局灶性冲击波提高了肉毒毒素对中风和多发性硬化症脑损伤患者痉挛的疗效并延长了疗程。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Antonio Déniz, Pedro Saavedra, Isabel Marrero, Jaime Hernández
{"title":"局灶性冲击波提高了肉毒毒素对中风和多发性硬化症脑损伤患者痉挛的疗效并延长了疗程。","authors":"Antonio Déniz, Pedro Saavedra, Isabel Marrero, Jaime Hernández","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study is to assess the effects on spasticity reduction of the association between focal extracorporeal shock wave therapy and botulinum toxin type A, versus the toxin only in brain injury patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Eighteen patients were included. The study had two phases: the first phase was observational, and botulinum toxin type A was used. The second was a prospective, deliberate intervention phase in which the toxin was injected and focal extracorporeal shock wave treatment was added (1 sessions/week, for 3 wks). The patients were followed up in the 1st, 4th, and 6th month, the Ashworth Scale criterion was applied, and for those with lower limb involvement and changes in walking, the 10-meter walk test was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients treated with toxin only showed a statistically significant improvement in spasticity, with 1 point on the Ashworth Scale from week 5, which disappeared at week 17. However, the combined therapy reduced spasticity by 2 points from week 1 to week 25 ( P < 0.001), with a faster result in the 10-meter gait test ( P = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combined and simultaneous treatment with botulinum toxin and focal extracorporeal shock wave reduced spasticity in a more effective and prolonged way than treatment with botulinum toxin only.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"226-230"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Focal Shock Waves Increase Efficacy and Prolong the Effect of Botulinum Toxin on Spasticity in Patients With Brain Injury From Stroke and Multiple Sclerosis.\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Déniz, Pedro Saavedra, Isabel Marrero, Jaime Hernández\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study is to assess the effects on spasticity reduction of the association between focal extracorporeal shock wave therapy and botulinum toxin type A, versus the toxin only in brain injury patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Eighteen patients were included. The study had two phases: the first phase was observational, and botulinum toxin type A was used. The second was a prospective, deliberate intervention phase in which the toxin was injected and focal extracorporeal shock wave treatment was added (1 sessions/week, for 3 wks). The patients were followed up in the 1st, 4th, and 6th month, the Ashworth Scale criterion was applied, and for those with lower limb involvement and changes in walking, the 10-meter walk test was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients treated with toxin only showed a statistically significant improvement in spasticity, with 1 point on the Ashworth Scale from week 5, which disappeared at week 17. However, the combined therapy reduced spasticity by 2 points from week 1 to week 25 ( P < 0.001), with a faster result in the 10-meter gait test ( P = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combined and simultaneous treatment with botulinum toxin and focal extracorporeal shock wave reduced spasticity in a more effective and prolonged way than treatment with botulinum toxin only.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"226-230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002575\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002575","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估体外冲击波疗法和A型肉毒毒素联合治疗与仅使用毒素治疗对脑损伤患者痉挛缓解的影响:设计:共纳入 18 名患者。研究分为两个阶段:第一阶段为观察阶段,使用 A 型肉毒杆菌毒素。第二阶段为前瞻性、蓄意干预阶段,在注射毒素的同时,增加了局灶性体外冲击波治疗(每周 1 次,持续 3 周)。在第一、第四和第六个月对患者进行随访,采用阿什沃斯量表标准,并对下肢受累和行走发生变化的患者采用 10 米步行测试:结果:仅接受毒素治疗的患者的痉挛症状在统计学上有显著改善,从第 5 周起,阿什沃斯量表上的评分增加了 1 分,在第 17 周时消失。然而,从第1周到第25周,联合疗法使痉挛程度减轻了2分(p < 0.001),10米步态测试的结果更快(p = 0.004):结论:与仅使用肉毒杆菌毒素治疗相比,同时使用肉毒杆菌毒素和局灶性体外冲击波联合治疗能更有效、更持久地减轻痉挛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Focal Shock Waves Increase Efficacy and Prolong the Effect of Botulinum Toxin on Spasticity in Patients With Brain Injury From Stroke and Multiple Sclerosis.

Objective: The aim of the study is to assess the effects on spasticity reduction of the association between focal extracorporeal shock wave therapy and botulinum toxin type A, versus the toxin only in brain injury patients.

Design: Eighteen patients were included. The study had two phases: the first phase was observational, and botulinum toxin type A was used. The second was a prospective, deliberate intervention phase in which the toxin was injected and focal extracorporeal shock wave treatment was added (1 sessions/week, for 3 wks). The patients were followed up in the 1st, 4th, and 6th month, the Ashworth Scale criterion was applied, and for those with lower limb involvement and changes in walking, the 10-meter walk test was used.

Results: Patients treated with toxin only showed a statistically significant improvement in spasticity, with 1 point on the Ashworth Scale from week 5, which disappeared at week 17. However, the combined therapy reduced spasticity by 2 points from week 1 to week 25 ( P < 0.001), with a faster result in the 10-meter gait test ( P = 0.004).

Conclusions: Combined and simultaneous treatment with botulinum toxin and focal extracorporeal shock wave reduced spasticity in a more effective and prolonged way than treatment with botulinum toxin only.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
423
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals. Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信