成人脊柱畸形患者理想的腰椎后凸矫正,不会对骨盆后倾和骨盆入射减去腰椎后凸造成不利影响:426 个病例的研究。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2025-05-15 Epub Date: 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005077
Se-Jun Park, Jin-Sung Park, Dong-Ho Kang, Chong-Suh Lee
{"title":"成人脊柱畸形患者理想的腰椎后凸矫正,不会对骨盆后倾和骨盆入射减去腰椎后凸造成不利影响:426 个病例的研究。","authors":"Se-Jun Park, Jin-Sung Park, Dong-Ho Kang, Chong-Suh Lee","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the ideal pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) range to prevent pelvic tilt (PT) undercorrection while avoiding PI-LL overcorrection following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.</p><p><strong>Summary of background: </strong>PI-LL and PT are the important sagittal parameters to be restored to an adequate range by surgery. Ideal PI-LL target without causing PI-LL overcorrection and PT undercorrection has not been documented.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients with ASD undergoing ≥5-level fusion, including the sacrum. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to calculate the lower limit of the ideal PI-LL without causing PI-LL overcorrection and the upper limit of the ideal PI-LL without causing PT undercorrection. The calculated ideal PI-LL was validated in terms of proximal junctional kyphosis and failure (PJK and PJF) rates and clinical outcomes. Analyses were performed according to age subgroups (below 70 and 70 yr or above).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 426 patients were included in the study. Female patients were predominant (85.4%), with a mean age of 69.8 years. The lower limits of PI-LL were calculated as 4.9° for all patients, 2.3° for patients aged below 70 years, and 7.9° for patients aged 70 years or above. Meanwhile, the upper limits of PI-LL were calculated as 12.7° for all patients, 12.5° for patients aged below 70 years, and 13.3° for patients aged 70 years or above. There were no significant differences in the PJK and PJF rates among the new three PI-LL groups. Clinical outcomes were significantly better in patients with the ideal PI-LL group than those in patients with overcorrection or undercorrection groups for all age groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ideal PI-LL correction target without adversely impacting PT and PI-LL was calculated at 2.3° to 12.5° for patients aged below 70 years and 7.9° to 13.3° for patients aged 70 years or above. These guideline parameters may help ensure optimal clinical outcomes without increasing the risk of PJK/F.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":"694-701"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ideal Lumbar Lordosis Correction in Patients With Adult Spinal Deformity Without Adversely Impacting Pelvic Tilt and Pelvic Incidence Minus Lumbar Lordosis: A Study of 426 Cases.\",\"authors\":\"Se-Jun Park, Jin-Sung Park, Dong-Ho Kang, Chong-Suh Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the ideal pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) range to prevent pelvic tilt (PT) undercorrection while avoiding PI-LL overcorrection following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.</p><p><strong>Summary of background: </strong>PI-LL and PT are the important sagittal parameters to be restored to an adequate range by surgery. Ideal PI-LL target without causing PI-LL overcorrection and PT undercorrection has not been documented.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients with ASD undergoing ≥5-level fusion, including the sacrum. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to calculate the lower limit of the ideal PI-LL without causing PI-LL overcorrection and the upper limit of the ideal PI-LL without causing PT undercorrection. The calculated ideal PI-LL was validated in terms of proximal junctional kyphosis and failure (PJK and PJF) rates and clinical outcomes. Analyses were performed according to age subgroups (below 70 and 70 yr or above).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 426 patients were included in the study. Female patients were predominant (85.4%), with a mean age of 69.8 years. The lower limits of PI-LL were calculated as 4.9° for all patients, 2.3° for patients aged below 70 years, and 7.9° for patients aged 70 years or above. Meanwhile, the upper limits of PI-LL were calculated as 12.7° for all patients, 12.5° for patients aged below 70 years, and 13.3° for patients aged 70 years or above. There were no significant differences in the PJK and PJF rates among the new three PI-LL groups. Clinical outcomes were significantly better in patients with the ideal PI-LL group than those in patients with overcorrection or undercorrection groups for all age groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ideal PI-LL correction target without adversely impacting PT and PI-LL was calculated at 2.3° to 12.5° for patients aged below 70 years and 7.9° to 13.3° for patients aged 70 years or above. These guideline parameters may help ensure optimal clinical outcomes without increasing the risk of PJK/F.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"694-701\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005077\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005077","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计回顾性研究:确定理想的骨盆内陷(PI)-腰椎前凸(LL)范围,以防止成人脊柱畸形(ASD)手术后骨盆倾斜(PT)矫正不足,同时避免PI-LL矫正过度:背景概述:PI-LL 和 PT 是通过手术恢复到适当范围的重要矢状面参数。理想的PI-LL目标不会导致PI-LL过度矫正和PT矫正不足,这一点尚未得到证实:我们纳入了接受包括骶骨在内的≥5级融合术的ASD患者。方法:我们纳入了接受包括骶骨在内的≥5级融合术的ASD患者,并进行了接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析,以计算出不导致PI-LL过度矫正的理想PI-LL下限和不导致PT不足矫正的理想PI-LL上限。计算出的理想 PI-LL 在近端交界脊柱侧弯率和失败率(PJK 和 PJF)以及临床结果方面进行了验证。根据年龄分组进行了分析(结果:研究共纳入 426 名患者。女性患者占多数(85.4%),平均年龄为 69.8 岁。经计算,所有患者的 PI-LL 下限为 4.9°,年龄为 2.3°:在不对 PT 和 PI-LL 产生不利影响的情况下,计算得出的理想 PI-LL 矫正目标为 2.3°-12.5°,适用于高龄患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ideal Lumbar Lordosis Correction in Patients With Adult Spinal Deformity Without Adversely Impacting Pelvic Tilt and Pelvic Incidence Minus Lumbar Lordosis: A Study of 426 Cases.

Study design: Retrospective study.

Objectives: To determine the ideal pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) range to prevent pelvic tilt (PT) undercorrection while avoiding PI-LL overcorrection following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.

Summary of background: PI-LL and PT are the important sagittal parameters to be restored to an adequate range by surgery. Ideal PI-LL target without causing PI-LL overcorrection and PT undercorrection has not been documented.

Methods: We included patients with ASD undergoing ≥5-level fusion, including the sacrum. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to calculate the lower limit of the ideal PI-LL without causing PI-LL overcorrection and the upper limit of the ideal PI-LL without causing PT undercorrection. The calculated ideal PI-LL was validated in terms of proximal junctional kyphosis and failure (PJK and PJF) rates and clinical outcomes. Analyses were performed according to age subgroups (below 70 and 70 yr or above).

Results: In total, 426 patients were included in the study. Female patients were predominant (85.4%), with a mean age of 69.8 years. The lower limits of PI-LL were calculated as 4.9° for all patients, 2.3° for patients aged below 70 years, and 7.9° for patients aged 70 years or above. Meanwhile, the upper limits of PI-LL were calculated as 12.7° for all patients, 12.5° for patients aged below 70 years, and 13.3° for patients aged 70 years or above. There were no significant differences in the PJK and PJF rates among the new three PI-LL groups. Clinical outcomes were significantly better in patients with the ideal PI-LL group than those in patients with overcorrection or undercorrection groups for all age groups.

Conclusions: The ideal PI-LL correction target without adversely impacting PT and PI-LL was calculated at 2.3° to 12.5° for patients aged below 70 years and 7.9° to 13.3° for patients aged 70 years or above. These guideline parameters may help ensure optimal clinical outcomes without increasing the risk of PJK/F.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信