Fomes weberianus，50 年来分类学上的困惑：标本分型和分类学说明。

IF 5.2 1区生物学 Q1 MYCOLOGY

Ima Fungus Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1186/s43008-024-00148-7

Cony Decock, Milay Cabarroi-Hernández, Laura Guzmán-Dávalos, Paul M Kirk, José Ángel García-Beltrán, Mario Amalfi

{"title":"Fomes weberianus，50 年来分类学上的困惑：标本分型和分类学说明。","authors":"Cony Decock, Milay Cabarroi-Hernández, Laura Guzmán-Dávalos, Paul M Kirk, José Ángel García-Beltrán, Mario Amalfi","doi":"10.1186/s43008-024-00148-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fomes weberianus Bres. & Henn. ex Sacc. is currently the basionym of two very distinct polypores (Basidiomycota), Ganoderma weberianum (Polyporales) and Phylloporia weberiana (Hymenochaetales). This fact has led to almost fifty years of taxonomic confusion. Fomes weberianus was first lectotypified by Steyaert, who accepted the species as G. weberianum. However, studies of Weber's original material in B, duplicate material in S, the protologue, and early interpretations of the name have shown that Steyaert's choice conflicts with the protologue and early interpretations, and that his interpretation as a species of Ganoderma is erroneous. A new lectotype was designated and the species was re-described under the correct interpretation Phylloporia weberiana.","PeriodicalId":54345,"journal":{"name":"Ima Fungus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11194980/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fomes weberianus, 50 years of taxonomic confusion: lectotypification and taxonomic notes.\",\"authors\":\"Cony Decock, Milay Cabarroi-Hernández, Laura Guzmán-Dávalos, Paul M Kirk, José Ángel García-Beltrán, Mario Amalfi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s43008-024-00148-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fomes weberianus Bres. & Henn. ex Sacc. is currently the basionym of two very distinct polypores (Basidiomycota), Ganoderma weberianum (Polyporales) and Phylloporia weberiana (Hymenochaetales). This fact has led to almost fifty years of taxonomic confusion. Fomes weberianus was first lectotypified by Steyaert, who accepted the species as G. weberianum. However, studies of Weber's original material in B, duplicate material in S, the protologue, and early interpretations of the name have shown that Steyaert's choice conflicts with the protologue and early interpretations, and that his interpretation as a species of Ganoderma is erroneous. A new lectotype was designated and the species was re-described under the correct interpretation Phylloporia weberiana.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54345,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ima Fungus\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11194980/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ima Fungus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43008-024-00148-7\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MYCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ima Fungus","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43008-024-00148-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MYCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

Fomes weberianus Bres. & Henn. ex Sacc.目前是两种非常不同的多孔菌（基原真菌纲）--Ganoderma weberianum（多孔菌目）和 Phylloporia weberiana（半知菌目）--的基名。这一事实导致了近 50 年的分类混乱。Fomes weberianus 最早由 Steyaert 进行了分型，他将该物种认定为 G. weberianum。然而，对韦伯在 B 中的原始材料、在 S 中的重复材料、原型和对该名称的早期解释的研究表明，Steyaert 的选择与原型和早期解释相冲突，他将其解释为灵芝的一个种是错误的。因此指定了一个新的主模式，并以正确的解释 Phylloporia weberiana 重新描述了该物种。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Fomes weberianus, 50 years of taxonomic confusion: lectotypification and taxonomic notes.

Fomes weberianus Bres. & Henn. ex Sacc. is currently the basionym of two very distinct polypores (Basidiomycota), Ganoderma weberianum (Polyporales) and Phylloporia weberiana (Hymenochaetales). This fact has led to almost fifty years of taxonomic confusion. Fomes weberianus was first lectotypified by Steyaert, who accepted the species as G. weberianum. However, studies of Weber's original material in B, duplicate material in S, the protologue, and early interpretations of the name have shown that Steyaert's choice conflicts with the protologue and early interpretations, and that his interpretation as a species of Ganoderma is erroneous. A new lectotype was designated and the species was re-described under the correct interpretation Phylloporia weberiana.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Ima Fungus Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)

CiteScore

11.00

自引率

3.70%

发文量

审稿时长

20 weeks

期刊介绍： The flagship journal of the International Mycological Association. IMA Fungus is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, full colour, fast-track journal. Papers on any aspect of mycology are considered, and published on-line with final pagination after proofs have been corrected; they are then effectively published under the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants. The journal strongly supports good practice policies, and requires voucher specimens or cultures to be deposited in a public collection with an online database, DNA sequences in GenBank, alignments in TreeBASE, and validating information on new scientific names, including typifications, to be lodged in MycoBank. News, meeting reports, personalia, research news, correspondence, book news, and information on forthcoming international meetings are included in each issue