{"title":"Lapidus 拇趾外翻切除术后的二次手术。","authors":"","doi":"10.1053/j.jfas.2024.05.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While the Lapidus bunionectomy is a common procedure utilized to address hallux valgus, the incidence of secondary surgery is not well established. Our primary goal was to determine the incidence of revision surgery and hardware removal following the Lapidus bunionectomy in addition to the risk factors associated with each. A retrospective nested case-control study of adult patients who underwent a Lapidus bunionectomy for symptomatic hallux valgus over a 9-year period was performed. The incidence rates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of secondary surgery in the 3 years following the procedure along with the estimated independent associations and odds ratios between baseline demographic, clinical, and radiographic characteristics were calculated. Of the original cohort of 2540 patients, 127 were identified (5.0%; CI: 4.1%, 5.8%) who underwent revision surgery and 165 (6.5%; CI: 5.5%, 7.5%) who underwent hardware removal following Lapidus bunionectomy. Initially, the hallux valgus angle, intermetatarsal angle, and tibial sesamoid position were risk factors for revision surgery. However, in adjusted analyses for revision surgery, using a screw for third point of fixation emerged as the only independent risk factor (odds ratio [OR] = 3.01; CI: 1.59, 5.69). In adjusted analyses for hardware removal, female sex (OR = 2.33; CI: 1.08, 5.00) and third point of fixation (OR = 2.92; CI: 1.82, 4.69) emerged as independent risk factors. While the overall risks associated with Lapidus bunionectomy are low and the need for revision surgery are low, this study helps to identify specific risk factors for secondary surgery and hardware removal to help in evaluation and discussion with patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","volume":"63 6","pages":"Pages 653-660"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Secondary Surgery Following Lapidus Bunionectomy\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.jfas.2024.05.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>While the Lapidus bunionectomy is a common procedure utilized to address hallux valgus, the incidence of secondary surgery is not well established. Our primary goal was to determine the incidence of revision surgery and hardware removal following the Lapidus bunionectomy in addition to the risk factors associated with each. A retrospective nested case-control study of adult patients who underwent a Lapidus bunionectomy for symptomatic hallux valgus over a 9-year period was performed. The incidence rates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of secondary surgery in the 3 years following the procedure along with the estimated independent associations and odds ratios between baseline demographic, clinical, and radiographic characteristics were calculated. Of the original cohort of 2540 patients, 127 were identified (5.0%; CI: 4.1%, 5.8%) who underwent revision surgery and 165 (6.5%; CI: 5.5%, 7.5%) who underwent hardware removal following Lapidus bunionectomy. Initially, the hallux valgus angle, intermetatarsal angle, and tibial sesamoid position were risk factors for revision surgery. However, in adjusted analyses for revision surgery, using a screw for third point of fixation emerged as the only independent risk factor (odds ratio [OR] = 3.01; CI: 1.59, 5.69). In adjusted analyses for hardware removal, female sex (OR = 2.33; CI: 1.08, 5.00) and third point of fixation (OR = 2.92; CI: 1.82, 4.69) emerged as independent risk factors. While the overall risks associated with Lapidus bunionectomy are low and the need for revision surgery are low, this study helps to identify specific risk factors for secondary surgery and hardware removal to help in evaluation and discussion with patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery\",\"volume\":\"63 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 653-660\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1067251624001145\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1067251624001145","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
While the Lapidus bunionectomy is a common procedure utilized to address hallux valgus, the incidence of secondary surgery is not well established. Our primary goal was to determine the incidence of revision surgery and hardware removal following the Lapidus bunionectomy in addition to the risk factors associated with each. A retrospective nested case-control study of adult patients who underwent a Lapidus bunionectomy for symptomatic hallux valgus over a 9-year period was performed. The incidence rates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of secondary surgery in the 3 years following the procedure along with the estimated independent associations and odds ratios between baseline demographic, clinical, and radiographic characteristics were calculated. Of the original cohort of 2540 patients, 127 were identified (5.0%; CI: 4.1%, 5.8%) who underwent revision surgery and 165 (6.5%; CI: 5.5%, 7.5%) who underwent hardware removal following Lapidus bunionectomy. Initially, the hallux valgus angle, intermetatarsal angle, and tibial sesamoid position were risk factors for revision surgery. However, in adjusted analyses for revision surgery, using a screw for third point of fixation emerged as the only independent risk factor (odds ratio [OR] = 3.01; CI: 1.59, 5.69). In adjusted analyses for hardware removal, female sex (OR = 2.33; CI: 1.08, 5.00) and third point of fixation (OR = 2.92; CI: 1.82, 4.69) emerged as independent risk factors. While the overall risks associated with Lapidus bunionectomy are low and the need for revision surgery are low, this study helps to identify specific risk factors for secondary surgery and hardware removal to help in evaluation and discussion with patients.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery is the leading source for original, clinically-focused articles on the surgical and medical management of the foot and ankle. Each bi-monthly, peer-reviewed issue addresses relevant topics to the profession, such as: adult reconstruction of the forefoot; adult reconstruction of the hindfoot and ankle; diabetes; medicine/rheumatology; pediatrics; research; sports medicine; trauma; and tumors.