一项评估肿瘤学 I 期试验患者老年病筛查工具的单中心研究。

IF 1.5 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Cancer reports Pub Date : 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1002/cnr2.2083
Mary Van Zyl, Anne Barell, Bridget Cooley, Janet Hanwell, Josie Parlak, Udai Banerji, Johann De Bono, Adam Sharp, Juanita Lopez, Nicolo Matteo Luca Battisti, Anna Minchom
{"title":"一项评估肿瘤学 I 期试验患者老年病筛查工具的单中心研究。","authors":"Mary Van Zyl,&nbsp;Anne Barell,&nbsp;Bridget Cooley,&nbsp;Janet Hanwell,&nbsp;Josie Parlak,&nbsp;Udai Banerji,&nbsp;Johann De Bono,&nbsp;Adam Sharp,&nbsp;Juanita Lopez,&nbsp;Nicolo Matteo Luca Battisti,&nbsp;Anna Minchom","doi":"10.1002/cnr2.2083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Though cancer is more prevalent in the older population, this patient group are underrepresented in phase I oncology trials.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>We evaluated the use of a geriatric screening tool (SAOP3) in patients of 70 years of age or older who attended a Phase I Clinical Trials Unit, with the aim of assessing the feasibility of the tool and identifying potential unmet needs in this patient group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-two patients over the age of 70 completed the SAOP3 questionnaire. Geriatric impairments and needs were analysed with descriptive statistics. Qualitative responses were grouped in themes using structured thematic analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>All of patients triggered at least 1 geriatric domain, most commonly mobility. Six core themes were identified as being important to the patient including family, friends and positivity. On cognition assessment over 20% of patients triggered as requiring further cognitive assessment. The group had a relatively high screen fail risk.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In conclusion, routine geriatric screening withSAOP3 was feasible and identified areas of patient need. Results highlight the prevalence of psychological distress and cognitive impairment. Geriatric screening offers an opportunity for prehabilitation prior to trial and support during trial participation to optimise safety and improve trial access.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9440,"journal":{"name":"Cancer reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11199084/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A single-centre study evaluating a geriatric screening tool in oncology phase I trial patients\",\"authors\":\"Mary Van Zyl,&nbsp;Anne Barell,&nbsp;Bridget Cooley,&nbsp;Janet Hanwell,&nbsp;Josie Parlak,&nbsp;Udai Banerji,&nbsp;Johann De Bono,&nbsp;Adam Sharp,&nbsp;Juanita Lopez,&nbsp;Nicolo Matteo Luca Battisti,&nbsp;Anna Minchom\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cnr2.2083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Though cancer is more prevalent in the older population, this patient group are underrepresented in phase I oncology trials.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>We evaluated the use of a geriatric screening tool (SAOP3) in patients of 70 years of age or older who attended a Phase I Clinical Trials Unit, with the aim of assessing the feasibility of the tool and identifying potential unmet needs in this patient group.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Twenty-two patients over the age of 70 completed the SAOP3 questionnaire. Geriatric impairments and needs were analysed with descriptive statistics. Qualitative responses were grouped in themes using structured thematic analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>All of patients triggered at least 1 geriatric domain, most commonly mobility. Six core themes were identified as being important to the patient including family, friends and positivity. On cognition assessment over 20% of patients triggered as requiring further cognitive assessment. The group had a relatively high screen fail risk.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>In conclusion, routine geriatric screening withSAOP3 was feasible and identified areas of patient need. Results highlight the prevalence of psychological distress and cognitive impairment. Geriatric screening offers an opportunity for prehabilitation prior to trial and support during trial participation to optimise safety and improve trial access.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9440,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11199084/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnr2.2083\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnr2.2083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目的:我们评估了老年筛查工具(SAOP3)在参加一期临床试验的 70 岁或以上患者中的使用情况,目的是评估该工具的可行性并确定该患者群体中潜在的未满足需求:22名70岁以上的患者填写了SAOP3问卷。通过描述性统计分析了老年损伤和需求。采用结构化主题分析法对定性回答进行主题分组:所有患者都触发了至少一个老年医学领域,其中最常见的是行动能力。六个核心主题被确定为对患者非常重要,包括家人、朋友和积极性。在认知评估中,超过 20% 的患者认为需要进行进一步的认知评估。这组患者的筛查失败风险相对较高:总之,使用SAOP3 进行常规老年病筛查是可行的,并能确定患者需要的领域。结果凸显了心理困扰和认知障碍的普遍性。老年病筛查为试验前的预康复和试验参与期间的支持提供了机会,以优化安全性并提高试验的可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A single-centre study evaluating a geriatric screening tool in oncology phase I trial patients

A single-centre study evaluating a geriatric screening tool in oncology phase I trial patients

Background

Though cancer is more prevalent in the older population, this patient group are underrepresented in phase I oncology trials.

Aims

We evaluated the use of a geriatric screening tool (SAOP3) in patients of 70 years of age or older who attended a Phase I Clinical Trials Unit, with the aim of assessing the feasibility of the tool and identifying potential unmet needs in this patient group.

Methods

Twenty-two patients over the age of 70 completed the SAOP3 questionnaire. Geriatric impairments and needs were analysed with descriptive statistics. Qualitative responses were grouped in themes using structured thematic analysis.

Results

All of patients triggered at least 1 geriatric domain, most commonly mobility. Six core themes were identified as being important to the patient including family, friends and positivity. On cognition assessment over 20% of patients triggered as requiring further cognitive assessment. The group had a relatively high screen fail risk.

Conclusion

In conclusion, routine geriatric screening withSAOP3 was feasible and identified areas of patient need. Results highlight the prevalence of psychological distress and cognitive impairment. Geriatric screening offers an opportunity for prehabilitation prior to trial and support during trial participation to optimise safety and improve trial access.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer reports
Cancer reports Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
160
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信