{"title":"Trifecta 植入物的主动脉瓣面积指数值与能量损失和瓣膜应力增加相关。","authors":"Toru Tsukada, Yasuyuki Suzuki, Bryan J Mathis, Kimi Sato, Takeshi Kawamata, Akito Imai, Tomomi Nakajima, Yuichiro Kaminishi, Hideyuki Kato, Hiroaki Sakamoto, Yuji Hiramatsu","doi":"10.1007/s10047-024-01453-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biological valves are becoming more frequently used in aortic valve replacement. While several reports have evaluated the performance of biological valves, echocardiography studies during exercise stress remain scarce. Furthermore, no current reports compare rate changes in the aortic valve area of biological valves under increased exercise load. Here, we performed exercise stress echocardiography in patients after AVR with Trifecta or Inspiris valves and compared the rates of change in aortic valve areas (AVA). In addition, hydrodynamic analysis at rest was conducted with four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging (4D-flow MRI). Exercise stress echocardiography was performed in seven Trifecta and seven Inspiris patients who underwent AVR at our hospital while 4D flow MRI was performed in all but two Trifecta cases. Comparing the percentage change in AVA when loaded to 25 W versus at rest, Trifecta was greater than Inspiris (28.7 ± 36.0 vs - 0.8 ± 12.4%). The smaller AVA at rest was considered causative for this. Meanwhile, Trifecta systolic energy loss in the prosthetic valve segment on 4D-flow MRI (97.5 ± 35.9 vs 52.7 ± 25.3 mW) was higher than Inspiris. The opening of the Trifecta valve was considered to be restricted at rest and this may reflect the current reports of early valve degradation requiring reoperation. Taken together, we observed that the Trifecta design may promote faster wear due to higher valve stress.</p>","PeriodicalId":15177,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Artificial Organs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aortic valve area index values of Trifecta implants correlate with energy loss and increased valve stress.\",\"authors\":\"Toru Tsukada, Yasuyuki Suzuki, Bryan J Mathis, Kimi Sato, Takeshi Kawamata, Akito Imai, Tomomi Nakajima, Yuichiro Kaminishi, Hideyuki Kato, Hiroaki Sakamoto, Yuji Hiramatsu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10047-024-01453-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Biological valves are becoming more frequently used in aortic valve replacement. While several reports have evaluated the performance of biological valves, echocardiography studies during exercise stress remain scarce. Furthermore, no current reports compare rate changes in the aortic valve area of biological valves under increased exercise load. Here, we performed exercise stress echocardiography in patients after AVR with Trifecta or Inspiris valves and compared the rates of change in aortic valve areas (AVA). In addition, hydrodynamic analysis at rest was conducted with four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging (4D-flow MRI). Exercise stress echocardiography was performed in seven Trifecta and seven Inspiris patients who underwent AVR at our hospital while 4D flow MRI was performed in all but two Trifecta cases. Comparing the percentage change in AVA when loaded to 25 W versus at rest, Trifecta was greater than Inspiris (28.7 ± 36.0 vs - 0.8 ± 12.4%). The smaller AVA at rest was considered causative for this. Meanwhile, Trifecta systolic energy loss in the prosthetic valve segment on 4D-flow MRI (97.5 ± 35.9 vs 52.7 ± 25.3 mW) was higher than Inspiris. The opening of the Trifecta valve was considered to be restricted at rest and this may reflect the current reports of early valve degradation requiring reoperation. Taken together, we observed that the Trifecta design may promote faster wear due to higher valve stress.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Artificial Organs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Artificial Organs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-024-01453-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Artificial Organs","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-024-01453-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
生物瓣膜越来越多地被用于主动脉瓣置换术。虽然有一些报告对生物瓣膜的性能进行了评估,但运动负荷时的超声心动图研究仍然很少。此外,目前还没有报告对生物瓣膜在运动负荷增加时主动脉瓣面积的速率变化进行比较。在此,我们对使用 Trifecta 或 Inspiris 瓣膜进行主动脉瓣置换术后的患者进行了运动负荷超声心动图检查,并比较了主动脉瓣面积(AVA)的变化率。此外,还利用四维血流磁共振成像(4D-flow MRI)对静息时的流体动力学进行了分析。在我院接受主动脉瓣置换术的七名 Trifecta 和七名 Inspiris 患者均接受了运动负荷超声心动图检查,除两名 Trifecta 患者外,其他患者均接受了四维血流磁共振成像检查。比较加载到 25 W 时与静息时 AVA 的百分比变化,Trifecta 比 Inspiris 大(28.7 ± 36.0 vs - 0.8 ± 12.4%)。静息时较小的 AVA 被认为是造成这种情况的原因。同时,在 4D 流磁共振成像中,人工瓣膜节段的 Trifecta 收缩能量损失(97.5 ± 35.9 vs 52.7 ± 25.3 mW)高于 Inspiris。Trifecta 瓣膜的开放在静息状态下受到限制,这可能反映了目前关于瓣膜早期退化需要再次手术的报道。总之,我们观察到 Trifecta 设计可能会因瓣膜应力较大而加速磨损。
Aortic valve area index values of Trifecta implants correlate with energy loss and increased valve stress.
Biological valves are becoming more frequently used in aortic valve replacement. While several reports have evaluated the performance of biological valves, echocardiography studies during exercise stress remain scarce. Furthermore, no current reports compare rate changes in the aortic valve area of biological valves under increased exercise load. Here, we performed exercise stress echocardiography in patients after AVR with Trifecta or Inspiris valves and compared the rates of change in aortic valve areas (AVA). In addition, hydrodynamic analysis at rest was conducted with four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging (4D-flow MRI). Exercise stress echocardiography was performed in seven Trifecta and seven Inspiris patients who underwent AVR at our hospital while 4D flow MRI was performed in all but two Trifecta cases. Comparing the percentage change in AVA when loaded to 25 W versus at rest, Trifecta was greater than Inspiris (28.7 ± 36.0 vs - 0.8 ± 12.4%). The smaller AVA at rest was considered causative for this. Meanwhile, Trifecta systolic energy loss in the prosthetic valve segment on 4D-flow MRI (97.5 ± 35.9 vs 52.7 ± 25.3 mW) was higher than Inspiris. The opening of the Trifecta valve was considered to be restricted at rest and this may reflect the current reports of early valve degradation requiring reoperation. Taken together, we observed that the Trifecta design may promote faster wear due to higher valve stress.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the Journal of Artificial Organs is to introduce to colleagues worldwide a broad spectrum of important new achievements in the field of artificial organs, ranging from fundamental research to clinical applications. The scope of the Journal of Artificial Organs encompasses but is not restricted to blood purification, cardiovascular intervention, biomaterials, and artificial metabolic organs. Additionally, the journal will cover technical and industrial innovations. Membership in the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs is not a prerequisite for submission.