{"title":"对肛门黏液腺癌患者的发生、管理和预后进行基于人群和倾向得分匹配的调查。","authors":"Guorong Yao, Ziyang Zhou, Yiqi Wang, Yanting Jiang, Jili Wang, Senxiang Yan, Feng Zhao","doi":"10.1159/000539930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anal mucinous adenocarcinoma (AMAC) is an extremely rare form of anal cancer. Our objective was to examine the incidence, management, and prognostic factors of AMAC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed age-adjusted incidence (AAI) rates over time and compared the prognosis of AMAC with anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) and adenocarcinoma (AAC) using propensity score matching and Kaplan-Meier analysis. Patients were classified based on summary stage and treatments to determine cancer-specific survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AAI of AMAC fluctuated within a narrow range (0.082-0.237 per million person-years) from 2000 to 2018. AMAC had a slight non-significant trend of worse prognosis than ASCC (p = 0.348) and a better prognosis than AAC (p < 0.01). Females made up a larger proportion of patients diagnosed with the distant disease (p < 0.05) and unmarried (p < 0.05) and somewhat less probably to need surgical removal (p < 0.01) and radiotherapy (p < 0.01). Elderly patients have lower rates of survival (p < 0.05). Localized stage was associated with better prognosis (p < 0.05). Surgery was associated with a tendency toward better survival (p = 0.095).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AMAC exhibits a low incidence yet favorable prognosis compared to typical AAC and slightly worse compared to ASCC. Elderly age is associated with poorer prognosis, while localized stage indicates better prognosis. Surgery demonstrates a trend toward improved survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Population-Based and Propensity Score-Matched Investigation of the Occurrence, Management, and Prognosis of Anal Mucinous Adenocarcinoma Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Guorong Yao, Ziyang Zhou, Yiqi Wang, Yanting Jiang, Jili Wang, Senxiang Yan, Feng Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000539930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anal mucinous adenocarcinoma (AMAC) is an extremely rare form of anal cancer. Our objective was to examine the incidence, management, and prognostic factors of AMAC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed age-adjusted incidence (AAI) rates over time and compared the prognosis of AMAC with anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) and adenocarcinoma (AAC) using propensity score matching and Kaplan-Meier analysis. Patients were classified based on summary stage and treatments to determine cancer-specific survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AAI of AMAC fluctuated within a narrow range (0.082-0.237 per million person-years) from 2000 to 2018. AMAC had a slight non-significant trend of worse prognosis than ASCC (p = 0.348) and a better prognosis than AAC (p < 0.01). Females made up a larger proportion of patients diagnosed with the distant disease (p < 0.05) and unmarried (p < 0.05) and somewhat less probably to need surgical removal (p < 0.01) and radiotherapy (p < 0.01). Elderly patients have lower rates of survival (p < 0.05). Localized stage was associated with better prognosis (p < 0.05). Surgery was associated with a tendency toward better survival (p = 0.095).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AMAC exhibits a low incidence yet favorable prognosis compared to typical AAC and slightly worse compared to ASCC. Elderly age is associated with poorer prognosis, while localized stage indicates better prognosis. Surgery demonstrates a trend toward improved survival.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncology Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncology Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539930\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539930","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Population-Based and Propensity Score-Matched Investigation of the Occurrence, Management, and Prognosis of Anal Mucinous Adenocarcinoma Patients.
Introduction: Anal mucinous adenocarcinoma (AMAC) is an extremely rare form of anal cancer. Our objective was to examine the incidence, management, and prognostic factors of AMAC.
Methods: We analyzed age-adjusted incidence (AAI) rates over time and compared the prognosis of AMAC with anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) and adenocarcinoma (AAC) using propensity score matching and Kaplan-Meier analysis. Patients were classified based on summary stage and treatments to determine cancer-specific survival.
Results: AAI of AMAC fluctuated within a narrow range (0.082-0.237 per million person-years) from 2000 to 2018. AMAC had a slight non-significant trend of worse prognosis than ASCC (p = 0.348) and a better prognosis than AAC (p < 0.01). Females made up a larger proportion of patients diagnosed with the distant disease (p < 0.05) and unmarried (p < 0.05) and somewhat less probably to need surgical removal (p < 0.01) and radiotherapy (p < 0.01). Elderly patients have lower rates of survival (p < 0.05). Localized stage was associated with better prognosis (p < 0.05). Surgery was associated with a tendency toward better survival (p = 0.095).
Conclusions: AMAC exhibits a low incidence yet favorable prognosis compared to typical AAC and slightly worse compared to ASCC. Elderly age is associated with poorer prognosis, while localized stage indicates better prognosis. Surgery demonstrates a trend toward improved survival.
期刊介绍：
With the first issue in 2014, the journal ''Onkologie'' has changed its title to ''Oncology Research and Treatment''. By this change, publisher and editor set the scene for the further development of this interdisciplinary journal. The English title makes it clear that the articles are published in English – a logical step for the journal, which is listed in all relevant international databases. For excellent manuscripts, a ''Fast Track'' was introduced: The review is carried out within 2 weeks; after acceptance the papers are published online within 14 days and immediately released as ''Editor’s Choice'' to provide the authors with maximum visibility of their results. Interesting case reports are published in the section ''Novel Insights from Clinical Practice'' which clearly highlights the scientific advances which the report presents.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
