婴儿期学习语音类别:单词语境信息的作用

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Chiara Santolin , Camille Frey , Nuria Sebastian-Galles
{"title":"婴儿期学习语音类别:单词语境信息的作用","authors":"Chiara Santolin ,&nbsp;Camille Frey ,&nbsp;Nuria Sebastian-Galles","doi":"10.1016/j.infbeh.2024.101961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Identifying the type of mechanisms at the core of phonetic categorization remains a central subject of research in infant language learning. Amongst different theories, one is that infants compute distributional information of phonemes based on their surrounding sounds (i.e., word context) such that phonemes that appear in different word contexts are more likely to be discriminated and categorized separately than phonemes that appear in similar word contexts. Following the procedure of Feldman et al. (2013a), we investigated the role of contextual information in the acquisition of phonetic categories in 8-month-old infants, using a non-native vowel contrast (English /ɒ/-/ʌ/). In Experiment 1, we established lack of discrimination of the non-native contrast without prior exposure to it. In Experiment 2, we manipulated the type of exposure prior to testing: half of the infants were exposed to minimal pair carriers (words that differ by one phoneme only; e.g., <em>lituh</em> and <em>litoh</em>), and the other half of the infants were exposed to non-minimal pair carriers (words formed by different phonemes; e.g., <em>lituh</em> and <em>nutoh</em>). All infants were tested for discrimination of the contrast (<em>tuh</em> vs. <em>toh</em>) presented as alternating (e.g., <em>tuh-toh-tuh-toh</em>) and non-alternating trials (e.g., <em>tuh-tuh-tuh</em>), as in Experiment 1. Infants in both conditions looked on average longer at alternating rather than non-alternating trials, suggesting that they discriminated the /ɒ/-/ʌ/ contrast after a brief exposure to the vowels embedded into words. Crucially, discrimination occurred regardless of whether words were minimal pair carriers or non-minimal pair carriers. A cross-experiment comparison revealed that infants showed different patterns of looking times based on whether they were exposed to the contrast before testing (Experiment 2) or not (Experiment 1). Our study shows that any type of word context helps infants to re-establish discrimination of non-native contrasts once sensitivity has been lost. These findings aid to better understand how the speech input modulates learning mechanisms during the establishment of phonetic categories in the first year of postnatal life.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48222,"journal":{"name":"Infant Behavior & Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning phonetic categories in infancy: The role of word-context information\",\"authors\":\"Chiara Santolin ,&nbsp;Camille Frey ,&nbsp;Nuria Sebastian-Galles\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.infbeh.2024.101961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Identifying the type of mechanisms at the core of phonetic categorization remains a central subject of research in infant language learning. Amongst different theories, one is that infants compute distributional information of phonemes based on their surrounding sounds (i.e., word context) such that phonemes that appear in different word contexts are more likely to be discriminated and categorized separately than phonemes that appear in similar word contexts. Following the procedure of Feldman et al. (2013a), we investigated the role of contextual information in the acquisition of phonetic categories in 8-month-old infants, using a non-native vowel contrast (English /ɒ/-/ʌ/). In Experiment 1, we established lack of discrimination of the non-native contrast without prior exposure to it. In Experiment 2, we manipulated the type of exposure prior to testing: half of the infants were exposed to minimal pair carriers (words that differ by one phoneme only; e.g., <em>lituh</em> and <em>litoh</em>), and the other half of the infants were exposed to non-minimal pair carriers (words formed by different phonemes; e.g., <em>lituh</em> and <em>nutoh</em>). All infants were tested for discrimination of the contrast (<em>tuh</em> vs. <em>toh</em>) presented as alternating (e.g., <em>tuh-toh-tuh-toh</em>) and non-alternating trials (e.g., <em>tuh-tuh-tuh</em>), as in Experiment 1. Infants in both conditions looked on average longer at alternating rather than non-alternating trials, suggesting that they discriminated the /ɒ/-/ʌ/ contrast after a brief exposure to the vowels embedded into words. Crucially, discrimination occurred regardless of whether words were minimal pair carriers or non-minimal pair carriers. A cross-experiment comparison revealed that infants showed different patterns of looking times based on whether they were exposed to the contrast before testing (Experiment 2) or not (Experiment 1). Our study shows that any type of word context helps infants to re-establish discrimination of non-native contrasts once sensitivity has been lost. These findings aid to better understand how the speech input modulates learning mechanisms during the establishment of phonetic categories in the first year of postnatal life.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infant Behavior & Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infant Behavior & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163638324000407\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infant Behavior & Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163638324000407","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

