I Nyoman Sutarsa, Lachlan Campbell, I Made Dwi Ariawan, Rosny Kasim, Robert Marten, Dheepa Rajan, Sally Hall Dykgraaf
{"title":"多部门干预措施与卫生系统绩效:系统回顾。","authors":"I Nyoman Sutarsa, Lachlan Campbell, I Made Dwi Ariawan, Rosny Kasim, Robert Marten, Dheepa Rajan, Sally Hall Dykgraaf","doi":"10.2471/BLT.23.291246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct a systematic review on the effects of multisectoral interventions for health on health system performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review according to the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols. We searched for peer-reviewed journal articles in PubMed®, Scopus, Web of Science, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews on 31 August 2023 (updating on 28 February 2024). We removed duplicates, screened titles and abstracts, and then conducted a full-text eligibility and quality assessment.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We identified an initial 1118 non-duplicate publications, 62 of which met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. The largest proportions of reviewed studies focused on multisectoral interventions directly related to specific health outcomes (66.1%; 41 studies) and/or social determinants of health (48.4%; 30 studies), but without explicit reference to overall health system performance. Most reviewed publications did not address process indicators (83.9%; 52/62) or discuss sustainability for multisectoral interventions in health (72.6%; 45/62). However, we observed that the greatest proportion (66.1%; 41/62) considered health system goals: health equity (68.3%; 28/41) and health outcomes (63.4%; 26/41). Although the greatest proportion (64.5%; 40/62) proposed mechanisms explaining how multisectoral interventions for health could lead to the intended outcomes, none used realistic evaluations to assess these.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our review has established that multisectoral interventions influence health system performance through immediate improvements in service delivery efficiency, readiness, acceptability and affordability. The interconnectedness of these effects demonstrates their role in addressing the complexities of modern health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9465,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the World Health Organization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11197648/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multisectoral interventions and health system performance: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"I Nyoman Sutarsa, Lachlan Campbell, I Made Dwi Ariawan, Rosny Kasim, Robert Marten, Dheepa Rajan, Sally Hall Dykgraaf\",\"doi\":\"10.2471/BLT.23.291246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct a systematic review on the effects of multisectoral interventions for health on health system performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review according to the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols. We searched for peer-reviewed journal articles in PubMed®, Scopus, Web of Science, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews on 31 August 2023 (updating on 28 February 2024). We removed duplicates, screened titles and abstracts, and then conducted a full-text eligibility and quality assessment.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We identified an initial 1118 non-duplicate publications, 62 of which met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. The largest proportions of reviewed studies focused on multisectoral interventions directly related to specific health outcomes (66.1%; 41 studies) and/or social determinants of health (48.4%; 30 studies), but without explicit reference to overall health system performance. Most reviewed publications did not address process indicators (83.9%; 52/62) or discuss sustainability for multisectoral interventions in health (72.6%; 45/62). However, we observed that the greatest proportion (66.1%; 41/62) considered health system goals: health equity (68.3%; 28/41) and health outcomes (63.4%; 26/41). Although the greatest proportion (64.5%; 40/62) proposed mechanisms explaining how multisectoral interventions for health could lead to the intended outcomes, none used realistic evaluations to assess these.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our review has established that multisectoral interventions influence health system performance through immediate improvements in service delivery efficiency, readiness, acceptability and affordability. The interconnectedness of these effects demonstrates their role in addressing the complexities of modern health care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the World Health Organization\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11197648/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the World Health Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.23.291246\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the World Health Organization","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.23.291246","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:对多部门卫生干预措施对卫生系统绩效的影响进行系统性审查:就多部门卫生干预措施对卫生系统绩效的影响进行系统综述:我们根据系统综述和荟萃分析协议的首选报告项目进行了系统综述。我们于 2023 年 8 月 31 日(2024 年 2 月 28 日更新)在 PubMed®、Scopus、Web of Science、Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature 和 Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 中检索了经同行评审的期刊文章。我们删除了重复内容,筛选了标题和摘要,然后进行了全文资格和质量评估:我们初步确定了 1118 篇非重复出版物,其中 62 篇符合我们的纳入和排除标准。所审查的研究中,大部分侧重于与特定健康结果直接相关的多部门干预措施(66.1%;41 项研究)和/或健康的社会决定因素(48.4%;30 项研究),但没有明确提及卫生系统的整体绩效。大多数经审查的出版物没有涉及过程指标(83.9%;52/62),也没有讨论卫生领域多部门干预措施的可持续性(72.6%;45/62)。然而,我们注意到,最大比例的出版物(66.1%;41/62)考虑了卫生系统的目标:卫生公平(68.3%;28/41)和卫生成果(63.4%;26/41)。尽管最大比例的研究(64.5%;40/62)提出了解释多部门卫生干预措施如何能够带来预期成果的机制,但没有一项研究使用现实的评价来评估这些机制:我们的审查结果表明,多部门干预措施通过立即提高服务效率、准备程度、可接受性和可负担性来影响卫生系统的绩效。这些效果之间的相互联系表明,多部门干预措施在应对现代医疗保健的复杂性方面发挥着重要作用。
Multisectoral interventions and health system performance: a systematic review.
Objective: To conduct a systematic review on the effects of multisectoral interventions for health on health system performance.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review according to the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols. We searched for peer-reviewed journal articles in PubMed®, Scopus, Web of Science, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews on 31 August 2023 (updating on 28 February 2024). We removed duplicates, screened titles and abstracts, and then conducted a full-text eligibility and quality assessment.
Findings: We identified an initial 1118 non-duplicate publications, 62 of which met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. The largest proportions of reviewed studies focused on multisectoral interventions directly related to specific health outcomes (66.1%; 41 studies) and/or social determinants of health (48.4%; 30 studies), but without explicit reference to overall health system performance. Most reviewed publications did not address process indicators (83.9%; 52/62) or discuss sustainability for multisectoral interventions in health (72.6%; 45/62). However, we observed that the greatest proportion (66.1%; 41/62) considered health system goals: health equity (68.3%; 28/41) and health outcomes (63.4%; 26/41). Although the greatest proportion (64.5%; 40/62) proposed mechanisms explaining how multisectoral interventions for health could lead to the intended outcomes, none used realistic evaluations to assess these.
Conclusion: Our review has established that multisectoral interventions influence health system performance through immediate improvements in service delivery efficiency, readiness, acceptability and affordability. The interconnectedness of these effects demonstrates their role in addressing the complexities of modern health care.
期刊介绍:
The Bulletin of the World Health Organization
Journal Overview:
Leading public health journal
Peer-reviewed monthly journal
Special focus on developing countries
Global scope and authority
Top public and environmental health journal
Impact factor of 6.818 (2018), according to Web of Science ranking
Audience:
Essential reading for public health decision-makers and researchers
Provides blend of research, well-informed opinion, and news