基于人群的与复发性拷贝数变异相关的精神疾病风险。

IF 22.5 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Morteza Vaez, Simone Montalbano, Xabier Calle Sánchez, Kajsa-Lotta Georgii Hellberg, Saeid Rasekhi Dehkordi, Morten Dybdahl Krebs, Joeri Meijsen, John Shorter, Jonas Bybjerg-Grauholm, Preben B Mortensen, Anders D Børglum, David M Hougaard, Merete Nordentoft, Daniel H Geschwind, Alfonso Buil, Andrew J Schork, Dorte Helenius, Armin Raznahan, Wesley K Thompson, Thomas Werge, Andrés Ingason
{"title":"基于人群的与复发性拷贝数变异相关的精神疾病风险。","authors":"Morteza Vaez, Simone Montalbano, Xabier Calle Sánchez, Kajsa-Lotta Georgii Hellberg, Saeid Rasekhi Dehkordi, Morten Dybdahl Krebs, Joeri Meijsen, John Shorter, Jonas Bybjerg-Grauholm, Preben B Mortensen, Anders D Børglum, David M Hougaard, Merete Nordentoft, Daniel H Geschwind, Alfonso Buil, Andrew J Schork, Dorte Helenius, Armin Raznahan, Wesley K Thompson, Thomas Werge, Andrés Ingason","doi":"10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.1453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Recurrent copy number variants (rCNVs) have been associated with increased risk of psychiatric disorders in case-control studies, but their population-level impact is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide unbiased population-based estimates of prevalence and risk associated with psychiatric disorders for rCNVs and to compare risks across outcomes, rCNV dosage type (deletions or duplications), and locus features.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This genetic association study is an analysis of data from the Lundbeck Foundation Initiative for Integrative Psychiatric Research (iPSYCH) case-cohort sample of individuals born in Denmark in 1981-2008 and followed up until 2015, including (1) all individuals (n = 92 531) with a hospital discharge diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder (MDD), or schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD) and (2) a subcohort (n = 50 625) randomly drawn from the source population. Data were analyzed from January 2021 to August 2023.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Carrier status of deletions and duplications at 27 autosomal rCNV loci was determined from neonatal blood samples genotyped on single-nucleotide variant microarrays.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Population-based rCNV prevalence was estimated with a survey model using finite population correction to account for oversampling of cases. Hazard ratio (HR) estimates and 95% CIs for psychiatric disorders were derived using weighted Cox proportional hazard models. Risks were compared across outcomes, dosage type, and locus features using generalized estimating equation models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3547 rCNVs were identified in 64 735 individuals assigned male at birth (53.8%) and 55 512 individuals assigned female at birth (46.2%) whose age at the end of follow-up ranged from 7.0 to 34.7 years (mean, 21.8 years). Most observed increases in rCNV-associated risk for ADHD, ASD, or SSD were moderate, and risk estimates were highly correlated across these disorders. Notable exceptions included high ASD-associated risk observed for Prader-Willi/Angelman syndrome duplications (HR, 20.8; 95% CI, 7.9-55). No rCNV was associated with increased MDD risk. Also, rCNV-associated risk was positively correlated with locus size and gene constraint but not with dosage type. Comparison with published case-control and community-based studies revealed a higher prevalence of deletions and lower associated increase in risk for several rCNVs in iPSYCH2015.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This study found that several rCNVs were more prevalent and conferred less risk of psychiatric disorders than estimated previously. Most case-control studies overestimate rCNV-associated risk of psychiatric disorders, likely because of selection bias. In an era where genetics is increasingly being clinically applied, these results highlight the importance of population-based risk estimates for genetics-based predictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":14800,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"957-966"},"PeriodicalIF":22.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11209205/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Population-Based Risk of Psychiatric Disorders Associated With Recurrent Copy Number Variants.