{"title":"更严格的污水处理目标政策是否会加剧污水水质改善与碳减排之间的矛盾?来自中国的证据","authors":"Xuan Yang , Cuncun Duan , Bin Chen , Saige Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Rapid expansion and upgrading of wastewater treatment facilities globally, driven by stricter wastewater policies, significantly contribute to carbon emissions. China has contributed 30 % of carbon emissions in the world, 1 % of which comes from wastewater treatment, necessitating more understanding of the impact of policies, especially the stringent “10-Point Water Plan” policy. From a micro perspective, this study uses the difference-in-differences method to analyze the impact of wastewater treatment policies on water and carbon issues in China’s 2894 wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), and delves into the heterogeneity, and mechanisms across various dimensions. The results show that stricter sewage treatment policy decrease effluent concentration of the chemical oxygen demand (COD) by 2.35 %, and also cause a 1.74 % rise in carbon emissions per 10,000 m<sup>3</sup> of wastewater treated, intensifying the short-term contradiction, while the contradictions may fall in the long term. It is more significant in southern regions and the cities with lower environmental regulation intensity. Also, there are significant differences in different wastewater treatment technology and scale. Significant improvements in effluent water quality are observed in WWTPs with 100,000 to 200,000 m<sup>3</sup>/day capacity and those using biofilm treatment technology. Through mechanism analysis, reasonable expansion of urban pipelines and WWTPs, promotion of biofilm treatment technology, reduction of energy consumption, and improvement of pollutant reduction efficiency are feasible paths to improve water quality and reduce carbon emissions. This research provides a perspective on solving water-carbon contradictions in WWTPs, holding critical significance for urban wastewater treatment and carbon emission management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":328,"journal":{"name":"Global Environmental Change","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 102881"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does stricter sewage treatment targets policy exacerbate the contradiction between effluent water quality improvement and carbon emissions mitigation? An evidence from China\",\"authors\":\"Xuan Yang , Cuncun Duan , Bin Chen , Saige Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102881\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Rapid expansion and upgrading of wastewater treatment facilities globally, driven by stricter wastewater policies, significantly contribute to carbon emissions. China has contributed 30 % of carbon emissions in the world, 1 % of which comes from wastewater treatment, necessitating more understanding of the impact of policies, especially the stringent “10-Point Water Plan” policy. From a micro perspective, this study uses the difference-in-differences method to analyze the impact of wastewater treatment policies on water and carbon issues in China’s 2894 wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), and delves into the heterogeneity, and mechanisms across various dimensions. The results show that stricter sewage treatment policy decrease effluent concentration of the chemical oxygen demand (COD) by 2.35 %, and also cause a 1.74 % rise in carbon emissions per 10,000 m<sup>3</sup> of wastewater treated, intensifying the short-term contradiction, while the contradictions may fall in the long term. It is more significant in southern regions and the cities with lower environmental regulation intensity. Also, there are significant differences in different wastewater treatment technology and scale. Significant improvements in effluent water quality are observed in WWTPs with 100,000 to 200,000 m<sup>3</sup>/day capacity and those using biofilm treatment technology. Through mechanism analysis, reasonable expansion of urban pipelines and WWTPs, promotion of biofilm treatment technology, reduction of energy consumption, and improvement of pollutant reduction efficiency are feasible paths to improve water quality and reduce carbon emissions. This research provides a perspective on solving water-carbon contradictions in WWTPs, holding critical significance for urban wastewater treatment and carbon emission management.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Environmental Change\",\"volume\":\"87 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102881\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Environmental Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"6\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378024000852\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Environmental Change","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378024000852","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does stricter sewage treatment targets policy exacerbate the contradiction between effluent water quality improvement and carbon emissions mitigation? An evidence from China
Rapid expansion and upgrading of wastewater treatment facilities globally, driven by stricter wastewater policies, significantly contribute to carbon emissions. China has contributed 30 % of carbon emissions in the world, 1 % of which comes from wastewater treatment, necessitating more understanding of the impact of policies, especially the stringent “10-Point Water Plan” policy. From a micro perspective, this study uses the difference-in-differences method to analyze the impact of wastewater treatment policies on water and carbon issues in China’s 2894 wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), and delves into the heterogeneity, and mechanisms across various dimensions. The results show that stricter sewage treatment policy decrease effluent concentration of the chemical oxygen demand (COD) by 2.35 %, and also cause a 1.74 % rise in carbon emissions per 10,000 m3 of wastewater treated, intensifying the short-term contradiction, while the contradictions may fall in the long term. It is more significant in southern regions and the cities with lower environmental regulation intensity. Also, there are significant differences in different wastewater treatment technology and scale. Significant improvements in effluent water quality are observed in WWTPs with 100,000 to 200,000 m3/day capacity and those using biofilm treatment technology. Through mechanism analysis, reasonable expansion of urban pipelines and WWTPs, promotion of biofilm treatment technology, reduction of energy consumption, and improvement of pollutant reduction efficiency are feasible paths to improve water quality and reduce carbon emissions. This research provides a perspective on solving water-carbon contradictions in WWTPs, holding critical significance for urban wastewater treatment and carbon emission management.
期刊介绍:
Global Environmental Change is a prestigious international journal that publishes articles of high quality, both theoretically and empirically rigorous. The journal aims to contribute to the understanding of global environmental change from the perspectives of human and policy dimensions. Specifically, it considers global environmental change as the result of processes occurring at the local level, but with wide-ranging impacts on various spatial, temporal, and socio-political scales.
In terms of content, the journal seeks articles with a strong social science component. This includes research that examines the societal drivers and consequences of environmental change, as well as social and policy processes that aim to address these challenges. While the journal covers a broad range of topics, including biodiversity and ecosystem services, climate, coasts, food systems, land use and land cover, oceans, urban areas, and water resources, it also welcomes contributions that investigate the drivers, consequences, and management of other areas affected by environmental change.
Overall, Global Environmental Change encourages research that deepens our understanding of the complex interactions between human activities and the environment, with the goal of informing policy and decision-making.