确定音素分类的核心机制类型仍然是婴儿语言学习研究的核心课题。在不同的理论中,有一种理论认为,婴儿会根据音素周围的声音(即单词语境)来计算音素的分布信息,因此出现在不同单词语境中的音素比出现在相似单词语境中的音素更容易被区分和分类。按照 Feldman 等人(2013a)的研究步骤,我们使用非母语元音对比(英语/ɒ/-/ʌ/)研究了语境信息在 8 个月大婴儿音素类别习得中的作用。在实验 1 中,我们确定婴儿在未接触非母语对比的情况下缺乏辨别能力。在实验 2 中,我们对测试前的接触类型进行了处理:一半婴儿接触了最小的词对载体(仅有一个音素不同的单词,如 lituh 和 litoh),另一半婴儿接触了非最小的词对载体(由不同音素组成的单词,如 lituh 和 nutoh)。与实验 1 一样,所有婴儿都接受了以交替试验(如 tuh-toh-tuh-toh)和非交替试验(如 tuh-tuh-tuh)形式呈现的对比(tuh 与 toh)辨别力测试。在这两种条件下,婴儿在交替试验中的平均注视时间都长于非交替试验,这表明他们在短暂接触嵌入单词中的元音后,就能分辨出/ɒ/-/ʌ/对比。最重要的是,无论单词是最小词对载体还是非最小词对载体,他们都能分辨出/ɒ/-/ʌ/。交叉实验比较显示,婴儿在测试前接触对比(实验 2)或未接触对比(实验 1)时,会表现出不同的观察时间模式。我们的研究表明,任何类型的单词语境都有助于婴儿在丧失敏感性后重新建立对非母语对比的辨别能力。这些发现有助于更好地理解语音输入是如何在婴儿出生后第一年建立语音类别的过程中调节学习机制的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learning phonetic categories in infancy: The role of word-context information

Identifying the type of mechanisms at the core of phonetic categorization remains a central subject of research in infant language learning. Amongst different theories, one is that infants compute distributional information of phonemes based on their surrounding sounds (i.e., word context) such that phonemes that appear in different word contexts are more likely to be discriminated and categorized separately than phonemes that appear in similar word contexts. Following the procedure of Feldman et al. (2013a), we investigated the role of contextual information in the acquisition of phonetic categories in 8-month-old infants, using a non-native vowel contrast (English /ɒ/-/ʌ/). In Experiment 1, we established lack of discrimination of the non-native contrast without prior exposure to it. In Experiment 2, we manipulated the type of exposure prior to testing: half of the infants were exposed to minimal pair carriers (words that differ by one phoneme only; e.g., lituh and litoh), and the other half of the infants were exposed to non-minimal pair carriers (words formed by different phonemes; e.g., lituh and nutoh). All infants were tested for discrimination of the contrast (tuh vs. toh) presented as alternating (e.g., tuh-toh-tuh-toh) and non-alternating trials (e.g., tuh-tuh-tuh), as in Experiment 1. Infants in both conditions looked on average longer at alternating rather than non-alternating trials, suggesting that they discriminated the /ɒ/-/ʌ/ contrast after a brief exposure to the vowels embedded into words. Crucially, discrimination occurred regardless of whether words were minimal pair carriers or non-minimal pair carriers. A cross-experiment comparison revealed that infants showed different patterns of looking times based on whether they were exposed to the contrast before testing (Experiment 2) or not (Experiment 1). Our study shows that any type of word context helps infants to re-establish discrimination of non-native contrasts once sensitivity has been lost. These findings aid to better understand how the speech input modulates learning mechanisms during the establishment of phonetic categories in the first year of postnatal life.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infant Behavior & Development
Infant Behavior & Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Infant Behavior & Development publishes empirical (fundamental and clinical), theoretical, methodological and review papers. Brief reports dealing with behavioral development during infancy (up to 3 years) will also be considered. Papers of an inter- and multidisciplinary nature, for example neuroscience, non-linear dynamics and modelling approaches, are particularly encouraged. Areas covered by the journal include cognitive development, emotional development, perception, perception-action coupling, motor development and socialisation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信