重复使用白内障手术材料:潜在污染评估。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Aakriti Garg Shukla, David F Chang, Thamizhselvi Dhanaseelan, Vellam Ramakrishnan Vivekanandan, Joseph Gubert, Alan L Robin, Rengaraj Venkatesh
{"title":"重复使用白内障手术材料:潜在污染评估。","authors":"Aakriti Garg Shukla, David F Chang, Thamizhselvi Dhanaseelan, Vellam Ramakrishnan Vivekanandan, Joseph Gubert, Alan L Robin, Rengaraj Venkatesh","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate microbiological cultures of cataract surgical devices and products that were reused for multiple cases.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Aravind Eye Hospital, Pondicherry, Tamil Nadu, India.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Samples from multiple surgical instruments and products that were reused for consecutive cataract surgeries underwent bacterial and fungal cultures and were monitored alongside positive controls for 7 days. This included instruments that were processed using immediate use steam sterilization (IUSS) between cases (eg, surgical cannulas, syringes, phacoemulsification and coaxial/bimanual irrigation/aspiration [I/A] tips, phacoemulsification and I/A sleeves) (Group 1), instruments that were used without sterilization between cases (eg, phacoemulsification tubing/handpieces, coaxial I/A handpieces) (Group 2), and the residual (unused) fluid from balanced salt solution bags after being used for multiple patients (Group 3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>3333 discrete samples were collected from all 3 product groups that were reused across multiple patients. In all collected samples, no bacterial or fungal growth was observed. Of the 3241 cataract surgeries that used reused and IUSS-sterilized instruments alongside instrument sets cultured on the same day and balanced salt solution bags shared across multiple patients, no eyes developed endophthalmitis over a 6-week follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bacterial or fungal growth was not found in extensive microbiological cultures of IUSS-sterilized ophthalmic surgical instruments and cataract surgical products that were reused in multiple patients. This microbiological data complements clinical endophthalmitis data from 2 million consecutive cases at the Aravind Eye Hospital, suggesting that their instrument and surgical supply processing practices may allow for safe and sustainable ophthalmic care.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"993-999"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reusing surgical materials for cataract surgery: an assessment of potential contamination.\",\"authors\":\"Aakriti Garg Shukla, David F Chang, Thamizhselvi Dhanaseelan, Vellam Ramakrishnan Vivekanandan, Joseph Gubert, Alan L Robin, Rengaraj Venkatesh\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001509\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate microbiological cultures of cataract surgical devices and products that were reused for multiple cases.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Aravind Eye Hospital, Pondicherry, Tamil Nadu, India.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Samples from multiple surgical instruments and products that were reused for consecutive cataract surgeries underwent bacterial and fungal cultures and were monitored alongside positive controls for 7 days. This included instruments that were processed using immediate use steam sterilization (IUSS) between cases (eg, surgical cannulas, syringes, phacoemulsification and coaxial/bimanual irrigation/aspiration [I/A] tips, phacoemulsification and I/A sleeves) (Group 1), instruments that were used without sterilization between cases (eg, phacoemulsification tubing/handpieces, coaxial I/A handpieces) (Group 2), and the residual (unused) fluid from balanced salt solution bags after being used for multiple patients (Group 3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>3333 discrete samples were collected from all 3 product groups that were reused across multiple patients. In all collected samples, no bacterial or fungal growth was observed. Of the 3241 cataract surgeries that used reused and IUSS-sterilized instruments alongside instrument sets cultured on the same day and balanced salt solution bags shared across multiple patients, no eyes developed endophthalmitis over a 6-week follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bacterial or fungal growth was not found in extensive microbiological cultures of IUSS-sterilized ophthalmic surgical instruments and cataract surgical products that were reused in multiple patients. This microbiological data complements clinical endophthalmitis data from 2 million consecutive cases at the Aravind Eye Hospital, suggesting that their instrument and surgical supply processing practices may allow for safe and sustainable ophthalmic care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"993-999\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001509\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001509","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估多次重复使用的白内障手术设备和产品的微生物培养情况:地点: 印度泰米尔纳德邦本迪榭里的 Aravind 眼科医院:设计:前瞻性队列研究:连续白内障手术中重复使用的多个手术器械和产品样本进行细菌和真菌培养,并与阳性对照一起监测 7 天。这包括病例间使用即时使用蒸汽灭菌(IUSS)处理的器械(如手术套管、注射器、超声乳化和同轴/纤支镜灌洗和抽吸(IA)吸头、超声乳化和 IA 套管)(第 1 组)、病例间未经灭菌使用的器械(如超声乳化管/手柄)(第 2 组)、病例间未经灭菌使用的器械(如超声乳化管/手柄)(第 3 组)和病例间未经灭菌使用的器械(如超声乳化管/手柄)(第 4 组)、乳化管/手机、同轴 IA 手机)(第 2 组),以及平衡盐溶液袋中供多名患者使用后的残留(未使用)液体(第 3 组):从所有 3 组产品中收集了 3,333 份在多名患者身上重复使用的离散样本。在所有采集的样本中,均未发现细菌或真菌生长。在 3,241 例白内障手术中,使用了重复使用并经过 IUSS 消毒的器械,以及在同一天培养的器械套件和多名患者共用的平衡盐溶液袋,在 6 周的随访期内,没有一双眼睛发生眼内炎:结论:经 IUSS 消毒的眼科手术器械和多个患者重复使用的白内障手术产品的大量微生物培养中未发现细菌或真菌生长。这些微生物数据补充了 Aravind 眼科医院连续 200 万例眼底病的临床数据,表明他们的器械和手术用品处理方法可以实现安全、可持续的眼科护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reusing surgical materials for cataract surgery: an assessment of potential contamination.

Purpose: To evaluate microbiological cultures of cataract surgical devices and products that were reused for multiple cases.

Setting: Aravind Eye Hospital, Pondicherry, Tamil Nadu, India.

Design: Prospective cohort study.

Methods: Samples from multiple surgical instruments and products that were reused for consecutive cataract surgeries underwent bacterial and fungal cultures and were monitored alongside positive controls for 7 days. This included instruments that were processed using immediate use steam sterilization (IUSS) between cases (eg, surgical cannulas, syringes, phacoemulsification and coaxial/bimanual irrigation/aspiration [I/A] tips, phacoemulsification and I/A sleeves) (Group 1), instruments that were used without sterilization between cases (eg, phacoemulsification tubing/handpieces, coaxial I/A handpieces) (Group 2), and the residual (unused) fluid from balanced salt solution bags after being used for multiple patients (Group 3).

Results: 3333 discrete samples were collected from all 3 product groups that were reused across multiple patients. In all collected samples, no bacterial or fungal growth was observed. Of the 3241 cataract surgeries that used reused and IUSS-sterilized instruments alongside instrument sets cultured on the same day and balanced salt solution bags shared across multiple patients, no eyes developed endophthalmitis over a 6-week follow-up period.

Conclusions: Bacterial or fungal growth was not found in extensive microbiological cultures of IUSS-sterilized ophthalmic surgical instruments and cataract surgical products that were reused in multiple patients. This microbiological data complements clinical endophthalmitis data from 2 million consecutive cases at the Aravind Eye Hospital, suggesting that their instrument and surgical supply processing practices may allow for safe and sustainable ophthalmic care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
8.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信