遵守急性食管食物栓塞治疗性胃镜检查指南:对不良后果和住院时间的影响。

IF 1.7 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
JGH Open Pub Date : 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1002/jgh3.13114
Fei Yang Pan, Tuan Anh Duong, Kimberley J. Davis, Matthew Smale, Sahil Kapoor, Claudia Rogge
{"title":"遵守急性食管食物栓塞治疗性胃镜检查指南:对不良后果和住院时间的影响。","authors":"Fei Yang Pan,&nbsp;Tuan Anh Duong,&nbsp;Kimberley J. Davis,&nbsp;Matthew Smale,&nbsp;Sahil Kapoor,&nbsp;Claudia Rogge","doi":"10.1002/jgh3.13114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aim</h3>\n \n <p>According to the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), gastroscopy should be conducted within 6 h for complete obstruction and 24 h for incomplete obstruction due to food bolus impaction. This study explores whether adults with acute esophageal food bolus (FB) impaction experience adverse outcomes when their time to esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) deviates from the recommended guidelines.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective review was performed on the records of 248 patients who presented at the study site between 2015 and 2022 with symptoms of FB impaction.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Two hundred and forty-eight patients underwent EGD for FB impaction. Grade 1 (erosion, ulceration), Grade 2 (tear), and Grade 3 (perforation) complications were present in 31.6%, 6.9%, and 0.8% of cases, respectively. Of the 134 (54.0%) patients with complete obstruction, 51 (38.1%) received EGD within the recommended 6 h. Of the 114 (46%) patients with incomplete obstructions, 93 (81.6%) received EGD within the recommended 24 h. There was no statistically significant correlation between length of stay (LOS) post-EGD and any of ingestion to presentation time, presentation to EGD time, or ingestion to EGD time. Age and complication level were greater predictors of longer LOS than presentation to EGD time. Patients who presented in hours were significantly more likely to receive EGD within the 6- and 24-h guidelines than those who presented out of hours (50.7% <i>vs</i> 22.0%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Neither time to EGD from ingestion of food bolus nor time to EGD from hospital presentation correlated with complication rate, complication severity, or length of stay post-EGD.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":45861,"journal":{"name":"JGH Open","volume":"8 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11197022/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adherence to therapeutic gastroscopy guidelines for acute esophageal food bolus impaction: Impact on adverse outcomes and length of stay\",\"authors\":\"Fei Yang Pan,&nbsp;Tuan Anh Duong,&nbsp;Kimberley J. Davis,&nbsp;Matthew Smale,&nbsp;Sahil Kapoor,&nbsp;Claudia Rogge\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jgh3.13114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>According to the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), gastroscopy should be conducted within 6 h for complete obstruction and 24 h for incomplete obstruction due to food bolus impaction. This study explores whether adults with acute esophageal food bolus (FB) impaction experience adverse outcomes when their time to esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) deviates from the recommended guidelines.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A retrospective review was performed on the records of 248 patients who presented at the study site between 2015 and 2022 with symptoms of FB impaction.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Two hundred and forty-eight patients underwent EGD for FB impaction. Grade 1 (erosion, ulceration), Grade 2 (tear), and Grade 3 (perforation) complications were present in 31.6%, 6.9%, and 0.8% of cases, respectively. Of the 134 (54.0%) patients with complete obstruction, 51 (38.1%) received EGD within the recommended 6 h. Of the 114 (46%) patients with incomplete obstructions, 93 (81.6%) received EGD within the recommended 24 h. There was no statistically significant correlation between length of stay (LOS) post-EGD and any of ingestion to presentation time, presentation to EGD time, or ingestion to EGD time. Age and complication level were greater predictors of longer LOS than presentation to EGD time. Patients who presented in hours were significantly more likely to receive EGD within the 6- and 24-h guidelines than those who presented out of hours (50.7% <i>vs</i> 22.0%).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Neither time to EGD from ingestion of food bolus nor time to EGD from hospital presentation correlated with complication rate, complication severity, or length of stay post-EGD.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JGH Open\",\"volume\":\"8 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11197022/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JGH Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgh3.13114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JGH Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgh3.13114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:根据欧洲消化内镜学会(ESGE)的规定,因食栓嵌塞导致的完全性梗阻应在6小时内进行胃镜检查,不完全性梗阻应在24小时内进行胃镜检查。本研究探讨了成人急性食管栓塞(FB)患者接受食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)的时间偏离建议指南时是否会出现不良后果:对2015年至2022年期间在研究地点就诊的248名有FB嵌塞症状的患者的记录进行了回顾性审查:248名患者因FB嵌塞接受了胃肠镜检查。1级(糜烂、溃疡)、2级(撕裂)和3级(穿孔)并发症分别占31.6%、6.9%和0.8%。在 134 例(54.0%)完全梗阻患者中,有 51 例(38.1%)在建议的 6 小时内接受了胃肠造影检查;在 114 例(46%)不完全梗阻患者中,有 93 例(81.6%)在建议的 24 小时内接受了胃肠造影检查。年龄和并发症程度比从就诊到做胃肠造影检查的时间更能预测住院时间的长短。在数小时内就诊的患者在6小时和24小时内接受胃肠造影检查的几率明显高于非数小时内就诊的患者(50.7% vs 22.0%):结论:从摄入食糜到接受胃肠造影检查的时间和从入院到接受胃肠造影检查的时间都与并发症发生率、并发症严重程度或胃肠造影检查后的住院时间无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Adherence to therapeutic gastroscopy guidelines for acute esophageal food bolus impaction: Impact on adverse outcomes and length of stay

Adherence to therapeutic gastroscopy guidelines for acute esophageal food bolus impaction: Impact on adverse outcomes and length of stay

Background and Aim

According to the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), gastroscopy should be conducted within 6 h for complete obstruction and 24 h for incomplete obstruction due to food bolus impaction. This study explores whether adults with acute esophageal food bolus (FB) impaction experience adverse outcomes when their time to esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) deviates from the recommended guidelines.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed on the records of 248 patients who presented at the study site between 2015 and 2022 with symptoms of FB impaction.

Results

Two hundred and forty-eight patients underwent EGD for FB impaction. Grade 1 (erosion, ulceration), Grade 2 (tear), and Grade 3 (perforation) complications were present in 31.6%, 6.9%, and 0.8% of cases, respectively. Of the 134 (54.0%) patients with complete obstruction, 51 (38.1%) received EGD within the recommended 6 h. Of the 114 (46%) patients with incomplete obstructions, 93 (81.6%) received EGD within the recommended 24 h. There was no statistically significant correlation between length of stay (LOS) post-EGD and any of ingestion to presentation time, presentation to EGD time, or ingestion to EGD time. Age and complication level were greater predictors of longer LOS than presentation to EGD time. Patients who presented in hours were significantly more likely to receive EGD within the 6- and 24-h guidelines than those who presented out of hours (50.7% vs 22.0%).

Conclusion

Neither time to EGD from ingestion of food bolus nor time to EGD from hospital presentation correlated with complication rate, complication severity, or length of stay post-EGD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JGH Open
JGH Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信