虚拟访谈与精神病学住院医生的多样性。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Mohammad Lesanpezeshki, Lincoln Chifamba, Hannah Haynie, Natalie Bonfine, Randon S Welton
{"title":"虚拟访谈与精神病学住院医生的多样性。","authors":"Mohammad Lesanpezeshki, Lincoln Chifamba, Hannah Haynie, Natalie Bonfine, Randon S Welton","doi":"10.1007/s40596-024-01999-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Psychiatry residency program directors were surveyed regarding their impression of the impact virtual interviewing had on the perceived and actual diversity of individuals selected for interviews and residency training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A link to an anonymous survey was sent to 299 psychiatry residencies. Psychiatry program directors provided information about their programs and rated their perception of the impact of virtual interviewing on candidates they interviewed and matched. They also reported the demographic information of incoming residency classes for 2020-2023. This data was assessed for differences in the average number of residents by each diversity category and interview format (i.e., in person or virtual) and between diversity categories and cohorts. A linear trend analysis assessed whether the number of residents in each demographic category had a significant change over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-five program directors (21.7%) provided at least partial data. Half of the responding program directors believed that virtual interviewing had increased the diversity of interviewed applicants, but there were no statistically significant differences in the average number of incoming residents who were identified as women or were in an Underrepresented in Medicine category when comparing the in-person interview year (2020) and the virtual interview years (2021-2023).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The analyzed data demonstrated that the type of interview (in-person vs virtual) did not appear to affect the diversity of incoming psychiatry residents. Ongoing efforts to increase diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging should be paired with measurements of their impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":7069,"journal":{"name":"Academic Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Virtual Interviewing and Diversity Among Psychiatry Residents.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Lesanpezeshki, Lincoln Chifamba, Hannah Haynie, Natalie Bonfine, Randon S Welton\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40596-024-01999-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Psychiatry residency program directors were surveyed regarding their impression of the impact virtual interviewing had on the perceived and actual diversity of individuals selected for interviews and residency training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A link to an anonymous survey was sent to 299 psychiatry residencies. Psychiatry program directors provided information about their programs and rated their perception of the impact of virtual interviewing on candidates they interviewed and matched. They also reported the demographic information of incoming residency classes for 2020-2023. This data was assessed for differences in the average number of residents by each diversity category and interview format (i.e., in person or virtual) and between diversity categories and cohorts. A linear trend analysis assessed whether the number of residents in each demographic category had a significant change over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-five program directors (21.7%) provided at least partial data. Half of the responding program directors believed that virtual interviewing had increased the diversity of interviewed applicants, but there were no statistically significant differences in the average number of incoming residents who were identified as women or were in an Underrepresented in Medicine category when comparing the in-person interview year (2020) and the virtual interview years (2021-2023).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The analyzed data demonstrated that the type of interview (in-person vs virtual) did not appear to affect the diversity of incoming psychiatry residents. Ongoing efforts to increase diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging should be paired with measurements of their impact.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-024-01999-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-024-01999-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的调查精神病学住院医师培训项目主任对虚拟面试对面试和住院医师培训所选人员的感知和实际多样性的影响的印象:向 299 个精神病学住院医师项目发送了匿名调查链接。精神病学项目主任提供了有关他们项目的信息,并对虚拟面试对他们面试和匹配的候选人的影响进行了评价。他们还报告了 2020-2023 年即将入学的住院医师班级的人口统计信息。我们对这些数据进行了评估,以确定每个多样性类别和面试形式(即亲自面试还是虚拟面试)以及多样性类别和组群之间住院医师平均人数的差异。线性趋势分析评估了各人口统计类别中的住院医师人数是否随时间推移而发生显著变化:65位项目主任(21.7%)至少提供了部分数据。半数做出回复的项目主任认为,虚拟面试增加了面试申请人的多样性,但在比较亲自面试年(2020 年)和虚拟面试年(2021-2023 年)时,被认定为女性或属于医学领域代表性不足类别的新入职住院医师的平均人数在统计学上没有显著差异:分析数据表明,面试类型(面对面面试与虚拟面试)似乎不会影响新入职精神病学住院医师的多样性。在不断努力提高多样性、公平性、包容性和归属感的同时,还应衡量其影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Virtual Interviewing and Diversity Among Psychiatry Residents.

Objective: Psychiatry residency program directors were surveyed regarding their impression of the impact virtual interviewing had on the perceived and actual diversity of individuals selected for interviews and residency training.

Methods: A link to an anonymous survey was sent to 299 psychiatry residencies. Psychiatry program directors provided information about their programs and rated their perception of the impact of virtual interviewing on candidates they interviewed and matched. They also reported the demographic information of incoming residency classes for 2020-2023. This data was assessed for differences in the average number of residents by each diversity category and interview format (i.e., in person or virtual) and between diversity categories and cohorts. A linear trend analysis assessed whether the number of residents in each demographic category had a significant change over time.

Results: Sixty-five program directors (21.7%) provided at least partial data. Half of the responding program directors believed that virtual interviewing had increased the diversity of interviewed applicants, but there were no statistically significant differences in the average number of incoming residents who were identified as women or were in an Underrepresented in Medicine category when comparing the in-person interview year (2020) and the virtual interview years (2021-2023).

Conclusions: The analyzed data demonstrated that the type of interview (in-person vs virtual) did not appear to affect the diversity of incoming psychiatry residents. Ongoing efforts to increase diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging should be paired with measurements of their impact.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
157
期刊介绍: Academic Psychiatry is the international journal of the American Association of Chairs of Departments of Psychiatry, American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training, Association for Academic Psychiatry, and Association of Directors of Medical Student Education in Psychiatry. Academic Psychiatry publishes original, scholarly work in psychiatry and the behavioral sciences that focuses on innovative education, academic leadership, and advocacy. The scope of the journal includes work that furthers knowledge and stimulates evidence-based advances in academic psychiatry in the following domains: education and training, leadership and administration, career and professional development, ethics and professionalism, and health and well-being.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信