{"title":"高强度激光疗法和超声波疗法对中风偏瘫患者肩部疼痛的疗效比较:随机对照试验\"。","authors":"Piyapat Dajpratham, Rinlada Pongratanakul, Tipchutha Satidwongpibool, Nawapat Kluabwang, Piyapong Akkathep, Thaniyaporn Claikhem","doi":"10.1080/10749357.2024.2359343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hemiplegic shoulder pain (HSP) is a prevalent clinical manifestation following stroke, often causing considerable discomfort and disability. Various therapeutic approaches have been developed to address HSP.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of HILT versus US therapy in alleviating HSP in stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A double-blind randomized controlled trial enrolled stroke patients with HSP within one year post-onset. Participants were randomly assigned to HILT (with sham US) or US therapy (with sham HILT). Both groups received 10-minute sessions of their assigned therapy modality along with daily shoulder range of motion (ROM) exercises 5 times per week over two consecutive weeks. Pain reduction was the primary outcome, with shoulder ROM as secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients (11 women, 19 men; mean age: 60.80 ± 11.51 years) were included. After the two-week intervention, significant improvements were observed in pain reduction at rest and during motion in the HILT group, and in pain reduction during motion and shoulder internal rotation in the US group compared to pre-treatment values within each group. However, there was no significant difference between the HILT and US therapy groups in any evaluated parameter.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Comparable efficacy was found between HILT and US therapy in reducing pain and improving shoulder ROM for HSP in stroke patients. Both modalities, when combined with shoulder ROM exercises, offer viable options for managing HSP in this population. Further research with larger sample sizes is needed to validate these findings and explore long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23164,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative effectiveness of high-intensity laser therapy and ultrasound therapy for hemiplegic shoulder pain in stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial\\\".\",\"authors\":\"Piyapat Dajpratham, Rinlada Pongratanakul, Tipchutha Satidwongpibool, Nawapat Kluabwang, Piyapong Akkathep, Thaniyaporn Claikhem\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10749357.2024.2359343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hemiplegic shoulder pain (HSP) is a prevalent clinical manifestation following stroke, often causing considerable discomfort and disability. Various therapeutic approaches have been developed to address HSP.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of HILT versus US therapy in alleviating HSP in stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A double-blind randomized controlled trial enrolled stroke patients with HSP within one year post-onset. Participants were randomly assigned to HILT (with sham US) or US therapy (with sham HILT). Both groups received 10-minute sessions of their assigned therapy modality along with daily shoulder range of motion (ROM) exercises 5 times per week over two consecutive weeks. Pain reduction was the primary outcome, with shoulder ROM as secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients (11 women, 19 men; mean age: 60.80 ± 11.51 years) were included. After the two-week intervention, significant improvements were observed in pain reduction at rest and during motion in the HILT group, and in pain reduction during motion and shoulder internal rotation in the US group compared to pre-treatment values within each group. However, there was no significant difference between the HILT and US therapy groups in any evaluated parameter.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Comparable efficacy was found between HILT and US therapy in reducing pain and improving shoulder ROM for HSP in stroke patients. Both modalities, when combined with shoulder ROM exercises, offer viable options for managing HSP in this population. Further research with larger sample sizes is needed to validate these findings and explore long-term outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2024.2359343\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2024.2359343","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:肩部偏瘫痛(HSP)是中风后的一种常见临床表现,通常会造成严重不适和残疾。针对 HSP 的治疗方法多种多样:本研究旨在比较 HILT 与 US 治疗在缓解中风患者 HSP 方面的效果:一项双盲随机对照试验招募了发病后一年内患有HSP的中风患者。参与者被随机分配接受 HILT(假 US)或 US 治疗(假 HILT)。两组患者均在连续两周内接受 10 分钟的指定治疗模式,同时进行每周 5 次的日常肩关节活动范围 (ROM) 锻炼。疼痛减轻是主要结果,肩关节活动度是次要结果:共纳入 30 名患者(11 名女性,19 名男性;平均年龄:60.80 ± 11.51 岁)。经过两周的干预后,与治疗前的数值相比,HILT 组患者休息时和运动时的疼痛减轻情况有明显改善,US 组患者运动时和肩关节内旋时的疼痛减轻情况也有明显改善。然而,HILT 组和 US 治疗组在任何评估参数上都没有明显差异:结论:HILT疗法和US疗法在减轻中风患者HSP疼痛和改善肩关节活动度方面的疗效相当。这两种疗法与肩关节 ROM 锻炼相结合,可为这类人群提供可行的 HSP 治疗方案。要验证这些研究结果并探索长期疗效,还需要进行更大规模的样本研究。
Comparative effectiveness of high-intensity laser therapy and ultrasound therapy for hemiplegic shoulder pain in stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial".
Background: Hemiplegic shoulder pain (HSP) is a prevalent clinical manifestation following stroke, often causing considerable discomfort and disability. Various therapeutic approaches have been developed to address HSP.
Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of HILT versus US therapy in alleviating HSP in stroke patients.
Methods: A double-blind randomized controlled trial enrolled stroke patients with HSP within one year post-onset. Participants were randomly assigned to HILT (with sham US) or US therapy (with sham HILT). Both groups received 10-minute sessions of their assigned therapy modality along with daily shoulder range of motion (ROM) exercises 5 times per week over two consecutive weeks. Pain reduction was the primary outcome, with shoulder ROM as secondary outcomes.
Results: Thirty patients (11 women, 19 men; mean age: 60.80 ± 11.51 years) were included. After the two-week intervention, significant improvements were observed in pain reduction at rest and during motion in the HILT group, and in pain reduction during motion and shoulder internal rotation in the US group compared to pre-treatment values within each group. However, there was no significant difference between the HILT and US therapy groups in any evaluated parameter.
Conclusions: Comparable efficacy was found between HILT and US therapy in reducing pain and improving shoulder ROM for HSP in stroke patients. Both modalities, when combined with shoulder ROM exercises, offer viable options for managing HSP in this population. Further research with larger sample sizes is needed to validate these findings and explore long-term outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation is the leading journal devoted to the study and dissemination of interdisciplinary, evidence-based, clinical information related to stroke rehabilitation. The journal’s scope covers physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, neurorehabilitation, neural engineering and therapeutics, neuropsychology and cognition, optimization of the rehabilitation system, robotics and biomechanics, pain management, nursing, physical therapy, cardiopulmonary fitness, mobility, occupational therapy, speech pathology and communication. There is a particular focus on stroke recovery, improving rehabilitation outcomes, quality of life, activities of daily living, motor control, family and care givers, and community issues.
The journal reviews and reports clinical practices, clinical trials, state-of-the-art concepts, and new developments in stroke research and patient care. Both primary research papers, reviews of existing literature, and invited editorials, are included. Sharply-focused, single-issue topics, and the latest in clinical research, provide in-depth knowledge.