在囊性纤维化成人患者中验证综合姑息治疗结果量表(IPOS)。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric Pulmonology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1002/ppul.27143
Anna M Georgiopoulos, Stephanie DiFiglia, Elizabeth K Seng, Russell Portenoy, Nivedita Chaudhary, Ruobin Wei, Maria N Berdella, Deborah Friedman, Catherine Kier, Rachel W Linnemann, Brandi Middour-Oxler, Teresa Stables-Carney, Patricia Walker, Janice Wang, Lael M Yonker, Lara Dhingra
{"title":"在囊性纤维化成人患者中验证综合姑息治疗结果量表(IPOS)。","authors":"Anna M Georgiopoulos, Stephanie DiFiglia, Elizabeth K Seng, Russell Portenoy, Nivedita Chaudhary, Ruobin Wei, Maria N Berdella, Deborah Friedman, Catherine Kier, Rachel W Linnemann, Brandi Middour-Oxler, Teresa Stables-Carney, Patricia Walker, Janice Wang, Lael M Yonker, Lara Dhingra","doi":"10.1002/ppul.27143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A primary palliative care model for cystic fibrosis (CF) recommends using the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS) for screening. Validation of the IPOS is needed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This secondary analysis utilized baseline data from a multisite trial of the palliative care model, Improving Life with CF. Adults with CF completed the IPOS, the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale-CF (MSAS-CF), the CF Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R), the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7), and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). IPOS structure was assessed using Cronbach α coefficients and a factor analysis. Construct validity was evaluated through bivariate relationships between IPOS scores and other questionnaire scores, and linear regressions assessing the extent to which the IPOS explains variance in quality-of-life domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample comprised 256 adults with complete IPOS data. α coefficients were .86 for the IPOS total score, .81 for the Physical Symptoms subscale, .79 for the Emotional Symptoms subscale, and .63 for the Communication/Practical Issues subscale. A two-component factor structure best aligned with the current subscales. IPOS scores were significantly associated with other measures; associations with MSAS-CF and CFQ-R subscales differentiated the IPOS Physical and Emotional subscales. The IPOS total score provided unique information about the variance in the CFQ-R Physical Functioning and Respiratory Symptoms domain scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In adults with CF, the IPOS has acceptable internal consistency and there is evidence of construct validity. These findings support adoption of the IPOS in the primary palliative care model for CF.</p>","PeriodicalId":19932,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Pulmonology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS) in adults with cystic fibrosis.\",\"authors\":\"Anna M Georgiopoulos, Stephanie DiFiglia, Elizabeth K Seng, Russell Portenoy, Nivedita Chaudhary, Ruobin Wei, Maria N Berdella, Deborah Friedman, Catherine Kier, Rachel W Linnemann, Brandi Middour-Oxler, Teresa Stables-Carney, Patricia Walker, Janice Wang, Lael M Yonker, Lara Dhingra\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ppul.27143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A primary palliative care model for cystic fibrosis (CF) recommends using the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS) for screening. Validation of the IPOS is needed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This secondary analysis utilized baseline data from a multisite trial of the palliative care model, Improving Life with CF. Adults with CF completed the IPOS, the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale-CF (MSAS-CF), the CF Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R), the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7), and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). IPOS structure was assessed using Cronbach α coefficients and a factor analysis. Construct validity was evaluated through bivariate relationships between IPOS scores and other questionnaire scores, and linear regressions assessing the extent to which the IPOS explains variance in quality-of-life domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample comprised 256 adults with complete IPOS data. α coefficients were .86 for the IPOS total score, .81 for the Physical Symptoms subscale, .79 for the Emotional Symptoms subscale, and .63 for the Communication/Practical Issues subscale. A two-component factor structure best aligned with the current subscales. IPOS scores were significantly associated with other measures; associations with MSAS-CF and CFQ-R subscales differentiated the IPOS Physical and Emotional subscales. The IPOS total score provided unique information about the variance in the CFQ-R Physical Functioning and Respiratory Symptoms domain scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In adults with CF, the IPOS has acceptable internal consistency and there is evidence of construct validity. These findings support adoption of the IPOS in the primary palliative care model for CF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Pulmonology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Pulmonology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.27143\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.27143","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:一种针对囊性纤维化(CF)的初级姑息治疗模式建议使用综合姑息治疗结果量表(IPOS)进行筛查。需要对 IPOS 进行验证:这项二次分析利用了姑息治疗模式 "改善 CF 患者的生活 "多站点试验的基线数据。成年 CF 患者填写了 IPOS、纪念症状评估量表-CF (MSAS-CF)、CF 问卷-修订版 (CFQ-R)、患者健康问卷 (PHQ-8)、广泛性焦虑症 (GAD-7) 和感知压力量表 (PSS)。使用 Cronbach α 系数和因子分析评估了 IPOS 的结构。通过IPOS得分与其他问卷得分之间的双变量关系,以及评估IPOS对生活质量领域差异解释程度的线性回归,对结构有效性进行了评估:样本包括 256 名具有完整 IPOS 数据的成年人。IPOS 总分的 α 系数为 0.86,身体症状分量表的 α 系数为 0.81,情感症状分量表的 α 系数为 0.79,沟通/实际问题分量表的 α 系数为 0.63。双成分因子结构与当前的分量表最为吻合。IPOS得分与其他测量指标有明显关联;与MSAS-CF和CFQ-R分量表的关联区分了IPOS的身体和情感分量表。IPOS总分提供了有关CFQ-R身体功能和呼吸症状领域得分差异的独特信息:在成年 CF 患者中,IPOS 具有可接受的内部一致性,并有证据表明其具有构建效度。这些研究结果支持在CF的初级姑息治疗模式中采用IPOS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS) in adults with cystic fibrosis.

