地理萎缩的自然史与治疗:到眼窝的时间

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Casey Zhang, Elias Kahan, Tedi Begaj, Scott M Friedman, Avnish Deobhakta, Michael Heyang, Liangbo Linus Shen, Darius Moshfeghi, Karen Wai, Ravi Parikh
{"title":"地理萎缩的自然史与治疗:到眼窝的时间","authors":"Casey Zhang, Elias Kahan, Tedi Begaj, Scott M Friedman, Avnish Deobhakta, Michael Heyang, Liangbo Linus Shen, Darius Moshfeghi, Karen Wai, Ravi Parikh","doi":"10.3928/23258160-20240418-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The Food and Drug Administration recently approved treatments of geographic atrophy (GA). Our study aims to quantify the time for a lesion to reach the central fovea based on reduction of GA growth rates from therapeutics compared to the natural history.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A previously published study calculates local border expansion rate of GA lesions at varying retinal eccentricities. In this study, we use these rates to model GA expansion toward the fovea and the effects of treatments that reduce growth in GA area by 15% to 45% on lesions of varying sizes with posterior margin 250, 500, 750, 1000, 1250, 1500, and 3000 µm from the fovea.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lesions with an area 8 mm<sup>2</sup> and posterior edge 500 µm from the fovea will reach the fovea in 5.08 years with no treatment, but the same lesions will reach the fovea in 5.85, 6.52, 7.36, and 8.46 years with a treatment that reduces growth in GA area by 15%, 25%, 35%, and 45%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Distance of the posterior edge of the lesion was the primary factor in GA growth toward the fovea, and lesion size only minimally affects growth rates of GA. Based on the efficacy of current and future therapeutics and distance of GA to the fovea, our study provides the marginal time benefit of treatment to guide patients and clinicians, placing both the natural history of GA and the effects of current and future treatments into clinical context. <b>[<i>Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina</i> 2024;55:576-585.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":19679,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina","volume":" ","pages":"576-585"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geographic Atrophy Natural History Versus Treatment: Time to Fovea.\",\"authors\":\"Casey Zhang, Elias Kahan, Tedi Begaj, Scott M Friedman, Avnish Deobhakta, Michael Heyang, Liangbo Linus Shen, Darius Moshfeghi, Karen Wai, Ravi Parikh\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/23258160-20240418-01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The Food and Drug Administration recently approved treatments of geographic atrophy (GA). Our study aims to quantify the time for a lesion to reach the central fovea based on reduction of GA growth rates from therapeutics compared to the natural history.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A previously published study calculates local border expansion rate of GA lesions at varying retinal eccentricities. In this study, we use these rates to model GA expansion toward the fovea and the effects of treatments that reduce growth in GA area by 15% to 45% on lesions of varying sizes with posterior margin 250, 500, 750, 1000, 1250, 1500, and 3000 µm from the fovea.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lesions with an area 8 mm<sup>2</sup> and posterior edge 500 µm from the fovea will reach the fovea in 5.08 years with no treatment, but the same lesions will reach the fovea in 5.85, 6.52, 7.36, and 8.46 years with a treatment that reduces growth in GA area by 15%, 25%, 35%, and 45%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Distance of the posterior edge of the lesion was the primary factor in GA growth toward the fovea, and lesion size only minimally affects growth rates of GA. Based on the efficacy of current and future therapeutics and distance of GA to the fovea, our study provides the marginal time benefit of treatment to guide patients and clinicians, placing both the natural history of GA and the effects of current and future treatments into clinical context. <b>[<i>Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina</i> 2024;55:576-585.]</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"576-585\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20240418-01\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20240418-01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:美国食品和药物管理局最近批准了治疗地理萎缩(GA)的药物。我们的研究旨在量化病变到达中心眼窝的时间,其依据是与自然病史相比,治疗方法降低了GA的生长速度:之前发表的一项研究计算了GA病变在不同视网膜偏心率下的局部边界扩展率。在本研究中,我们使用这些比率来模拟 GA 向眼窝的扩展,以及将 GA 面积增长减少 15%至 45%的治疗方法对不同大小病变的影响,这些病变的后缘距离眼窝分别为 250、500、750、1000、1250、1500 和 3000 µm:面积为 8 平方毫米、后缘距离眼窝 500 微米的病变,如果不进行治疗,将在 5.08 年后到达眼窝,但同样的病变,如果进行治疗,使 GA 面积的增长分别减少 15%、25%、35% 和 45%,则将在 5.85、6.52、7.36 和 8.46 年后到达眼窝:病变后缘的距离是GA向眼窝生长的主要因素,病变大小对GA生长率的影响微乎其微。根据目前和未来治疗方法的疗效以及GA与眼窝的距离,我们的研究提供了治疗的边际时间效益,为患者和临床医生提供了指导,将GA的自然史以及目前和未来治疗方法的效果纳入临床背景。[眼科手术激光成像视网膜2024;55:XX-XX]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Geographic Atrophy Natural History Versus Treatment: Time to Fovea.

Background and objective: The Food and Drug Administration recently approved treatments of geographic atrophy (GA). Our study aims to quantify the time for a lesion to reach the central fovea based on reduction of GA growth rates from therapeutics compared to the natural history.

Patients and methods: A previously published study calculates local border expansion rate of GA lesions at varying retinal eccentricities. In this study, we use these rates to model GA expansion toward the fovea and the effects of treatments that reduce growth in GA area by 15% to 45% on lesions of varying sizes with posterior margin 250, 500, 750, 1000, 1250, 1500, and 3000 µm from the fovea.

Results: Lesions with an area 8 mm2 and posterior edge 500 µm from the fovea will reach the fovea in 5.08 years with no treatment, but the same lesions will reach the fovea in 5.85, 6.52, 7.36, and 8.46 years with a treatment that reduces growth in GA area by 15%, 25%, 35%, and 45%, respectively.

Conclusions: Distance of the posterior edge of the lesion was the primary factor in GA growth toward the fovea, and lesion size only minimally affects growth rates of GA. Based on the efficacy of current and future therapeutics and distance of GA to the fovea, our study provides the marginal time benefit of treatment to guide patients and clinicians, placing both the natural history of GA and the effects of current and future treatments into clinical context. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2024;55:576-585.].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
期刊介绍: OSLI Retina focuses exclusively on retinal diseases, surgery and pharmacotherapy. OSLI Retina will offer an expedited submission to publication effort of peer-reviewed clinical science and case report articles. The front of the journal offers practical clinical and practice management features and columns specific to retina specialists. In sum, readers will find important peer-reviewed retina articles and the latest findings in techniques and science, as well as informative business and practice management features in one journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信