加拿大一家儿童医院对当前急诊科预防策略在减少急诊科复诊方面的有效性和充分性进行的真实世界评估:一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Tahereh Haji, Lynnette Lyzwinski, Cara Dhaliwal, Garvin Leung, Sandra Giangioppo, Dhenuka Radhakrishnan
{"title":"加拿大一家儿童医院对当前急诊科预防策略在减少急诊科复诊方面的有效性和充分性进行的真实世界评估:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Tahereh Haji, Lynnette Lyzwinski, Cara Dhaliwal, Garvin Leung, Sandra Giangioppo, Dhenuka Radhakrishnan","doi":"10.1186/s13223-024-00900-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite asthma guidelines' recommended emergency department preventative strategies (EDPS), repeat asthma-related emergency department (ED) visits remain frequent.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study of children aged 1-17 years presenting with asthma to the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) ED between September 1, 2014 - August 31, 2015. EDPS was defined as provision of education on trigger avoidance and medication technique plus documentation of an asthma action plan, a prescription for an inhaled controller medication or referral to a specialist. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with receipt of EDPS. We further compared the odds of repeat presentation to the ED within the following year among children who had received EDPS versus those who had not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1301 patients were included, and the mean age of those who received EDPS was 5.0 years (SD = 3.7). Those with a moderate (OR = 3.67, 95% CI: 2.49, 5.52) to severe (OR = 3.69, 95% CI: 2.50, 5.45) asthma presentation were most likely to receive EDPS. Receiving EDPS did not significantly reduce the adjusted odds of repeat ED visits, (OR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.56, 1.18, p = 0.28).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with higher severity asthma presentations to the ED were more likely to receive EDPS, but this did not appear to significantly decrease the proportion with a repeat asthma ED visit. These findings suggest that receipt of EDPS in the ED may not be sufficient to prevent repeat asthma ED visits in all children.</p>","PeriodicalId":51302,"journal":{"name":"Allergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology","volume":"20 1","pages":"37"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11197375/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A real-world evaluation of the effectiveness and Sufficiency of Current Emergency Department Preventative Strategies for Reducing Emergency Department revisits in a Canadian children's hospital: a retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Tahereh Haji, Lynnette Lyzwinski, Cara Dhaliwal, Garvin Leung, Sandra Giangioppo, Dhenuka Radhakrishnan\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13223-024-00900-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite asthma guidelines' recommended emergency department preventative strategies (EDPS), repeat asthma-related emergency department (ED) visits remain frequent.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study of children aged 1-17 years presenting with asthma to the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) ED between September 1, 2014 - August 31, 2015. EDPS was defined as provision of education on trigger avoidance and medication technique plus documentation of an asthma action plan, a prescription for an inhaled controller medication or referral to a specialist. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with receipt of EDPS. We further compared the odds of repeat presentation to the ED within the following year among children who had received EDPS versus those who had not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1301 patients were included, and the mean age of those who received EDPS was 5.0 years (SD = 3.7). Those with a moderate (OR = 3.67, 95% CI: 2.49, 5.52) to severe (OR = 3.69, 95% CI: 2.50, 5.45) asthma presentation were most likely to receive EDPS. Receiving EDPS did not significantly reduce the adjusted odds of repeat ED visits, (OR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.56, 1.18, p = 0.28).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with higher severity asthma presentations to the ED were more likely to receive EDPS, but this did not appear to significantly decrease the proportion with a repeat asthma ED visit. These findings suggest that receipt of EDPS in the ED may not be sufficient to prevent repeat asthma ED visits in all children.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Allergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11197375/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Allergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-024-00900-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-024-00900-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管哮喘指南推荐了急诊科预防策略(EDPS),但与哮喘相关的重复急诊就诊仍很频繁:我们对 2014 年 9 月 1 日至 2015 年 8 月 31 日期间因哮喘到东安大略省儿童医院(CHEO)急诊科就诊的 1-17 岁儿童进行了一项回顾性队列研究。EDPS的定义是提供有关避免诱发因素和用药技巧的教育,并记录哮喘行动计划、吸入控制药物处方或转诊至专科医生。我们采用逻辑回归法来确定接受 EDPS 的相关因素。我们进一步比较了接受过 EDPS 与未接受过 EDPS 的儿童在次年内再次前往急诊室就诊的几率:共纳入 1301 名患者,接受 EDPS 治疗的患者平均年龄为 5.0 岁(SD = 3.7)。中度(OR = 3.67,95% CI:2.49,5.52)至重度(OR = 3.69,95% CI:2.50,5.45)哮喘患者最有可能接受 EDPS。接受 EDPS 并未明显降低 ED 重复就诊的调整后几率(OR = 0.82,95% CI:0.56, 1.18,p = 0.28):结论:在急诊室就诊的哮喘严重程度较高的患者更有可能接受 EDPS 治疗,但这似乎并没有明显降低哮喘患者在急诊室重复就诊的比例。这些研究结果表明,在急诊室接受EDPS治疗可能并不足以防止所有儿童再次到急诊室就诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A real-world evaluation of the effectiveness and Sufficiency of Current Emergency Department Preventative Strategies for Reducing Emergency Department revisits in a Canadian children's hospital: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: Despite asthma guidelines' recommended emergency department preventative strategies (EDPS), repeat asthma-related emergency department (ED) visits remain frequent.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of children aged 1-17 years presenting with asthma to the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) ED between September 1, 2014 - August 31, 2015. EDPS was defined as provision of education on trigger avoidance and medication technique plus documentation of an asthma action plan, a prescription for an inhaled controller medication or referral to a specialist. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with receipt of EDPS. We further compared the odds of repeat presentation to the ED within the following year among children who had received EDPS versus those who had not.

Results: 1301 patients were included, and the mean age of those who received EDPS was 5.0 years (SD = 3.7). Those with a moderate (OR = 3.67, 95% CI: 2.49, 5.52) to severe (OR = 3.69, 95% CI: 2.50, 5.45) asthma presentation were most likely to receive EDPS. Receiving EDPS did not significantly reduce the adjusted odds of repeat ED visits, (OR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.56, 1.18, p = 0.28).

Conclusions: Patients with higher severity asthma presentations to the ED were more likely to receive EDPS, but this did not appear to significantly decrease the proportion with a repeat asthma ED visit. These findings suggest that receipt of EDPS in the ED may not be sufficient to prevent repeat asthma ED visits in all children.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
96
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology (AACI), the official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (CSACI), is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of diagnosis, epidemiology, prevention and treatment of allergic and immunologic disease. By offering a high-visibility forum for new insights and discussions, AACI provides a platform for the dissemination of allergy and clinical immunology research and reviews amongst allergists, pulmonologists, immunologists and other physicians, healthcare workers, medical students and the public worldwide. AACI reports on basic research and clinically applied studies in the following areas and other related topics: asthma and occupational lung disease, rhinoconjunctivitis and rhinosinusitis, drug hypersensitivity, allergic skin diseases, urticaria and angioedema, venom hypersensitivity, anaphylaxis and food allergy, immunotherapy, immune modulators and biologics, immune deficiency and autoimmunity, T cell and B cell functions, regulatory T cells, natural killer cells, mast cell and eosinophil functions, complement abnormalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信