Background: A primary palliative care model for cystic fibrosis (CF) recommends using the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS) for screening. Validation of the IPOS is needed.

Methods: This secondary analysis utilized baseline data from a multisite trial of the palliative care model, Improving Life with CF. Adults with CF completed the IPOS, the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale-CF (MSAS-CF), the CF Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R), the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7), and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). IPOS structure was assessed using Cronbach α coefficients and a factor analysis. Construct validity was evaluated through bivariate relationships between IPOS scores and other questionnaire scores, and linear regressions assessing the extent to which the IPOS explains variance in quality-of-life domains.

Results: The sample comprised 256 adults with complete IPOS data. α coefficients were .86 for the IPOS total score, .81 for the Physical Symptoms subscale, .79 for the Emotional Symptoms subscale, and .63 for the Communication/Practical Issues subscale. A two-component factor structure best aligned with the current subscales. IPOS scores were significantly associated with other measures; associations with MSAS-CF and CFQ-R subscales differentiated the IPOS Physical and Emotional subscales. The IPOS total score provided unique information about the variance in the CFQ-R Physical Functioning and Respiratory Symptoms domain scores.

Conclusions: In adults with CF, the IPOS has acceptable internal consistency and there is evidence of construct validity. These findings support adoption of the IPOS in the primary palliative care model for CF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Pulmonology
Pediatric Pulmonology 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.90%
发文量
468
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Pulmonology (PPUL) is the foremost global journal studying the respiratory system in disease and in health as it develops from intrauterine life though adolescence to adulthood. Combining explicit and informative analysis of clinical as well as basic scientific research, PPUL provides a look at the many facets of respiratory system disorders in infants and children, ranging from pathological anatomy, developmental issues, and pathophysiology to infectious disease, asthma, cystic fibrosis, and airborne toxins. Focused attention is given to the reporting of diagnostic and therapeutic methods for neonates, preschool children, and adolescents, the enduring effects of childhood respiratory diseases, and newly described infectious diseases. PPUL concentrates on subject matters of crucial interest to specialists preparing for the Pediatric Subspecialty Examinations in the United States and other countries. With its attentive coverage and extensive clinical data, this journal is a principle source for pediatricians in practice and in training and a must have for all pediatric pulmonologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信