\",\"authors\":\"Morteza Vaez, Simone Montalbano, Xabier Calle Sánchez, Kajsa-Lotta Georgii Hellberg, Saeid Rasekhi Dehkordi, Morten Dybdahl Krebs, Joeri Meijsen, John Shorter, Jonas Bybjerg-Grauholm, Preben B Mortensen, Anders D Børglum, David M Hougaard, Merete Nordentoft, Daniel H Geschwind, Alfonso Buil, Andrew J Schork, Dorte Helenius, Armin Raznahan, Wesley K Thompson, Thomas Werge, Andrés Ingason\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.1453\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Recurrent copy number variants (rCNVs) have been associated with increased risk of psychiatric disorders in case-control studies, but their population-level impact is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide unbiased population-based estimates of prevalence and risk associated with psychiatric disorders for rCNVs and to compare risks across outcomes, rCNV dosage type (deletions or duplications), and locus features.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This genetic association study is an analysis of data from the Lundbeck Foundation Initiative for Integrative Psychiatric Research (iPSYCH) case-cohort sample of individuals born in Denmark in 1981-2008 and followed up until 2015, including (1) all individuals (n = 92 531) with a hospital discharge diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder (MDD), or schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD) and (2) a subcohort (n = 50 625) randomly drawn from the source population. Data were analyzed from January 2021 to August 2023.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Carrier status of deletions and duplications at 27 autosomal rCNV loci was determined from neonatal blood samples genotyped on single-nucleotide variant microarrays.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Population-based rCNV prevalence was estimated with a survey model using finite population correction to account for oversampling of cases. Hazard ratio (HR) estimates and 95% CIs for psychiatric disorders were derived using weighted Cox proportional hazard models. Risks were compared across outcomes, dosage type, and locus features using generalized estimating equation models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3547 rCNVs were identified in 64 735 individuals assigned male at birth (53.8%) and 55 512 individuals assigned female at birth (46.2%) whose age at the end of follow-up ranged from 7.0 to 34.7 years (mean, 21.8 years). Most observed increases in rCNV-associated risk for ADHD, ASD, or SSD were moderate, and risk estimates were highly correlated across these disorders. Notable exceptions included high ASD-associated risk observed for Prader-Willi/Angelman syndrome duplications (HR, 20.8; 95% CI, 7.9-55). No rCNV was associated with increased MDD risk. Also, rCNV-associated risk was positively correlated with locus size and gene constraint but not with dosage type. Comparison with published case-control and community-based studies revealed a higher prevalence of deletions and lower associated increase in risk for several rCNVs in iPSYCH2015.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This study found that several rCNVs were more prevalent and conferred less risk of psychiatric disorders than estimated previously. Most case-control studies overestimate rCNV-associated risk of psychiatric disorders, likely because of selection bias. In an era where genetics is increasingly being clinically applied, these results highlight the importance of population-based risk estimates for genetics-based predictions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"957-966\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":22.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11209205/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.1453\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.1453","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:在病例对照研究中,复发性拷贝数变异(rCNVs)与精神疾病风险的增加有关,但其对人群的影响尚不清楚:目的:提供基于人群的rCNVs患病率和与精神障碍相关风险的无偏估计值,并比较不同结果、rCNV剂量类型(缺失或重复)和位点特征的风险:这项遗传关联研究分析了灵北基金会综合精神病学研究计划(iPSYCH)的病例队列样本数据,这些样本于 1981-2008 年间在丹麦出生,并随访至 2015 年、其中包括:(1)出院诊断为注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)、自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)、双相情感障碍、重度抑郁障碍(MDD)或精神分裂症谱系障碍(SSD)的所有患者(n = 92 531);(2)从源人群中随机抽取的子队列(n = 50 625)。数据分析时间为 2021 年 1 月至 2023 年 8 月:通过单核苷酸变异微阵列对新生儿血液样本进行基因分型,确定27个常染色体rCNV位点缺失和重复的携带者状态:采用调查模型估算基于人群的rCNV患病率,并使用有限人群校正以考虑病例的过度采样。使用加权 Cox 比例危险模型得出了精神疾病的危险比 (HR) 估计值和 95% CI。使用广义估计方程模型对不同结果、剂量类型和病位特征的风险进行了比较:在 64 735 名出生时被分配为男性(占 53.8%)和 55 512 名出生时被分配为女性(占 46.2%)的个体中,共发现了 3547 个 rCNV,这些个体在随访结束时的年龄在 7.0 岁到 34.7 岁之间(平均 21.8 岁)。大多数观察到的与rCNV相关的ADHD、ASD或SSD风险的增加是适度的,并且这些疾病的风险估计值高度相关。值得注意的例外情况包括观察到普拉德-威利/安杰尔曼综合征重复基因与 ASD 相关的高风险(HR,20.8;95% CI,7.9-55)。没有 rCNV 与 MDD 风险增加相关。此外,rCNV 相关风险与基因座大小和基因限制呈正相关,但与剂量类型无关。与已发表的病例对照研究和基于社区的研究相比,iPSYCH2015 中几种 rCNV 的缺失发生率较高,相关风险增加较低:本研究发现,与之前的估计相比,几种 rCNVs 的流行率更高,所带来的精神障碍风险更低。大多数病例对照研究都高估了与 rCNV 相关的精神疾病风险,这很可能是由于选择偏差造成的。在遗传学越来越多地被应用于临床的今天,这些结果凸显了基于人群的风险估计对于遗传学预测的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Population-Based Risk of Psychiatric Disorders Associated With Recurrent Copy Number Variants.

