached vs. 11.3 months; Group B PFS: 15.1 vs. 3.3 months; OS: 35.3 vs. 8.3 months), especially in those patients who received second-line immunotherapies. Patients who received immunotherapy had a slightly higher incidence rate of grade ≥3 AEs (Group A: 71.4% vs. 46.2%; Group B: 44.5% vs. 13.2%). Those who developed grade ≥3 AEs in first-line ICIs cohort had a more favorable survival (PFS: 8.3 vs. 3.2 months; OS: not reached vs. 5.1 months).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggested that female ES-SCLC patients treated with immunotherapy tended to achieve a relatively longer survival. The incidence of AEs (grade ≥3) was higher in women patients receiving ICIs, which requires monitoring more closely.</p>","PeriodicalId":23338,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11320081/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Women patients with small-cell lung cancer using immunotherapy in a real-world cohort achieved long-term survival.\",\"authors\":\"Yuling He, Lingdong Kong, Xumeng Ji, Minglei Zhuo, Tongtong An, Bo Jia, Yujia Chi, Jingjing Wang, Jun Zhao, Jianjie Li, Xue Yang, Hanxiao Chen, Xiaoyu Zhai, Yidi Tai, Lu Ding, Ziping Wang, Yuyan Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1759-7714.15393\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Usage of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has prolonged the overall survival (OS) of patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). In clinical trials, males accounted for a large proportion, leading to the uncertainty of its efficacy in female patients. We therefore conducted this study to explore the efficacy and safety of using ICIs in female patients with ES-SCLC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively enrolled female SCLC patients and subdivided them into two groups. Group A (n = 40) was defined as ES-SCLC patients who received first-line standard chemotherapy with or without ICIs. Group B (n = 47) included relapsed SCLC patients who were administered with second-line therapies. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to calculate survival analysis. Chi-squared tests were used to analyze the incidence of adverse events (AEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median progression-free survival (PFS) and median OS favored the ICI-contained cohorts (Group A PFS: 8.3 vs. 6.1 months; OS: not reached vs. 11.3 months; Group B PFS: 15.1 vs. 3.3 months; OS: 35.3 vs. 8.3 months), especially in those patients who received second-line immunotherapies. Patients who received immunotherapy had a slightly higher incidence rate of grade ≥3 AEs (Group A: 71.4% vs. 46.2%; Group B: 44.5% vs. 13.2%). Those who developed grade ≥3 AEs in first-line ICIs cohort had a more favorable survival (PFS: 8.3 vs. 3.2 months; OS: not reached vs. 5.1 months).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggested that female ES-SCLC patients treated with immunotherapy tended to achieve a relatively longer survival. The incidence of AEs (grade ≥3) was higher in women patients receiving ICIs, which requires monitoring more closely.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thoracic Cancer\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11320081/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thoracic Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.15393\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.15393","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的使用延长了广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)患者的总生存期(OS)。在临床试验中,男性占了很大比例,这导致其对女性患者疗效的不确定性。因此,我们开展了这项研究,探讨女性 ES-SCLC 患者使用 ICIs 的疗效和安全性:我们回顾性地招募了女性 SCLC 患者,并将她们分为两组。A组(n = 40)定义为接受一线标准化疗并使用或不使用ICIs的ES-SCLC患者。B组(n = 47)包括接受二线疗法的复发SCLC患者。采用卡普兰-梅耶法计算生存率分析。不良事件(AEs)发生率的分析采用卡方检验:结果:中位无进展生存期(PFS)和中位OS均优于含有ICI的组群(A组PFS:8.3个月 vs. 6.1个月;OS:未达到 vs. 11.3个月;B组PFS:15.1个月 vs. 3.3个月;OS:35.3个月 vs. 8.3个月):35.3个月 vs. 8.3个月),尤其是接受二线免疫疗法的患者。接受免疫疗法的患者发生≥3级AE的比例略高(A组:71.4%对46.2%;B组:44.5%对13.2%)。一线ICIs队列中发生≥3级AEs的患者生存期更长(PFS:8.3个月 vs. 3.2个月;OS:未达到 vs. 5.1个月):我们的研究表明,接受免疫疗法治疗的女性ES-SCLC患者的生存期相对较长。接受 ICIs 治疗的女性患者的 AEs(≥3 级)发生率较高,需要更密切地监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Women patients with small-cell lung cancer using immunotherapy in a real-world cohort achieved long-term survival.

Background: Usage of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has prolonged the overall survival (OS) of patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). In clinical trials, males accounted for a large proportion, leading to the uncertainty of its efficacy in female patients. We therefore conducted this study to explore the efficacy and safety of using ICIs in female patients with ES-SCLC.

Methods: We retrospectively enrolled female SCLC patients and subdivided them into two groups. Group A (n = 40) was defined as ES-SCLC patients who received first-line standard chemotherapy with or without ICIs. Group B (n = 47) included relapsed SCLC patients who were administered with second-line therapies. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to calculate survival analysis. Chi-squared tests were used to analyze the incidence of adverse events (AEs).

Results: Median progression-free survival (PFS) and median OS favored the ICI-contained cohorts (Group A PFS: 8.3 vs. 6.1 months; OS: not reached vs. 11.3 months; Group B PFS: 15.1 vs. 3.3 months; OS: 35.3 vs. 8.3 months), especially in those patients who received second-line immunotherapies. Patients who received immunotherapy had a slightly higher incidence rate of grade ≥3 AEs (Group A: 71.4% vs. 46.2%; Group B: 44.5% vs. 13.2%). Those who developed grade ≥3 AEs in first-line ICIs cohort had a more favorable survival (PFS: 8.3 vs. 3.2 months; OS: not reached vs. 5.1 months).

Conclusions: Our study suggested that female ES-SCLC patients treated with immunotherapy tended to achieve a relatively longer survival. The incidence of AEs (grade ≥3) was higher in women patients receiving ICIs, which requires monitoring more closely.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thoracic Cancer
Thoracic Cancer ONCOLOGY-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
439
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Thoracic Cancer aims to facilitate international collaboration and exchange of comprehensive and cutting-edge information on basic, translational, and applied clinical research in lung cancer, esophageal cancer, mediastinal cancer, breast cancer and other thoracic malignancies. Prevention, treatment and research relevant to Asia-Pacific is a focus area, but submissions from all regions are welcomed. The editors encourage contributions relevant to prevention, general thoracic surgery, medical oncology, radiology, radiation medicine, pathology, basic cancer research, as well as epidemiological and translational studies in thoracic cancer. Thoracic Cancer is the official publication of the Chinese Society of Lung Cancer, International Chinese Society of Thoracic Surgery and is endorsed by the Korean Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the Hong Kong Cancer Therapy Society. The Journal publishes a range of article types including: Editorials, Invited Reviews, Mini Reviews, Original Articles, Clinical Guidelines, Technological Notes, Imaging in thoracic cancer, Meeting Reports, Case Reports, Letters to the Editor, Commentaries, and Brief Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信