在 COVID-19 期间使用或不使用远程医疗持续气道正压治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的患者体验:定性方法。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Tracy A Jones, Jenny Roddis, Rebecca Stores
{"title":"在 COVID-19 期间使用或不使用远程医疗持续气道正压治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的患者体验:定性方法。","authors":"Tracy A Jones, Jenny Roddis, Rebecca Stores","doi":"10.5664/jcsm.11266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is considered effective treatment for moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Clinicians measure adherence to treatment by the number of hours CPAP is used per 24 hours. There have been very few studies examining the patients' lived experience of CPAP and the barriers to use. This study examined the patients' experience of OSA, CPAP use and treatment during COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This CPAP patient experience qualitative study was part of a larger project. The overarching study was a 3-armed nonblinded randomized controlled trial of patients on CPAP for treatment of OSA using standard care or 1 of 2 telemedicine interventions. Patients who had completed the randomized controlled trial study were invited to be interviewed via telephone, about their OSA diagnosis, CPAP experiences, their experience of using telemedicine, and the impact of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen patients (5 from each arm of the trial) took part in a semistructured interview. Thematic analysis identified 3 themes: day to day living, standard hospital care vs telemedicine management, and living through COVID-19 with CPAP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All participants described significant symptoms caused by their OSA before diagnosis. Although CPAP treatment was often described as challenging, patients discussed the improvement in their symptoms with treatment. There were differing opinions on virtual appointments; however, the consensus was the use of telemedicine to support CPAP treatment was well received. COVID-19 appeared to have little effect on the patient experience.</p><p><strong>Citation: </strong>Jones TA, Roddis J, Stores R. Patient experience of the use of continuous positive airway pressure for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea with or without telemedicine during COVID-19: a qualitative approach. <i>J Clin Sleep Med</i>. 2024;20(11):1739-1748.</p>","PeriodicalId":50233,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1739-1748"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11530982/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient experience of the use of continuous positive airway pressure for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea with or without telemedicine during COVID-19: a qualitative approach.\",\"authors\":\"Tracy A Jones, Jenny Roddis, Rebecca Stores\",\"doi\":\"10.5664/jcsm.11266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is considered effective treatment for moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Clinicians measure adherence to treatment by the number of hours CPAP is used per 24 hours. There have been very few studies examining the patients' lived experience of CPAP and the barriers to use. This study examined the patients' experience of OSA, CPAP use and treatment during COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This CPAP patient experience qualitative study was part of a larger project. The overarching study was a 3-armed nonblinded randomized controlled trial of patients on CPAP for treatment of OSA using standard care or 1 of 2 telemedicine interventions. Patients who had completed the randomized controlled trial study were invited to be interviewed via telephone, about their OSA diagnosis, CPAP experiences, their experience of using telemedicine, and the impact of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen patients (5 from each arm of the trial) took part in a semistructured interview. Thematic analysis identified 3 themes: day to day living, standard hospital care vs telemedicine management, and living through COVID-19 with CPAP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All participants described significant symptoms caused by their OSA before diagnosis. Although CPAP treatment was often described as challenging, patients discussed the improvement in their symptoms with treatment. There were differing opinions on virtual appointments; however, the consensus was the use of telemedicine to support CPAP treatment was well received. COVID-19 appeared to have little effect on the patient experience.</p><p><strong>Citation: </strong>Jones TA, Roddis J, Stores R. Patient experience of the use of continuous positive airway pressure for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea with or without telemedicine during COVID-19: a qualitative approach. <i>J Clin Sleep Med</i>. 2024;20(11):1739-1748.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1739-1748\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11530982/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.11266\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.11266","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的:持续气道正压(CPAP)被认为是治疗中重度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的有效方法。临床医生通过每 24 小时使用 CPAP 的小时数来衡量治疗的依从性。有关患者使用 CPAP 的生活体验和使用障碍的研究很少。本研究考察了患者在 COVID-19 期间对 OSA、CPAP 使用和治疗的体验:这项 CPAP 患者体验定性研究是一个大型项目的一部分。总体研究是一项三臂非盲法随机对照试验,对使用 CPAP 治疗 OSA 的患者进行标准护理或两种远程医疗干预中的一种。完成 RCT 研究的患者受邀通过电话接受采访,了解他们的 OSA 诊断、CPAP 经验、使用远程医疗的经验以及 SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) 的影响:15 名患者(试验组各 5 名)参加了半结构化访谈。主题分析确定了三个主题:日常生活、标准医院护理与远程医疗管理以及使用 CPAP 在 COVID-19 中生活:所有参与者在确诊前都描述了 OSA 引起的严重症状。虽然 CPAP 治疗经常被描述为具有挑战性,但患者讨论了治疗后症状的改善情况。对虚拟预约的看法不一,但一致认为使用远程医疗支持 CPAP 治疗受到好评。COVID-19 似乎对患者的体验影响不大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient experience of the use of continuous positive airway pressure for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea with or without telemedicine during COVID-19: a qualitative approach.

Study objectives: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is considered effective treatment for moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Clinicians measure adherence to treatment by the number of hours CPAP is used per 24 hours. There have been very few studies examining the patients' lived experience of CPAP and the barriers to use. This study examined the patients' experience of OSA, CPAP use and treatment during COVID-19.

Methods: This CPAP patient experience qualitative study was part of a larger project. The overarching study was a 3-armed nonblinded randomized controlled trial of patients on CPAP for treatment of OSA using standard care or 1 of 2 telemedicine interventions. Patients who had completed the randomized controlled trial study were invited to be interviewed via telephone, about their OSA diagnosis, CPAP experiences, their experience of using telemedicine, and the impact of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19).

Results: Fifteen patients (5 from each arm of the trial) took part in a semistructured interview. Thematic analysis identified 3 themes: day to day living, standard hospital care vs telemedicine management, and living through COVID-19 with CPAP.

Conclusions: All participants described significant symptoms caused by their OSA before diagnosis. Although CPAP treatment was often described as challenging, patients discussed the improvement in their symptoms with treatment. There were differing opinions on virtual appointments; however, the consensus was the use of telemedicine to support CPAP treatment was well received. COVID-19 appeared to have little effect on the patient experience.

Citation: Jones TA, Roddis J, Stores R. Patient experience of the use of continuous positive airway pressure for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea with or without telemedicine during COVID-19: a qualitative approach. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(11):1739-1748.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
7.00%
发文量
321
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine focuses on clinical sleep medicine. Its emphasis is publication of papers with direct applicability and/or relevance to the clinical practice of sleep medicine. This includes clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical commentary and debate, medical economic/practice perspectives, case series and novel/interesting case reports. In addition, the journal will publish proceedings from conferences, workshops and symposia sponsored by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine or other organizations related to improving the practice of sleep medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信