Importance: Recurrent copy number variants (rCNVs) have been associated with increased risk of psychiatric disorders in case-control studies, but their population-level impact is unknown.

Objective: To provide unbiased population-based estimates of prevalence and risk associated with psychiatric disorders for rCNVs and to compare risks across outcomes, rCNV dosage type (deletions or duplications), and locus features.

Design, setting, and participants: This genetic association study is an analysis of data from the Lundbeck Foundation Initiative for Integrative Psychiatric Research (iPSYCH) case-cohort sample of individuals born in Denmark in 1981-2008 and followed up until 2015, including (1) all individuals (n = 92 531) with a hospital discharge diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder (MDD), or schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD) and (2) a subcohort (n = 50 625) randomly drawn from the source population. Data were analyzed from January 2021 to August 2023.

Exposures: Carrier status of deletions and duplications at 27 autosomal rCNV loci was determined from neonatal blood samples genotyped on single-nucleotide variant microarrays.

Main outcomes and measures: Population-based rCNV prevalence was estimated with a survey model using finite population correction to account for oversampling of cases. Hazard ratio (HR) estimates and 95% CIs for psychiatric disorders were derived using weighted Cox proportional hazard models. Risks were compared across outcomes, dosage type, and locus features using generalized estimating equation models.

Results: A total of 3547 rCNVs were identified in 64 735 individuals assigned male at birth (53.8%) and 55 512 individuals assigned female at birth (46.2%) whose age at the end of follow-up ranged from 7.0 to 34.7 years (mean, 21.8 years). Most observed increases in rCNV-associated risk for ADHD, ASD, or SSD were moderate, and risk estimates were highly correlated across these disorders. Notable exceptions included high ASD-associated risk observed for Prader-Willi/Angelman syndrome duplications (HR, 20.8; 95% CI, 7.9-55). No rCNV was associated with increased MDD risk. Also, rCNV-associated risk was positively correlated with locus size and gene constraint but not with dosage type. Comparison with published case-control and community-based studies revealed a higher prevalence of deletions and lower associated increase in risk for several rCNVs in iPSYCH2015.

Conclusions and relevance: This study found that several rCNVs were more prevalent and conferred less risk of psychiatric disorders than estimated previously. Most case-control studies overestimate rCNV-associated risk of psychiatric disorders, likely because of selection bias. In an era where genetics is increasingly being clinically applied, these results highlight the importance of population-based risk estimates for genetics-based predictions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Psychiatry
JAMA Psychiatry PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
30.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
233
期刊介绍: JAMA Psychiatry is a global, peer-reviewed journal catering to clinicians, scholars, and research scientists in psychiatry, mental health, behavioral science, and related fields. The Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry originated in 1919, splitting into two journals in 1959: Archives of Neurology and Archives of General Psychiatry. In 2013, these evolved into JAMA Neurology and JAMA Psychiatry, respectively. JAMA Psychiatry is affiliated with the JAMA Network, a group of peer-reviewed medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信